Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Howard's End: $200 Barrier To Fair Representation

Someone in the Puzzle Palace in Wellington has decided in their wisdom to charge a $200 deposit for candidates putting themselves up for election to local councils and district health boards. Are the clowns now in charge of the circus? Maree Howard writes.

We live in a democracy - right? We're supposed to have free and fair elections - right? There's supposed to be fair and equal representation - right?

T'aint necessarily so!

The new Local Electoral Act 2001 says its principle is designed to ensure fair and effective representation for individuals and communities.

It has the lofty aim of providing a right to individuals to stand for election based on reasonable and equal opportunity.

It is supposed to provide flexibility and to modernise the law.

Then who was the moron who decided to pass regulations under the Act that requires a $200 deposit from candidates without also providing the opportunity for under-privileged people, who might also want to be candidates, to be able to pay it back over time?

Can some sane and sensible Scoop reader, all whom naturally have common sense, please explain to me how on earth a person on a weekly benefit, which can be less than the $200 deposit required, come up with that kind of money in one hit?

Boy, am I angry.

Some stupid, ignorant, arrogant, out-of-touch moron, has decided that everybody who might want to be a candidate for his/her local council or health board has $200 on tap.

No thought to what that amount of money might mean for some people. No thought in the regulation to providing an opportunity for people to be able to pay it back.

So listen-up morons! Get out of your ivory tower in the Puzzle Palace and forthwith direct all returning officers throughout the country that they can accept late nominations from people who cannot afford the $200 deposit and that they can also pay it back over a period of time.

It might mean that those potential candidates will need to swear a statutory declaration, but so what. Just bloody do it!

Otherwise the coming local council and health boards elections are not free, fair and equal, we do not live in a democracy and you, insensitive morons, should be banished to Antarctica forever. Come to think of it, the penguins probably wouldn't want you either.

A complaint has also been lodged about your uncaring and insensitive behaviour with the Human Rights Commission.

Last council elections I recall the deposit was $100 but now it’s increased by 100% - to $200. And this is a democracy of reasonable and equal opportunity? - Bullshit!


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>


The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>


Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>