Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Breaking Settlement Agreements

19 May 2019

Nine out of ten times, a Settlement Agreement will have a non-disparagement clause. The clause will read something like;

"The Employee shall not make any disparaging comments about or otherwise disparage the Employer or any of its officers or employees. The employees of the Employer who are aware of this record of settlement shall not make disparaging comments about the Employee. The parties agree that the confidentiality of this agreement and non –disparagement extend to all forms of social media including Facebook and text messages."

What is a disparaging comment? Broadly defined as expressing the opinion that something, for relevance to this article rather someone, is of little worth - derogatory to the person. Disparaging comments can be verbal or written.

Therefore, if you have signed a settlement agreement with a non-disparagement clause, you are not allowed to say anything derogatory about any party involved in the matter. This applies not only to the employer, but also to the employee. Should either party disparage the other , it is seen as a breach in terms of section 149(4) of the Employment Relations Act 2000, which states that any person who is in breach of an agreed term of settlement, is liable to pay a penalty imposed by the Authority.

This is exactly what happened in the matter of Stephen Duggan v Armaan Dev Enterprises Ltd [2019] NZERA 238.

Mr Duggan and Armaan Dev Enterprises Ltd (the employer), entered into a settlement agreement after having an employment problem. The settlement agreement, containing a disparaging clause, was signed by both parties and confirmed by a mediator of the MBIE.

Beginning November 2018, a comment was posted about Mr Duggan, by Amit Gulati, a director of the company, on Mr Gulati's Facebook page. On 8 November 2018 a friend alerted Mr Duggan to the post. Duggan went into his girlfriend's Facebook and took a screenshot of the comment. Duggan's representative called Amit Gulati, who immediately took down the comment. At that stage, the comment had been on his Facebook page for more or less 3 weeks already.

The content of the comment wasn't made public in the decision of the ERA, but the presiding Member of Authority, Helen Doyle, was satisfied that the comment was disparaging, not towards Mr Duggan's competence, but rather directed towards his personality.

Mr Gulati maintained throughout the proceedings that he didn't post the comment, but rather that a friend posted the comment on his page. Mr Gulati didn't call the friend to corroborate his version of the events during the proceedings and the Authority had to accept that the post was made by Gulati himself.

The company was instructed to pay a penalty of $3,000.00 as they were in breach of the signed settlement agreement. $2,250.00 of that for Mr Duggan and $750.00 for the Crown. Further, they have to pay $1,350.00 towards Mr Duggan's costs and $71.56 as reimbursement of the filing fee. Making the total payable $4,421.56.

Also worth noting that while settlements are private and confidential, Employment Relation Authority cases and decisions are not. Neither party often benefit from an ERA decision being in the public domain.


© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Foodstuffs: New World & Four Square Trial NZ’s First Grocery Delivery Offer With Uber Eats

New World & Four Square have partnered with Uber Eats to unlock the first grocery offering available on the platform in Aotearoa. For New World and Four Square it’s yet another way to put New Zealanders first, particularly with those inevitable last-minute grocery needs... More>>

Digitl: Download 2.0 – Vodafone Wi-Fi Calling hits early milestone
Vodafone says it has 10,000 customers using its Wi-Fi Calling service. It took less than three months to reach that milestone; the service began operating in September... More>>

Energy Resources Aotearoa: New Law On Decommissioning Could Be Costly Overkill
A new law on decommissioning oil and gas fields passed by Parliament today has good intentions but is overkill, according to Energy Resources Aotearoa. "We strongly support operators taking responsibility and paying the costs for decommissioning, which is what all good operators do," says chief executive John Carnegie... More>>

ABC Business Sales: Demand High For Covid-proof Businesses
Despite the continuing challenges facing businesses in this Covid environment, right now there are more buyers looking for a small-medium sized business than there are sellers in the market... More>>

PriceSpy: Producer Prices Increase
New Black Friday and Covid-19 Report* released by PriceSpy says people’s fear of stepping inside physical shops during big sales events like Black Friday has risen since last year; Kiwis are still planning to shop, but more than ever will do it online this year... More>>

NZ Skeptics Society: Announce Their 2021 Awards, And Dr Simon Thornley Wins The Bent Spoon

Every year the New Zealand Skeptics presents its awards to people and organisations who have impressed us or dismayed us, and this year it’s been hard to pick our winners because there have been so many choices!.. More>>

REINZ: Sales Volumes Leveling Out

Data released today by the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand (REINZ) shows there were 44 fewer lifestyle property sales (-2.6%) for the three months ended October 2021 than for the three months ended September 2021... More>>