Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Clear velvet marketing choices for farmers

VELEXCO CO-OPERATIVE GROUP      
Media release
11 December 2008
 
 
Clear velvet marketing choices for farmers

For more information, please contact James Guild, tel 03 318 6873 or Ross Chambers, 027 280 5586
 
The NZ Velvet Marketing Company (NZVM) will be a positive initiative if it puts some discipline into the way velvet is sold, says James Guild, chairman of rival marketer Velexco.
 
He says it also finally gives farmers a clear choice about who they want to control and develop their industry – commercial brokers or velvet producers themselves. 
 
PGG Wrightson (PGW) and Tasman Velvet Processors announced last week that they were merging their velvet marketing businesses under the NZVM banner. Farmer suppliers are being given the opportunity to have directors and a minority shareholding in NZVM’s marketing arm.
 
“PGW’s flirtation with the idea of selling their velvet business to farmers is clearly over. When Velexco made an offer during the winter to buy PGW Velvet for a price based on PGW’s own valuation formula, and which included PGW retaining both a shareholding and the procurement contract, it was declined on the grounds that it would be temporarily debt-funded and because of bad timing,” Mr Guild says.
 
“The fact that Velexco was not involved in the discussions leading up to the launch of NZVM shows that PGW and Tasman got cold feet about what producer ownership would mean for their revenue streams.
 
“Under the NZVM model, those velvet growers who take up shares may eventually end up with one-third of the marketing business, while the two parent companies maintain control. Ownership of the profitable collection, grading, brokerage and packhouse operations remains with PGW and Tasman.”
 
He says the purchase of the PGW velvet brokerage by Velexco would have been the quickest and cleanest way to achieve velvet market reform. Nevertheless, Velexco will continue to share market intelligence with NZVM where this is in the interests of velvet producers.
 
“But producers should not confuse NZVM with market reform. If PGW was serious about reforming selling systems it would have stopped tendering velvet at its weekly pools. It is hard to think of a better way to drive down prices than running auctions in a weak market.
 
“Brokers like PGW and toll processors and exporters like Tasman use the language of reform, but they are driven by margins and throughput. While they talk about maximising long-term velvet returns, their focus is short-term -- on generating cash for their owners.
 
“In contrast, Velexco decisions are made in the interests of its grower shareholders, each of whom – because of their substantial on-farm investment in velvet production – has a vested interest in the development of markets that offer stable and sustainable prices in the long-term.”
 
He says this difference in focus and philosophy lay behind the collapse earlier this year of three-way joint venture talks between PGW, Tasman and Velexco. In retrospect, he says, the differences were so great that a joint venture would have never worked. When these talks collapsed, and in response to PGW’s acknowledgement that the velvet supply chain should eventually be owned by producers, Velexco made its offer to buy PGW’s velvet business.
 
Mr Guild says Velexco is enjoying a surge in farmer support, with its market share increasing by 25 per cent last year and further increases in shareholders and volume for this season, despite a decline in New Zealand velvet production.
 
“More and more deer farmers now realise that commission-based selling systems have not served them well – that to achieve stability and a long-term future for velvet the only answer is the consolidation of marketing in a farmer-owned business that has strong relationships in the marketplace.”
 
[ends]

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 



Electricity Authority: Review Of Competition In The Wholesale Electricity Market Raises Questions

In March 2021 the Electricity Authority announced it would conduct a review into competition in the wholesale electricity market. The period of the review covers the sustained elevated electricity prices since an unplanned outage at the Pohokura gas facility in Spring 2018... More>>


Government: RSI ‘State Of The Nation’ Report Published
latest research, science and innovation system report card is now available, and outlines how the system is performing, Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods has announced. “The report seeks to increase transparency, act as a reliable data source and stimulate discussion... More>>




Fonterra: Increases 2021/22 Forecast Farmgate Milk Price

Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited today increased and narrowed its forecast Farmgate Milk Price range to NZD $7.90 - $8.90 per kgMS, from NZD $7.25 - $8.75 per kgMS. The midpoint of the range, which farmers are paid off, has increased to NZD $8.40 per kgMS, from NZD $8.00 per kgMS... More>>




Pamu & Westpac: Market-leading Sustainability-Linked Loan

Westpac NZ and Pāmu have signed New Zealand’s most comprehensive Sustainability-Linked Loan to date, also the largest in the agricultural sector, and the first involving a state-owned enterprise. Pāmu, also known as Landcorp, is New Zealand’s biggest farming business. It will borrow $85m from Westpac NZ over three years... More>>


Retail NZ: Some Good News In COVID Announcements, But Firm Dates Needed

Retail NZ is welcoming news that the Government is increasing financial support for businesses in light of the ongoing COVID-19 lockdown, and that retail will be able to open at all stages of the new “Covid Protection Framework... More>>

ComCom: Companies In Hot Water For Selling Unsafe Hot Water Bottles And Toys

A wholesaler and a retailer have been fined a total of $140,000 under the Fair Trading Act for selling hot water bottles and toys that did not comply with mandatory safety requirements. Paramount Merchandise Company Limited (Paramount) was fined $104,000 after pleading guilty in the Manukau District Court... More>>