Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search


CNI Wood Council's Response To Federated Farmers' Call For The Govt To Place Stricter Controls On Forest Planting

This response is made on behalf of members of the Central North Island Wood Council (CNIWC) and is in response to Federated Farmers call for the government to place stricter controls on forest planting.

The CNI Wood Council is somewhat perplexed at NZ Federated Farmers recent press release calling for stricter controls on afforestation on Class 1 to 5 land, and even Class 6 and higher. Here in the Central North Island, it was only a matter of a years ago that farming interests, including Federated Farmers, lobbied heavily for controls to prevent further conversion of forest land to farms. The reason for their concern was the significant impacts on water quality that this would cause. In the pumice country where the conversions were occurring, conversion from forests to dairy farming will result in at least a twenty-fold increase in nitrate leaching rates. Farming interests understood that increasing the area of farmland in already polluted catchments would worsen water quality problems, inevitably resulting in even tighter rules for all their existing farmers. The Waikato Regional Council and Bay of Plenty Regional Council brought in ‘grand parenting’ rules for the Waikato River and Lake Rotorua catchments, which effectively locks in existing forestry, removing the landowner’s property rights to be able to convert to any other land use. Federated Farmers supported the rules in both instances. This has since been replicated at a national level in the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater. Much of the forest to dairy conversion that occurred in Central North Island was on Class 3, 4 and 6 lands. To have Federated Farmers now calling for rules to prevent conversion of farmland to forestry seems to directly contradict their previous position.

At a national level, the National Environmental Standard for Plantation forestry already has rules (supported by the industry) controlling afforestation on the most erodible land (Class 7 & 8) recognising the concerns with harvesting on this highly erodible land, land that were planted historically, was often done by the Crown in order to try and reduce the severe levels of erosion besetting much of NZ’s hill country following clearance for farming or because planning rules at the time saw tree planting as something that should only occur where farming was not possible. We live with the legacy of these historical decisions now. Piecing together the various conflicting components promulgated by Federated Farmers one could be mistaken for the policy stance being simply a continuation of long held anti-tree views. In years past where the primacy of pastoral farming was unquestionable, those views are understandable, but the world has and is changing fast. In many landscapes pastoral farming has struggled to make anything like a reasonable return on capital, and aging farmers have struggled to find a workable succession plan or exit strategy. Climatic variability and the pressing need to confront water quality and climate change issues are all applying new stressors that are coming to bear, and societal trends toward urbanisation are at play in NZ just as they are in the rest of the world.

It is the combination of all these factors, along with massive reductions in stock numbers over the years, increasing processing efficiencies and centralisation that is driving change in the rural sector and their communities. As far as the concern with afforestation rates, the recent upswing in planting rates and afforestation that is occurring now has not even yet reversed the recent levels of deforestation that occurred over the last decade as intensive pastoral agriculture replaced forests. Forestry interests therefore fully appreciate the concerns from famers seeing ‘good farmland’ being planted into forests. Foresters have felt the same way in recent years seeing good forestry land being converted into farms, with all the well-recognised adverse downstream effects that go with that. But we do not believe that introducing arbitrary rule to lock and use land in its current land use patterns regardless of the economic and environmental effects, is the best path forward for NZ. The reality is that forestry is a productive land use, and studies have affirmed that it generates good income and provides jobs and provides for a range of environmental benefits. It is also the best productive land use for some land types, and we unquestionably need more trees integrated into farming landscapes. Farmers themselves are almost certainly going to need to embrace that fact if the Climate Change Commission’s draft recommendations are to come close to being implemented. If NZ fails in that goal, and pastoral agriculture remains a huge component of NZ’s emissions profile – what then? Will farmers be paying hard cash to offset their contribution? If not, who is?

Ultimately NZ needs much more integrated landscapes. To introduce rules that would place constraints on existing farmers, dictating where they can and cannot plant trees, seems to us to be a backward step. To also introduce rules on the easier country (class 1-5 and even 6) leaves us in a situation of effectively deterring afforestation on any land. That will surely not help NZ achieve our climate change or water quality goals.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Geo-political Posturing Over China’s Cyber Hacks, Plus The Weekly Playlist

The timing was one of the weirder aspects of this week’s cyber condemnation of China by the West. Why was this piece of political theatre being staged now? China (and Russia’s) sponsoring and/or condoning of semi-state and criminal hacker groups has been known about for nigh on a decade. More particularly, Microsoft had been alerted to the flaws in its Microsoft Exchange... More>>


Government: Quarantine Free Travel With Australia Suspended

Quarantine Free Travel from all Australian states and territories to New Zealand is being suspended as the Covid situation there worsens, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins announced today... More>>


Government: New Zealand Condemns Malicious Cyber Activity By Chinese State-sponsored Actors

New Zealand has established links between Chinese state-sponsored actors known as Advanced Persistent Threat 40 (APT40) and malicious cyber activity in New Zealand. “The GCSB has worked through a robust technical attribution process in relation to this activity. New Zealand is today joining other countries in strongly condemning this malicious activity... More>>


Government: Commits $600,000 To Flood Recovery

The Government is contributing $600,000 to help residents affected by the weekend’s violent weather with recovery efforts. Acting Minister for Emergency Management Kris Faafoi and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor have been in the Buller district this afternoon to assess flood damage and support the local response effort... More>>


NZUS Council: Welcomes Nomination Of Senator Tom Udall As US Ambassador To NZ

The NZUS Council welcomes the nomination of Senator Tom Udall to the role of US Ambassador to New Zealand and Samoa, NZUS Council executive director Jordan Small said... More>>

BusinessNZ: Visa Extensions Welcomed
BusinessNZ has welcomed the extension of some critical skill visa durations and changes to immigration systems to speed processing. Chief Executive Kirk Hope says move acknowledges advocacy by the hospitality sector, the BusinessNZ Network and others, and comes not a moment too soon.... More>>

Social Development: Government Initiatives Contribute To Fall In Benefit Numbers

Minister for Social Development Carmel Sepuloni has welcomed the release of the June quarter Benefit Statistics which show a continuing fall in the number of people receiving a Main Benefit... More>>




InfoPages News Channels