Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Cavalier Bremworth welcomes clarity from Court of Appeal

Cavalier Bremworth welcomes clarity from Court of Appeal decision

New Zealand carpet maker Cavalier Bremworth has welcomed today’s decision by the Court of Appeal over its promotion of warranties, saying that it has implications not only for Cavalier Bremworth but for every manufacturer that issues and promotes warranties on its products.

The High Court had found the STAINMASTER® warranty booklet offered on Cavalier Bremworth’s new range of synthetic carpets was not misleading and still remains valid. The Court of Appeal did not need to consider this, but it did find that some of the statements made on Cavalier Bremworth’s website and the STAINMASTER® sample label were misleading.

Cavalier Bremworth had already made changes proactively to its website and sent a letter to retailers in advance of the High Court hearing, which was 15 months ago. The Court of Appeal noted the ‘prompt and responsible actions’ taken by Cavalier Bremworth to make the changes proactively. The Court of Appeal also decided not to issue a declaration or grant declaratory relief or to award costs to Godfrey Hirst.

CEO of Cavalier Bremworth, Brent Wollaston said the ‘advertising’ complained of by Godfrey Hirst related to brief historical summaries of the warranties for the four synthetic carpets provided by STAINMASTER® that appeared on the company’s website for a short period of time and on a warranty sample sticker provided by STAINMASTER® for carpet samples. The website had less than 100 views, and the letter was sent to 75 retailers.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

“It is tempting for the media and legal counsel for Godfrey Hirst to overuse the word ‘advertising’ and consumers to assume that this means mass media advertising campaigns using the likes of tv, press or radio – this was not actually the case with our promotion. It was extremely limited in scope.”

Mr Wollaston said the Court's decision would help everyone in the industry understand how to promote their warranties.

“Cavalier Bremworth takes its responsibilities to consumers very seriously. This was evidenced by the proactive changes we made to our website and a follow-up letter to retailers, as soon as this matter came to our attention, and before the High Court hearing last year.”

Ends

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
GenPro: General Practices Begin Issuing Clause 14 Notices

GenPro has been copied into a rising number of Clause 14 notices issued since the NZNO lodged its Primary Practice Pay Equity Claim against General Practice employers in December 2023.More

SPADA: Screen Industry Unites For Streaming Platform Regulation & Intellectual Property Protections

In an unprecedented international collaboration, representatives of screen producing organisations from around the world have released a joint statement.More

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.