Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Howard's End: Witnesses Refute Flight 587 Fallacy

Thirteen witnesses are now prepared to say that when Flight 587 out of JFK in New York crashed on November 12 killing all 265 on board, the tail did not mysteriously fall off. Truth will out! Maree Howard writes.

Scoop, along with a now increasing number of other media, has never been convinced with the explanations of the U.S. administration that Flight 587 simply came apart and crashed over Long Island.

Both then, and now, the explanations did not pass the smell test including by those in some of the media, the aviation industry and commercial pilots. (See… Howard's End - 20 November 2001)

Little wonder the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has now called on NASA to help them find the cause of the crash. The FBI has video tape footage of the take-off and climb out of Flight 587 which it will not, and has not, released or commented on.

But here they were, the NTSB, with 265 dead and God knows how many mourners giving us the claptrap that the tail mysteriously fell off.

"No tail fell off, not before the explosion. I swear that," said retired firefighter Tom Lynch, who was doing his exercise march along Rockaway Beach Boulevard on Nov. 12.

"I had my head up taking in that beautiful, clear day and was staring straight at the plane. It made a bank turn and suddenly there was an explosion, orange and black, on the right-hand side of the fuselage. It was a small explosion, about half the size of a car."

"The plane kept on going straight for about two or three seconds as if nothing happened, then 'vwoof' - the second big explosion on the right wing, orange and black," Mr Lynch said.

"It was only then that the plane fell apart. I'm telling you the tail was there until the second explosion," he said.

He has 13 other witnesses lined up to testify that they also saw the plane on fire before the breakup and before the explosion the tail was intact.

Mr Lynch has contacted the FBI, the NTSB, and New York Senators' Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer.

" I got no response from anyone," he said.

Sabotage? Cover-up?

Mr Lynch says "That's for other people to decide. At first, we hear there were seagulls in the engine, then the plane was caught in a jet stream and the tail fell off."

"Im telling you, no damn tail fell off until the second explosion," he said.

Then there's Jim Conrad - who retired last month as a police lieutenant after 34 years service.

He agree's with Tom Lynch. "I saw exactly what Tom saw."

"I was near a stop light at Marine Parway Bridge. First, the small explosion. The plane kept going, tail intact, then the big explosion and the plane nosedived."

The first thing I said was: 'The bastards did it again.'"

The NTSB now says it doesn't have any evidence of an explosion after searching the wreckage or from the cockpit voice recorder but concedes that that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

In the face of mounting evidence that there were two explosions on Flight 587 soon after take-off and that the tail did not simply fall off, the NTSB has a serious credibility problem. And the FBI? Well, it's conspicuous by its absence.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Binoy Kampmark: Totalitarian Cyber-Creep: Mark Zuckerberg In The Metaverse

Never leave matters of maturity to the Peter Panners of Silicon Valley. At their most benign, they are easily dismissed as potty and keyboard mad. At their worst, their fantasies assume the noxious, demonic forms that reduce all users of their technology to units of information and flashes of data... More>>

Keith Rankin: 'Influenza' Pandemics In New Zealand's Past
On Tuesday (16 Nov) I was concerned to hear this story on RNZ's Checkpoint (National distances itself from ex-MP after video with discredited academic). My concern here is not particularly with the "discredited academic", although no academic should suffer this kind of casual public slur. (Should we go further and call Simon Thornley, the academic slurred, a 'trailing epidemiologist'? In contrast to the epithet 'leading epidemiologist', as applied to Rod Jackson in this story from Newshub.) Academics should parley through argument, not insult... More>>

Digitl: When the internet disappears
Kate Lindsay writes about The internet that disappears. at Embedded. She says all that talk about the internet being forever is wrong. Instead: "...It’s on more of like a 10-year cycle. It’s constantly upgrading and migrating in ways that are incompatible with past content, leaving broken links and error pages in its wake. In other instances, the sites simply shutter, or become so layered over that finding your own footprint is impossible... More>>

Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>

Globetrotter: Why Julian Assange’s Inhumane Prosecution Imperils Justice For Us All

When I first saw Julian Assange in Belmarsh prison, in 2019, shortly after he had been dragged from his refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy, he said, “I think I am losing my mind.”
He was gaunt and emaciated, his eyes hollow and the thinness of his arms was emphasized by a yellow identifying cloth tied around his left arm... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Labour's High Water Mark
If I were still a member of the Labour Party I would be feeling a little concerned after this week’s Colmar Brunton public opinion poll. Not because the poll suggested Labour is going to lose office any time soon – it did not – nor because it showed other parties doing better – they are not... More>>