Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Discussion Document On Economic Package Flawed

Discussion Document on $92 Million Economic Package Flawed

A discussion document issued yesterday to all West Coast household's seeking views on the entity to manage government's $92 million economic package has come under fire as being flawed and deficient, Scoop's West Coast correspondent, John Howard, reports.

The discussion document, jointly published by the Government and West Coast councils, puts up two possible options for an entity to manage the money - a charitable trust and a joint committee of councils.

A charitable trust, favoured by the regional council, provides for an appointing/governing body to be elected by an electoral college system - seemingly, the same type of system used in the US presidential elections which was recently criticised by Scoop columnist, Keith Rankin, as being bad democracy.

Coaster's are now saying very few New Zealanders would understand an electoral college system and, what's more, there are three other options which have not been canvassed in the discussion document - a separate committee with its own legislation, a foundation or a joint council committee with its own legislation.

The discussion document has also been slammed as unfair because it does not provide a method to allow each member of a household to record differing views.

The envelope was addressed to "The Householder" - much like some junk mail is addressed - and when opened just one opinion could be recorded.

Coaster's feel that's unfair because each member of a household may hold widely differing views yet there is no provision to express those views.

There are also fears that it may be seen as "junk mail" and consigned to the rubbish bin unopened.

Exactly why the Government, who authorised the final discussion document, did not use the electoral roll and the postal voting system currently used at local body elections, is unclear at the time of writing.

Meanwhile, the West Coast Times has published a report which says a top Wellington legal firm has slammed a report that favours a charitable trust which was commissioned by the West Coast Regional Council.

"Wellington legal firm, Simpson Grierson, levelled criticism at the regional council's report saying it makes incorrect assumptions and does not adequately explain why it favours a trust over a combined council committee," the paper said.

"Alarmed by attempts from several quarters to shape public thinking towards a trust prior to public consultation, the Coast's three district councils commissioned Simpson Grierson to critique the regional council's report," West Coast Times journalist, Ian Gill, wrote.

" If Simpson Grierson are right, the regional council report contains misleading information that has made its way into the public consultation document released on this issue yesterday." Mr Gill wrote.

It remains unclear how a charitable trust can be used for anything but charitable purposes. Coaster's are also asking if charity now includes economic development and business.

The Office of the Auditor-General has also been asked to make inquiries whether the regional council has authority under the Local Government Act to use ratepayers money to commission a report when economic development is not one of its core functions.

More than two years ago the West Coast Regional Council voted not to fund tourism from rates and Coaster's are now saying it can't have it both ways.

Like the three district councils, the regional council has already sliced $7 million off the top of the original $120 million which leaves the $92 million to invest.

A recommendation is to go forward to Government from some West Coaster's, asking it to place the $92 million in an interest bearing deposit account in favour of the West Coast until the matters raised can be resolved.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Julian Assange: A Thousand Days In Belmarsh
Julian Assange has now been in the maximum-security facilities of Belmarsh prison for over 1,000 days. On the occasion of his 1,000th day of imprisonment, campaigners, supporters and kindred spirits gathered to show their support, indignation and solidarity at this political detention most foul... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Mauling Of Novak Djokovic
Rarely can the treatment of a grand sporting figure by officialdom have caused such consternation. Novak Djokovic, the tennis World Number One, has always had a tendency to get under skin and constitution, creating a large following of admirers and detractors. But his current treatment by Australian authorities, and his subsequent detention as an unlawful arrival despite being granted a visa to participate in the Australian Open, had the hallmarks of oppression and incompetent vulgarity... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Voices Of Concern: Aussies For Assange’s Return

With Julian Assange now fighting the next stage of efforts to extradite him to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 of which are based on the brutal, archaic Espionage Act, some Australian politicians have found their voice. It might be said that a few have even found their conscience... More>>



Forbidden Parties: Boris Johnson’s Law On Illegal Covid Gatherings

It was meant to be time to reflect. The eager arms of a new pandemic were enfolding a society with asphyxiating, lethal effect. Public health authorities advocated various measures: social distancing, limited contact between family and friends, limited mobility. No grand booze-ups. No large parties. No bonking, except within dispensations of intimacy and various “bubble” arrangements. Certainly, no orgies... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Question Time Is Anything But
The focus placed on the first couple of Question Time exchanges between the new leader of the National Party and the Prime Minister will have seemed excessive to many but the most seasoned Parliamentary observers. Most people, especially those outside the Wellington beltway, imagine Question Time is exactly what it sounds... More>>



Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>