Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Royal Jelly Supplements Mislead Consumers As Being From New Zealand

New Zealand Health Food Company Ltd (NZHFC) has been fined $377,000 after pleading guilty to engaging in conduct that was liable to mislead the public about the origin of ingredients in its royal jelly supplements.

The combination of phrases and images used by NZHFC to market its royal jelly products gave the impression that the products were from New Zealand when the key ingredient came from China.

The Commerce Commission’s investigation showed that from December 2015 to December 2020, NZHFC made various representations on product labelling, the company’s websites, social media, and through other marketing channels such as email newsletters, including: 
• “100% New Zealand” 
• “Our product range is a selection of some of the finest bee products that New Zealand’s wild and rugged landscapes have to offer”
• “The New Zealand Health Food Company is dedicated to bringing you premium quality products which have been sourced from the pristine environment that is synonymous with New Zealand”.

The images used on the packaging included the silhouette of the Kiwi and map of New Zealand, as well as mountain and pasture imagery.

The Commission filed three representative charges against the Christchurch-based company which sold the products under three different brands: New Zealand Health Food, Manuka South, and Kiwi Natural Health. NZHFC trades throughout New Zealand and also exports to overseas markets. The royal jelly in the supplements came from China, royal jelly processing took place overseas, and most of the other ingredients were sourced from overseas. The royal jelly was put into capsules and packaged in New Zealand.

Christchurch District Court His Honour Judge Ruth said in sentencing NZHFC “What the company knew at the start was that its royal jelly was from China. The customers must have been entitled to know the origin of the products they were buying and to not say where it came from was at best careless and at worst done deliberately due to the advantage that arose to the potential purchasers’ state of mind and advantage to be gained over the distributors who did abide by the rules.”

“There was potential harm to the New Zealand brand in a general sense. NZ products do enjoy something of a clean, green imagery benefit and our overseas markets would look with favour, I think, with a product said to be produced here,” said Judge Ruth.

Commission Chair Anna Rawlings said “Businesses need to consider the overall impression that consumers are likely to form from the phrases and images used in marketing, including brand names. Country of origin claims are very difficult for consumers to verify, so businesses must ensure packaging and marketing materials are clear and not misleading.”

“It is very disappointing to continue seeing traders using association with New Zealand in a misleading way for commercial gain. When consumers are not provided with accurate information, they may be deprived of the choice to buy an alternative product had they known the truth about the origin of the products’ ingredients. Conduct that misleads consumers also disadvantages other traders who produce goods that are genuinely made in New Zealand with ingredients sourced from New Zealand,” said Ms Rawlings.

Judge Ruth shared this view and said “My principle concern was the lack of action or any responsibility taken in the aftermath of the Topline prosecution. It must have been glaringly obviously to anyone with any business acumen that it needed to look at its labelling, its marketing and ask what might need to be fixed and go about doing so.”


History of NZHFC
New Zealand Health Food Company Limited had previously been involved in the Commission’s investigation and prosecution of Topline International for similar misleading country of origin claims. NZHFC had also received a guidance letter that the Commission sent to a number of traders outlining concerns about place of origin labelling on dietary supplements. These interactions, and particularly its cooperation with the earlier investigation, ought to have alerted the company to its own conduct being unlawful.

Relevant cases and information
Fact Sheet: Place of origin representations
Topline International fined $405,000 for claims about bee pollen
Farmland Foods fined $180,000 for misleading customers about country of origin
GO Healthy New Zealand fined $337,500 for misleading consumers about supplements
Court finds that New Zealand Nutritionals made misleading statements about country of origin
Nangong fined $109,000 for false claims
Consumers misled by imported royal jelly passed off as NZ-made
Fines for another company peddling royal jelly using false claims
Another company fined for misleading representation of royal jelly
More false royal jelly claims see trader fined $12,750More false country of origin claims on Royal Jelly product result in fines

© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Consumer NZ: Buy-now, Pay-later Raking In $10m+ In Late Fees Annually

A Consumer NZ survey has found buy-now, pay-later services are costing shoppers more than $10 million a year in late fees. Close to four out of 10 Kiwi consumers use buy-now, pay-later services, such as Afterpay, Laybuy and Zip... More>>

Westpac: Catherine Mcgrath Appointed New Zealand CEO

Westpac Group CEO Peter King and the Westpac New Zealand Board today announced the appointment of Catherine McGrath as Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand... More>>

Amazon: AWS To Open Data Centres In New Zealand

Today, Amazon Web Services (AWS), announced plans to open an infrastructure region in Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. The new AWS Asia Pacific (Auckland) Region will consist of three Availability Zones (AZs) and join the existing 81 Availability Zones across 25 geographic AWS Regions at launch... More>>


Statistics: Surge In Imports Results In Record Monthly Trade Deficit
Imports increased $1.8 billion in August 2021 compared with August 2020, resulting in a record monthly trade deficit of $2.1 billion, Stats NZ said today. Exports were little changed, down $42 million. "This is a larger deficit than normal because of higher values for imports.. More>>

Fonterra: Completes reset, announces annual results and long-term growth plan out to 2030

Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited today announced a strong set of results for the 2021 financial year, reflected in a final Farmgate Milk Price of $7.54, normalised earnings per share of 34 cents and a final dividend of 15 cents... More>>

Statistics: GDP rises in the June 2021 quarter

Gross domestic product (GDP) rose by 2.8 percent in the June 2021 quarter, following a 1.4 percent increase in the March 2021 quarter, Stats NZ said today. June 2021 quarter GDP was 4.3 percent higher when compared with the December 2019 quarter... More>>