Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

News Video | Policy | GPs | Hospitals | Medical | Mental Health | Welfare | Search

 

No Credible Evidence for Homeopathy: Pharmacists Must React

Press release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NHMRC Finds No Credible Evidence for Homeopathy: Pharmacists Must React


Following an extremely extensive and rigorous study, Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has published their final statement on the evidence regarding the use of homeopathic products in the treatment of health conditions. Their primary conclusion is:

"there are no health conditions for which there is reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective."

Many New Zealand pharmacies sell a range of homeopathic products. In September 2014, the Advertising Standards Authority upheld a complaint laid by the Society for Science Based Healthcare against an advertisement for a homeopathic jet lag prevention product (“No-Jet-Lag”) in an Auckland pharmacy, where an in-store display misleadingly claimed "it really works".

The pharmacy involved in the complaint agreed to stop selling this product in the event that the complaint was upheld, but this particular product is still promoted and sold in many pharmacies across the country. Many other homeopathic products, such as the New Zealand made NaturoPharm range, are also sold in many New Zealand pharmacies.

An industry code of ethics published by the Pharmacy Council of New Zealand requires that:

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

"[Pharmacists] must:... Only purchase, supply or promote any medicine, complementary therapy, herbal remedy or other healthcare product where there is no reason to doubt its quality or safety and when there is credible evidence of efficacy."

It is abundantly clear that this is not the case for any homeopathic product. As such, it is imperative that all responsible pharmacists should immediately stop promoting and selling homeopathic products in response to this report from the NHMRC.

Consumers should be able to rely on pharmacists and pharmacy sales assistants to only provide reliable healthcare advice and to only promote reliable healthcare products. Until pharmacies stop promoting and selling homeopathic products, this will not be the case.

________________________________________

Homeopathy is based on the principles that substances which cause symptoms in a healthy person can cure them in a sick person, and that more diluted substances have stronger effects. Homeopathic products are typically diluted to such an extreme level that no original ingredients are present in the final product.

The NHMRC assessed over 1,800 scientific papers in their review of the literature. Of these, 225 met their criteria that required they were well-designed with a sufficient sample size, and compared the experimental homeopathic treatment with a placebo.

Their conclusions should come as a surprise to no one familiar with the evidence for homeopathy. It has never been supported by the body of scientific evidence, and this is the latest in a long line of reports with essentially the same finding:

• In 2013, the NHMRC published a report based on their research that found:

• “There is a paucity of good-quality studies of sufficient size that examine the effectiveness of homeopathy as a treatment for any clinical condition in humans. The available evidence is not compelling and fails to demonstrate that homeopathy is an effective treatment for any of the reported clinical conditions in humans.”

• A 2010 report from the UK House of Commons concluded:

• "homeopathy is a placebo treatment."

• A 2010 systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy published in the Medical Journal of Australia concluded:

• "The findings of currently available Cochrane reviews of studies of homeopathy do not show that homeopathic medicines have effects beyond placebo."

• A 2002 systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology concluded that:

"the hypothesis that any given homeopathic remedy leads to clinical effects that are relevantly different from placebo or superior to other control interventions for any medical condition, is not supported by evidence from systematic reviews. Until more compelling results are available, homeopathy cannot be viewed as an evidence-based form of therapy."

Links


NHMRC final statement: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/cam02_nhmrc_statement_homeopathy.pdf

No-Jet-Lag Advertising Standards Authority complaint: http://asa.co.nz/display.php?ascb_number=14457

Pharmacy Council’s Safe Effective Pharmacy Code of Ethics 2011: http://www.pharmacycouncil.org.nz/cms_show_download.php?id=200

2013 NHMRC report: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/your_health/complementary_medicines/nhmrc_homeopathy_overview_report_october_2013_140407.pdf

2010 UK House of Commons report: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/45/45.pdf

2010 systematic review: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20402610

2002 systematic review: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01699.x/full


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Culture Headlines | Health Headlines | Education Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • CULTURE
  • HEALTH
  • EDUCATION
 
 
  • Wellington
  • Christchurch
  • Auckland
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.