Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Decision a victory for supermarket consumers

Decision a victory for supermarket consumers

The Commerce Commission says a decision by the Court of Appeal overturning the High Court decision on ownership of The Warehouse Group Ltd is a victory for supermarket consumers and competition in markets.

In the second appeal from the Commission's clearance decision, the Court of Appeal has today reversed the High Court's November 2007 decision that cleared the way for the three Foodstuffs co-operatives and Woolworths Ltd to acquire up to 100% shares in, or assets of, The Warehouse.

The Commission's case has focussed on its concerns about competition in the supermarket sector where there is, in effect, a duopoly at present, except in the three regions where The Warehouse has opened a supercentre.

Commerce Commission Chair Paula Rebstock says, "New Zealand consumers know that more competition is needed in the supermarket sector. In coming to its decision to decline the acquisition the Commission considered that The Warehouse had already brought important new dimensions to supermarket competition, and potential competition, through its innovative supercentre stores."

"The Commission was prepared to leave it to the market to decide whether The Warehouse supercentres would be viable. We did not consider that the Commission could rule out The Warehouse as a significant supermarket competitor, either now or into the future. The Commission considered that the presence of an innovative third party such as The Warehouse - had the potential to increase the level of competition in this important market," says Ms Rebstock.
"New Zealand consumers and competition are the winners today," says Ms Rebstock.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

The Commission declined clearance in mid-2007 for acquisition by either Foodstuffs or Woolworths, because New Zealand's supermarket retail market is already highly concentrated. There are high barriers to entry in the industry, yet The Warehouse is uniquely placed to compete with the supermarkets because of its existing property portfolio, extensive distribution networks and established brand.

The Commission is studying the judgment. No further comment will be made until the full reasons for the judgment are released publicly by the Court of Appeal.

Background
On 21 December 2006 the Commission received an application from the three Foodstuffs co-operatives seeking clearance to acquire up to 100% of the ordinary shares in The Warehouse Group Limited. On 17 January 2007 the Commission received an application from Woolworths Limited seeking clearance to acquire up to 100% of the shares in, or assets, of The Warehouse Group Limited. On 8 June the Commission declined to grant clearance for either acquisition, on the basis that it was not satisfied that either of the proposed acquisitions would not have, or would not be likely to have, the effect of substantially lessening competition in relevant markets.

On 29 November 2007 the High Court, on appeal by Foodstuffs and Woolworths, overturned the Commission's decision to decline clearance for either potential acquisition.

The Court of Appeal heard the Commission's appeal on 28 April - 1 May 2008.


ends


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.