Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

News Video | Policy | GPs | Hospitals | Medical | Mental Health | Welfare | Search

 

Pinochet case: Amnesty is studying the appeal

* News Release Issued by the International Secretariat of Amnesty International *

News Flash

22 October 1999

Pinochet case: Amnesty International is studying the appeal of the lawyers

Amnesty International has no information as to what the "habeas corpus" says. It was filed today by the lawyers of Augusto Pinochet as an appeal against a British magistrate’s decision to allow his extradition to Spain on torture charges.

The human rights organization takes notice of the "habeas corpus" submitted today by Augusto Pinochet’s lawyers regarding Judge Bartle’s decision of 8 October 1999.

Amnesty International will study carefully the contents of the "habeas corpus" to see which arguments in it touch upon Amnesty International’s concerns about impunity and the importance of the international crimes which motivated the decision to extradite.

"We are confident that the High Court will support the magistrate’s ruling in favour of extradition. Torture is an international crime and as such it must be punished", Amnesty International said.

Background Following the Habeas Corpus petition, the High Court has up to two weeks to decide whether the legal arguments presented justify a judicial hearing. A Habeas Corpus is the correct form to file an appeal in an extradition process. One High Court judge will give the decision on the application of the Habeas Corpus in what is known as ‘directions hearing’. This will be done either in a short court hearing or in ‘Chambers’.

If the application is accepted by the judge, a date will be set for the judicial hearing which will be heard by three High Court judges. It could be up to a month between the directions hearing and the judicial hearing. If the High Court judges’ decision is against extradition, Augusto Pinochet will be free, unless the Crown Prosecution Service - -representing the Spanish Government- appeals the decision.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

If the High Court Judges uphold Magistrate Ronald Bartle’s ruling (i.e. yes for extradition), the defence lawyers can request a leave to appeal to the House of Lords. If such appeal is not filed or leave is not granted, the whole issue passes to the UK Secretary of State for Home Affairs, Jak Straw, for a final decision. Mr. Jack Straw has up to 15 days to receive representations for and against extradition and up to two months to consider such representations and deliver his decision.

Jack Straw can either annul the judicial decision in favour of extradition on humanitarian or other grounds or uphold the extradition decision for Augusto Pinochet to be extradited to Spain.

In both case the interested party can appeal for a Judicial Review of Mr. Straw’s decision.

ENDS.../

Amnesty International, International Secretariat, 1 Easton Street,

WC1X 8DJ, London, United Kingdom

****************************************************************

You may repost this message onto other sources provided the main text is not altered in any way and both the header crediting Amnesty International and this footer remain intact.

****************************************************************


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Culture Headlines | Health Headlines | Education Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • CULTURE
  • HEALTH
  • EDUCATION
 
 
  • Wellington
  • Christchurch
  • Auckland
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.