Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Howard's End: Look Out China, The Net Is Watching

Now that China has been awarded the 2008 Olympic Games, business ethics are under scrutiny with potential corporate sponsors being asked by Internet consumers whether they will negotiate with human rights in mind. The web is watching. Maree Howard writes.

Some in the global business community are going to commit to the Beijing Olympic Games and do so quickly. Companies like Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Nike, GM and NBC are said to be lining up for a piece of the action.

Some companies are already in China so it's unlikely they will encourage any high profile debate about the business risks involved in joining hands with the hands which grab, imprison and execute.

But they should be warned!

Global consumers are already organising web-sites which will track potential Olympic sponsors and watch whether they make ethical decisions in their sponsorship deals with Beijing.

Human rights is the major issue facing the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games.

U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell said yesterday when speaking of China's successful bid for the Olympic Games, "I hope they know what they've got. Beijing will be under seven years of international supervision."

"I hope they will find that you can't continue with economic democracy without political democracy," he said

At a minimum, the questions which are most likely to be asked of the sponsoring corporates through websites are; will you negotiate with the Chinese government for the right to employ a Chinese person whom you see fit; will you ensure those people have free access to the Western media throughout the Games and; will you ensure they are protected from arbitrary detention both during and after the Games?

Another issue facing sponsoring corporates is the business risk they face if something like "Tiananmen - The Sequel" or other brutal suppression occurs within the next seven years. Or perhaps even regional armed conflicts involving China, India, Vietnam or Taiwan.

If any of these events occur would you regret your decision to sponsor the 2008 Games? That is a question which now faces corporate leaders should they decide to sign-up with shareholders funds to early sponsorship deals.

Would consumers hold your participation in the Beijing Games against your products? Coke, McDonald's, Nike, GM and NBC all face fierce competition in the marketplace so corporates interested in sponsorship would be wise to factor in a potential consumer backlash should any disastrous event unfold where their brand is involved.

The 1988 Olympics in Seoul spurred South Korea towards democracy. It is to be hoped that the 2008 Games will do the same for Beijing and China.

But China is a nation still locked in its social past. It is willingly pursuing economic reform with a great deal of economic liberalisation over the last 25 years. But democratic and human rights reform is light years away.

At the very least potential corporate sponsors had better take some backside covering advice and analysis on the ethics of corporate sponsorship with Beijing, prior to their decision to jump in boots and all.

The Internet consumer knows there is potentially $billions of profits to be made for an ethical company - the web is watching!


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>

Digitl: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?
In 1989 Charles Handy wrote The Age of Unreason. It's a book that looked forward to a time where telecommuting would be an everyday reality. We live in that world today, although we use the term working from home. The book contains other predictions that were on the money... More>>


Reactionary Succession: Peter Dutton, Australia’s New Opposition Leader
The devastation wrought on Australia’s Coalition government on May 21 by the electorate had a stunning, cleansing effect. Previously inconceivable scenarios were played out in safe, Liberal-held seats that had, for decades, seen few, if any challenges, from an alternative political force. But the survival of one figure would have proved troubling, not only to the new Labor government, but to many Liberal colleagues lamenting the ruins. The pugilists and head knockers, however, would have felt some relief. Amidst the bloodletting, hope... More>>


Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>




The Conversation: Cheaper food comes with other costs – why cutting GST isn't the answer

As New Zealand considers the removal of the goods and services tax (GST) from food to reduce costs for low income households, advocates need to consider the impact cheap food has on the environment and whether there are better options to help struggling families... More>>