Apple Pips Samsung But Ferrari World’s Most Powerful Brand
NEWS RELEASE – For immediate release
Apple Pips Samsung But Ferrari World’s Most Powerful Brand
LONDON, UK: Apple (US$87 billion) pips Samsung (US$58 billion) as the world’s most valuable brand but Ferrari is the world’s most powerful brand, according to leading brand valuation and marketing experts Brand Finance.
Table 1: Top 5 most valuable brands in the world | ||||||
Brand Value Rank 2013 | Brand | Domicile | Brand Value 2013 (US$ bn) | Brand Value 2012 (US$ bn) | Change (US$ bn) | Change (%) |
1 | Apple | US | 87.3 | 70.6 | 16.7 | 24% |
2 | Samsung | South Korea | 58.8 | 38.2 | 20.6 | 54% |
3 | US | 52.1 | 47.5 | 4.7 | 10% | |
4 | Microsoft | US | 45.5 | 45.8 | -0.3 | -1% |
5 | Walmart | US | 42.3 | 38.3 | 4 | 10% |
Source: BrandFinance® Global 500 (2013) |
The Global 500 analyses financial and brand performance of leading brands across all major business-to-consumer (B2C) and business-to-business (B2B) sectors, making it the most extensive brand valuation study of its kind in the world.
Apple pips Samsung
Electronics giant Apple had a roller coaster year in 2012 – its enterprise value rocketed from US$350 billion to US$600 billion only to dip to US$400 billion in the space of 12 months. Despite a raft of new product launches such as the new iPhone and iPad the company continued to lose ground to Samsung and it was only its sheer size that helped Apple maintain its lead position over its smaller but more nimble South Korean rival.
The net result for Apple’s brand value was a rise from $70 billion to $87 billion but a slight weakening of its brand rating from AAA+ to AAA.
The mighty Apple brand is supporting the company as it arguably loses its competitive edge to Samsung in the wake of the launch of Galaxy S3, the most pre-ordered smart phone of all time. Samsung’s brand value leaped by a staggering 54 per cent (US$20.6 billion) and more new digital consumer products are expected to be launched during 2013.
Commenting on the findings, Brand Finance CEO David Haigh said: “Brand is one of many intangible assets which drive profitable growth. Technology, contractual, human capital and customer intangibles as well as general goodwill all drive overall corporate value. With revenues in the tens of billions, Apple and Samsung are slugging it out for global brand supremacy and are vying with each other to create strong ‘customer love’ for their brands. However, there are other brands in the Global 500 that though they may never challenge the brand value giants, are nonetheless extremely powerful and well-loved.”
Italian Beauty
A case in point is Ferrari, owned by Italian car giant Fiat, that achieved the highest brand rating in the Global 500 despite being a niche sports car manufacturer with a much smaller enterprise value than many of the other global brands in the Top 500.
“I often think that the Italian genius for car design is based in the language of craft,” comments world renowned design critic Stephen Bayley. “Theirs is a workshop vocabulary with words for a car’s features and contours many of which simply don’t exist in English. If you have a word for it you can draw it. That word is beauty,” he says.
Table 2: Top 5 strongest brands in the world according to brand rating | ||||
Brand Rating Rank 2013 | Brand | Domicile | Brand Value 2013 (US$ bn) | Brand Value 2012 (US$ bn) |
1 | Ferrari | Italy | 3.6 | 3.3* |
2 | US | 52.1 | 47.5 | |
3 | Coca-Cola | US | 34.2 | 31.1 |
4 | PwC | US | 16.4 | 14.3 |
5 | Hermes | France | 4.5 | 3.4 |
Source: BrandFinance® Global 500 (2013) | ||||
*Ferrari brand value restated for 2012, according to 2013 methodology |
A key driver of brand value is revenue. Clearly Ferrari cannot compete in terms of the size of the multi-national brands. However its brand rating takes into account other financial metrics such as net margins, average revenue per customer, marketing and advertising spend as well as qualitative measures such as brand affection and loyalty.
Taken together, Ferrari outperforms not only rival auto manufacturers BMW, VW, Mercedes Benz, Lexus and Audi but all brands worldwide.
Ferrari today announced record results for the first nine months of 2012, recording an increase in net profits by 7.6 per cent to €152.4m on a turnover of €1.76 billion.
"It is always a pleasure to top any list and still more so when the competition includes some of the world's most famous companies. This achievement proves that even in very tough economic times, Italy can still offer the world businesses of excellence," commented Ferrari Chairman Luca di Montezemolo. "Behind this acknowledgement are exceptional products made by equally exceptional men and women. They made it possible and for that I thank them."
David Haigh concludes:
“As the Global 500 powerfully demonstrates, customer expectations of brands are much higher than ever as trust becomes a critical business issue in a time of increased economic uncertainty. To fulfil such expectations, brand owners must continue to innovate whilst at the same time deliver quality with value, choice with social responsibility and sustainability with growth.”
Australian Brands
Eight Australian brands have featured in the Global 500, with Woolworths inching closer to joining the Top 100 Global 500 Brands. For more information on the Australian contingent, contact us.
--
Notes
The methodology used in compiling the Global 500 uses a discounted cash flow (DCF) technique to discount estimated future royalties at an appropriate discount rate and to arrive at a new present value (NPV) of the trademark and associated intellectual property rights in order to compute brand value.
Royalty Relief Approach
The royalty
relief methodology determines the value of the brand in
relation to the royalty rate that would be payable for its
use if it were owned by a third party. The royalty rate is
applied to future revenue to determine an earnings stream
that is attributable to the brand. The brand earnings stream
is then discounted back to a net present
value.
There is a six-step process involved in
making the brand value calculations:
1. Obtain
specific financial and revenue data.
2. Model the market
to identify market demand and the position of individual
brands in the context of all other market competitors. There
are three forecast periods used:
o historical financial
results up to 2012. Where these are not available using
Institutional Brokers Estimate System (IBES), consensus
forecasts are used;
o a five-year forecast period
(2012-2016), based on three data sources (IBES, historic
growth and GDP growth); and
o perpetuity growth, based on
a combination of growth expectations (GDP and
IBES).
3. Calculate the royalty rate for each brand by:
o calculating brand strength – on a scale of 0-100,
according to the number of attributes such as financial,
brand equity, market share and profitability, among
others;
o using brand strength to determine randeta®
index score; and
o applying Brand Strength Score to the
royalty rate range to determine the royalty rate for the
brand. The royalty rate is determined by a combination of
the sector of operations, historic royalties paid in that
sector and profitability of the company.
4. Calculate the
future post-tax royalty income stream.
5. Calculate the
discount rate specific to each brand, taking account of its
size, geographical presence, reputation, gearing and brand
rating.
6. Discount future royalty stream (explicit
forecast and perpetuity periods) to a net present value –
ie. the brand value
Brand
Ratings
These are calculated using Brand
Strength analysis, which benchmarks the strength, risk and
future potential of a brand relative to its competitors on a
scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a
credit rating. The data used to calculate the ratings is
taken from a variety of sources including Bloomberg, annual
reports and proprietary research by Brand Finance.
Note: The AAA to A ratings can be altered by including a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show their more detailed positioning.
Valuation Date
All brand
values in the Global 500 are for the end of the year, 31
December 2012.
ENDS