Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Guest Opinion: NZ Army Not Soldiers For Jesus

Soldiers For Jesus?
Just Whose Extra Mile Is It Anyway

By Richard Davis
* see author note…

I was both angered and amused to see a recent Army recruitment advertisement (The Dominion, 9 February, 2002). The text read "We're looking for people who go the extra mile (and that's just the warm-up)". Using the words of Jesus, the Prince of Peace, to recruit soldiers is bad enough, but when one looks closer at the source text and context it becomes downright sinister.

The immortal words of Jesus used in the advertisement are taken from Matthew 5:38-41: "You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.' But I say to you, Do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also; and if anyone wants to sue you and take your coat, give your cloak as well; and if anyone forces you to go one mile, go also the second mile. Give to everyone who begs from you, and do not refuse anyone who wants to borrow from you."

It is ironic for the Army to use part of a passage from which their very existence can be challenged. Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy built his entire anarchist-pacifist theology on these verses, especially Jesus' command "Do not resist an evildoer". His main exposition of this passage is found in his 'The Kingdom of God is Within You', which was a major influence on Gandhi and his practice of non-violent resistance. To Tolstoy soldiers are trained murderers, there to resist and kill evil-doers as defined by the state. Soldiers are not trained to turn the other cheek, but to strike first and retaliate. But more relevant is the understanding we have of the "go also the second mile".

American theologian Walter Wink has given a most interesting interpretation of this text. In Jesus' time Roman soldiers could force bystanders to carry their load for one mile, but no further. An apt example of this at Easter time is the case from Mark 15:21 where Simon of Cyrene was forced to carry Jesus' cross. If people were to carry a Roman soldiers load for more than the permitted one mile then that soldier could be disciplined by their commanding centurion, which may include a flogging or reduced rations. So why does Jesus' suggest going the second mile?

Wink writes: "Jesus does not encourage Jews to walk a second mile in order to build up merit in heaven, or to be pious, or to kill the soldier with kindness. He is helping an oppressed people find a way to protest and neutralize an onerous practice despised throughout the empire. He is not giving a nonpolitical message of spiritual world transcendence. He is formulating a worldly spirituality in which people at the bottom of society or under the thumb of imperial power learn to recover their humanity." ['The Powers That Be: Theology for a New Millennium' (1998), 108] Wink asks us to imagine the entertaining scene of a Roman soldier pleading with a Jew to have his pack back, to avoid punishment!

Jesus' suggestion to go the extra mile can be seen as advocating active (yet non-violent) protest against Rome's military occupation and a way to undermine their practice of impressed labour in support of military aims. Jesus' words cannot be a support to the military; he suggests action that frustrates and turns the tables on them. The Army is therefore quite wrong if they see this text as good promotional material, one hopes it may backfire.


* AUTHOR NOTE: Richard Davis - Communications Advisor, Presbyterian Church of Aotearoa New Zealand, http://www.presbyterian.org.nz/ - richardd@pcanz.org.nz

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 



Binoy Kampmark: Congress, Skulduggery And The Assange Case

Is the imperium showing suspicions about its intended quarry? It is hard to believe it, but the US House Intelligence Committee is on a mission of discovery. Its subject: a Yahoo News report disclosing much material that was already in the public domain on the plot to kidnap or, failing that, poison Julian Assange... More>>

The Conversation: Old wine in new bottles – why the NZ-UK free trade agreement fails to confront the challenges of a post-COVID world
When the sales pitch for a free trade agreement is that “British consumers will enjoy more affordable Marlborough sauvignon blanc, mānuka honey and kiwifruit, while Kiwis enjoy the benefit from cheaper gin, chocolate, clothing and buses”, you know this is hardly the deal of the century... More>>


Philip Temple: Hang On A Minute, Mate
Peter Dunne quietly omits some salient facts when arguing for retention of MMP’s coat-tailing provision that allows a party to add list seats if it wins one electorate and achieves more than 1% or so of the party vote... More>>



Dunne Speaks: Labour's High Water Mark
If I were still a member of the Labour Party I would be feeling a little concerned after this week’s Colmar Brunton public opinion poll. Not because the poll suggested Labour is going to lose office any time soon – it did not – nor because it showed other parties doing better – they are not... More>>



Our Man In Washington: Morrison’s Tour Of Deception

It was startling and even shocking. Away from the thrust and cut of domestic politics, not to mention noisy discord within his government’s ranks, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison could breathe a sign of relief. Perhaps no one would notice in Washington that Australia remains prehistoric in approaching climate change relative to its counterparts... More>>



Binoy Kampmark: Melbourne Quake: Shaken, Not Stirred

It began just after a news interview. Time: a quarter past nine. Morning of September 22, and yet to take a sip from the brewed Turkish coffee, its light thin surface foam inviting. The Australian city of Melbourne in its sixth lockdown, its residents fatigued and ravaged by regulations. Rising COVID-19 numbers, seemingly inexorable... More>>