Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Howards End: Millenium Summit & Super-Colonialism

The end of the nation state is over. At least that's the impression after reading the working draft document for the United Nations Millennium Summit currently being held in New York. But is it really super-colonialism? John Howard writes.

In the largest gathering of presidents, prime ministers and princes in modern history, 150 world leaders have converged on the United Nations in New York for the Millennium Summit with an agenda to save the world.

Keen to regain lost credibility and to demand centre stage, the UN, after years of crises including notable UN peace-keeping failures, ongoing financial and management problems and a string of controversial world conferences that have caused a widening rift between the UN and many governments, the "President's Working Draft" reveals the agenda for the Summit.

The working draft has only just been released into the public arena.

In one of the seven sections the draft document calls on Summit participants to affirm their "faith in the Organisation and the Charter as indispensable foundations of a more peaceful, prosperous and just world."

Fair enough, but as usual the devil is in the detail.

Things like a global tax to fund the UN, a world environment court, a world criminal court, a world army of peace-keepers, the full ratification of seven existing international treaties, a new "Convention against Terrorism" and a world conference on nuclear disarmament.

Now, how could I object to that?

Problem is the UN calls it "global governance" which by any other name is super-colonialism or even world government.

The UN insists that global governance is not world government but the distinction is surely in the eyes of the beholder.

Indeed, the idea of the Millennium Summit is to have as many of the gathered heads of government authorise the UN to begin the implementation of a series of recommendations designed to bring about a new system of governance described by it as "global governance."

It seems to me that the Summit is designed to provide the UN with official authorisation to continue a process that has been underway for years - without the authorisation of the peoples' of the individual nation states.

In 1991 the EcoSocialist Review reported that global governance is ".....the subordination of national sovereignty to democratic transnationalism...."

In that year the Commission on Global Governance was conceived and in 1995 it released a 410 page report entitled "Our Global Neighbourhood."

Our Prime Minister, Helen Clark, is reported in the news this morning from New York saying that New Zealand supports sustainable globalisation.

At worst, global governance is a system of centralised control of an enormous bureaucracy through which public policies will be developed and administered.

All the past UN confererences and reports prior to this Millennium Summit have been nothing more than recommendations by the various UN organisations.

Adoption of a Millennium Declaration, or whatever it will be called, gives the UN official approval by the UN General Assembly and the heads of governments of the world, to now implement those recommendations.

But without any consultation or input from the people of each nation state.

This is the point of no return in which democratic transnationalism, global governance, world government, or whatever it will finally be called, will be our future.

Many people's of the world will see global governance as an improvement.

But to subordinate national sovereignty to an international power which, by definition, means freedom is a commodity to be granted or denied by that power is something, if we live in a democracy, that I would really liked to have been asked about.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Keith Rankin: Science, Scientists, And Scientism
Science, in the not-so-recent-past, has often had a bad press. It's been personified, particularly by the political left, as Frankenstein, as agents of capitalism, classical liberalism, colonialism, sexism (yang over yin), eugenics, and god-like pretension. More recently though, in the zeitgeists of climate change awareness and covid, it's had an unusually good press; although we retain this persistent worry that viruses such as SARS-Cov2 may be the unwitting or witting result of the work of careless or evil scientists... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Can ACT's Dream Run Continue?

By most reckonings the ACT Party has had a very successful political year. Not only has its expanded Parliamentary team settled in well to its work, without controversy or scandal, but its leader has gained in community respect, and the party’s support, at least according to the public opinion polls, has increased sharply... More>>

Keith Rankin: Basic Universal Income And Economic Rights
"Broad growth is only going to come when you put money in the hands of people, and that's why we talk about a Universal Basic Income". [Ritu Dewan, Indian Society of Labour Economics]. (From How long before India's economy recovers, 'Context India', Al Jazeera, 31 Oct 2021.) India may be to the 'Revolution of the twenty-first century' that Russia was to the 'Revolution of the twentieth century'... More>>



Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>

Globetrotter: Why Julian Assange’s Inhumane Prosecution Imperils Justice For Us All

When I first saw Julian Assange in Belmarsh prison, in 2019, shortly after he had been dragged from his refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy, he said, “I think I am losing my mind.”
He was gaunt and emaciated, his eyes hollow and the thinness of his arms was emphasized by a yellow identifying cloth tied around his left arm... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Labour's High Water Mark
If I were still a member of the Labour Party I would be feeling a little concerned after this week’s Colmar Brunton public opinion poll. Not because the poll suggested Labour is going to lose office any time soon – it did not – nor because it showed other parties doing better – they are not... More>>