Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

David Miller Online: US-Saudi Relations Fraying

David Miller Online

Why the US Will Not Deal With Saudi Support for Terror

According to Senator Joseph Lieberman the United States’ ties with Saudi Arabia have reached a "crisis stage". Senator Lieberman claims that this renewed strain is being driven by the US’ looming showdown with Iraq and allegations that a Saudi princess helped channel funds to two of the men involved in September 11.

These claims come in the wake of an inquiry by Congress’s Intelligence Committee reported that there is evidence showing that this transaction took place. Several Congressmen, including Mr. Lieberman are asking whether Saudi Arabia is doing enough to co-operate in the War on Terrorism and whether the Saudi’s are actually on the US’ side.

Until now, the US has adopted a ‘see no evil, hear no evil’ approach to Saudi Arabia. This is not the first time that the Saudis have been accused of providing shelter for al-Qaeda and other organisations and of being a financial sponsor of terrorism.

There is also the Saudi ruling that the US cannot use its territory as a launch point for any attack on Iraq, despite the large American military presence there and the outward impression that relations between Riyadh and Washington remain close. If Mr. Lieberman’s claims are correct then the closeness of this relationship is placed in serious doubt and it begs the question as to how long the Bush Administration can keep turning a blind eye to such allegations and the situation in Saudi Arabia.

Both the Bush Administration and the House of Saud are in a corner with this issue. The Saudi support was crucial during the 1991 Gulf War and it has remained a pillar in US Middle East policy ever since. The US has provided the Saudi’s with a defensive screen and deterrent against any possible Iraqi aggression while the Saudi’s continue to provide oil.

Oil is not the only concern for the US. Saudi Arabia wields powerful influence throughout the Persian Gulf region, especially among states such as Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. All of these are considered US allies and friends. Without that Saudi influence it is likely that the US would find it much more difficult to maintain these relationships. The US also feels that Saudi Arabia is in its debt after it helped protect the Kingdom from Iraqi aggression during the Gulf War and that its military deployment is a continuation of Operation Desert Shield.

For its part, the House of Saud must balance this relationship with the US with the growing dissatisfaction and Islamic resurgence among its own people.

Any dissent within Saudi Arabia has been stifled however if the dissidents begin to protest strongly against the American presence, then the royal family could also find their own position under threat. If there is a revolution within Saudi Arabia or the Royal Family lost their preeminent position then there will be dire consequences for the world.

Both the Bush Administration and the Saudi government have reached a point where they both need to make decisions about their relationship and what possible consequences that might bring. If there is evidence that elements within the Saudi government or population are helping to finance terrorism then the US government must either keep pretending it is not happening or take action of some sort.

The US must weigh up how much it relies on the Saudi co-operation before doing that, and if it feels that that support cannot be jeopardised then it must be prepared to face the accusations from its opponents at home. The Saudi’s must decide whether they can afford to lose the US as an ally or whether they feel strong enough to crack down on those supporting terrorism.

It is unlikely that they will do so hence they will continue to try and play both ends towards the middle. This will not matter to the Saudi’s; as it is unlikely the US will find the courage to take action even if the evidence of Saudi compliance in September 11 or al-Qaeda is overwhelming. After all, since the end of the Second World War, this has remained one of the world’s great marriages of convenience.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Julian Assange: A Thousand Days In Belmarsh
Julian Assange has now been in the maximum-security facilities of Belmarsh prison for over 1,000 days. On the occasion of his 1,000th day of imprisonment, campaigners, supporters and kindred spirits gathered to show their support, indignation and solidarity at this political detention most foul... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Mauling Of Novak Djokovic
Rarely can the treatment of a grand sporting figure by officialdom have caused such consternation. Novak Djokovic, the tennis World Number One, has always had a tendency to get under skin and constitution, creating a large following of admirers and detractors. But his current treatment by Australian authorities, and his subsequent detention as an unlawful arrival despite being granted a visa to participate in the Australian Open, had the hallmarks of oppression and incompetent vulgarity... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Voices Of Concern: Aussies For Assange’s Return

With Julian Assange now fighting the next stage of efforts to extradite him to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 of which are based on the brutal, archaic Espionage Act, some Australian politicians have found their voice. It might be said that a few have even found their conscience... More>>



Forbidden Parties: Boris Johnson’s Law On Illegal Covid Gatherings

It was meant to be time to reflect. The eager arms of a new pandemic were enfolding a society with asphyxiating, lethal effect. Public health authorities advocated various measures: social distancing, limited contact between family and friends, limited mobility. No grand booze-ups. No large parties. No bonking, except within dispensations of intimacy and various “bubble” arrangements. Certainly, no orgies... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Question Time Is Anything But
The focus placed on the first couple of Question Time exchanges between the new leader of the National Party and the Prime Minister will have seemed excessive to many but the most seasoned Parliamentary observers. Most people, especially those outside the Wellington beltway, imagine Question Time is exactly what it sounds... More>>



Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>