Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 

Brook Valley Community Group v Brook Waimarama Sanctuary

COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND

TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA

11 December 2018

MEDIA RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE PUBLICATION

BROOK VALLEY COMMUNITY GROUP INC v BROOK WAIMARAMA SANCTUARY TRUST [2018] NZCA 573

PRESS SUMMARY

This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment and reasons can be found at www.courtsofnz.govt.nz.

1. The Court of Appeal today released a judgment dismissing the appeal of the Brook Valley Community Group Inc (the Community Group), which challenged the lawfulness of the aerial discharge of the toxin brodifacoum in the Brook Valley in Nelson.

Background

2. The Brook Waimarama Sanctuary Trust (the Trust) is a charitable trust which operates a fenced wildlife sanctuary in the Brook Valley. In 2017, it intended to carry out three aerial applications of baits containing brodifacoum in the sanctuary in order to achieve pest eradication. The Trust relied on the Resource Management (Exemption) Regulations 2017 (the Regulations), which exempts the discharge of brodifacoum from s 15 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the RMA) under certain conditions. Section 15 generally proscribes the discharge of contaminants. The Regulations were made under s 360(1)(h) of the RMA.

3. The Community Group in the High Court challenged the validity of the Regulations, and also argued that an additional resource consent was required under s 13 of the RMA as it was a deposit of a substance. The Community Group sought declarations that the Regulations were unlawful and that the aerial discharge of brodifacoum was prohibited under s 13(1)(d) of the RMA. The High Court held that s 13 was not applicable, and that the decision to promulgate the Regulations was properly authorised and made in accordance with all required considerations.

4. Following the delivery of the High Court judgment, the Community Group applied unsuccessfully to the High Court and to the Court of Appeal for a stay and interim relief. Following the Court of Appeal’s refusal of interim relief the Trust conducted the three drops of brodifacoum in September and October 2017.

The Judgment

5. The Community Group argued that the regulation making power in s 360(1)(h) of the RMA should be read down to achieve the purpose of the Act, and that the Regulations were repugnant to the Act and made for an improper purpose. The Community Group further argued that even if the Regulations were valid, resource consent is required under s 13 of the RMA.

6. The Court has decided that the Regulations fall within the power conferred by s 360(1)(h) of the RMA, and they are consistent with the Act’s purpose of sustainable management and with the provisions in ss 6–7, as the purpose of the exemption from s 15 was to provide an effective means of protecting New Zealand’s native species, forests and fauna.

7. The Court has also decided that s 13(1)(d) of the RMA would require consent for deposits only where those deposits do not occur as part of a discharge for which consent may be granted under s 15. In this case the only relevant deposit is as a consequent of discharges, and the exemption from obtaining resource consent under s 15 means that no consent under s 13 is required.

Scoop copy of judgment: 2018NZCA573BrookValleyvBrookWaimarama.pdf


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On Labour Refusing To Lead A Progressive Drugs Policy

Once again, Labour has chosen not to use (a) its parliamentary majority and (b) the huge mandate it was given at the last election in order to (c) bring about progressive social change. Once again, Labour seems to regard its main purpose for being in power as being to keep National and Act out of power. Will Labour for instance, overhaul our out-dated, unsafe, and unjust laws on drugs? No, it will not... More>>

 

Government: The Duke Of Edinburgh

9 April 2021 Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern today expressed New Zealand’s sorrow at the death of His Royal Highness The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. “Our thoughts are with Her Majesty The Queen at this profoundly sad time. On behalf of the New ... More>>

ALSO:

Government: Delivers Next Phase Of Climate Action

The Government is delivering on a key election commitment to tackle climate change, by banning new low and medium temperature coal-fired boilers and partnering with the private sector to help it transition away from fossil fuels. This is the first ... More>>

Government: Independent Experts To Advise On Post-Vaccination Future

The Government is acting to ensure decisions on responding to the next phase of the COVID-19 pandemic are informed by the best available scientific evidence and strategic public health advice. “New Zealand has worked towards an elimination ... More>>

Health: Drug-Testing Law To Be Made Permanent

Interim legislation that is already proving to keep people safer from drugs will be made permanent, Health Minister Andrew Little says. More>>

World Travel: New Zealand Temporarily Suspending Travel From India - PM Jacinda Ardern

Travel into New Zealand from India - including for New Zealand citizens and residents - is being temporarily suspended because of high numbers of Covid-19 cases. More>>

Finance: Crown Accounts Again Better Than Forecast

Hon Grant Robertson Minister of Finance The economic recovery from COVID-19 continues to be reflected in the Government’s books, which are again better than expected. The Crown accounts for the eight months to the end of February 2021 showed both OBEGAL ... More>>

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels