Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Takeovers Panel clears Lowe Corporation


Takeovers Panel clears Lowe Corporation’s offer for Blue Sky Meats

The Takeovers Panel met on 4 November 2002 to consider whether Lowe Corporation Limited (Lowe) had acted, was acting, or was intending to act in compliance with the Takeovers Code.

On October 9 Lowe made a full offer for all the shares in Blue Sky Meats (N.Z.) Limited (BSM) at $4.50 per share. Horizon Meats New Zealand Limited (Horizon) holds 37% (2,709,594) of BSM’s shares and has a marketing contract with BSM.

If the takeover becomes unconditional Horizon is to be paid $2.7 million for terminating the marketing contract and the transfer of trademarks. This is in addition to Horizon receiving the same consideration per share that is to be paid to other shareholders.

BSM’s target company statement of 23 October said, “… One shareholder (Horizon) may receive additional consideration for its shares which is different to the other shareholders …” and “ … The effect of any over-compensation for terminating this contract could result in additional consideration being received by Horizon.”

Subsequently on 29 October the Panel issued an order restraining Lowe from proceeding with its offer because it considered the offer may not comply with rule 20 of the Code in that Horizon may receive more consideration for each of its shares than other shareholders.

The meeting on 4 November 2002 was called to hear evidence and submissions from the parties and to determine whether Lowe would comply with rule 20 if Horizon was paid $2.7 million compensation for terminating the marketing contract in the event of the offer for Blue Sky becoming unconditional. The Panel determined that the consideration offered for terminating the marketing contract did not contain additional consideration to Horizon for the purchase of its shares. The Panel is satisfied that the same consideration is being provided for all securities under the takeover and, accordingly, is satisfied that Lowe has complied with rule 20.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

The Panel has, in its determination, expressed concern that the independent adviser, Polson Higgs & Co, Chartered Accountants, did not make an assessment of the proposed payment of $2.7m to Horizon. In the Panel’s view it was part of the adviser’s role to do so. The Panel is also of the view that the directors of BSM had a responsibility to see that the issue of the proposed payment was properly addressed.

The interim restraining orders expire at 5pm today.


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
GenPro: General Practices Begin Issuing Clause 14 Notices

GenPro has been copied into a rising number of Clause 14 notices issued since the NZNO lodged its Primary Practice Pay Equity Claim against General Practice employers in December 2023.More

SPADA: Screen Industry Unites For Streaming Platform Regulation & Intellectual Property Protections

In an unprecedented international collaboration, representatives of screen producing organisations from around the world have released a joint statement.More

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.