Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


E. Pringle: Bush Texas 2 Step - TeenScreen & TAMP

Bush Texas 2 Step - TeenScreen & TAMP

By Evelyn Pringle

On April 29, 2002, Bush established The New Freedom Commission by executive order. While speaking in New Mexico on that date, he said mental health centers and hospitals, homeless shelters, the justice and school systems have contact with individuals suffering from mental disorders but that too many Americans fall through the cracks of the current system and so he created the Commission to ensure “that the cracks are closed.”

On July 22, 2003, the NFC recommended redesigning the mental health systems in all 50 states. Its press release stated, "Achieving this goal will require greater engagement and education of first line health care providers—primary care practitioners—and a greater focus on mental health care in institutions such as schools, child welfare programs, and the criminal and juvenile justice systems. The goal is integrated care that can screen, identify, and respond to problems early," the release stated.

Two of the so-called model programs that Bush wants to establish in all 50 states are TeenScreen and TMAP. The truth is, this whole New Freedom facade is nothing more than elaborate profiteering scheme involving the Bush administration, local government officials, and the pharmaceutical industry to increase the market for the sale of expensive psychiatric drugs.

In a nutshell, this is how it works. First the TMAP was invented to open the door for the pharmaceutical industry to widen its market with potential customers in state institutions. And then TeenScreen was a follow-up invention to open the doors to the nation’s public school system.

There’s no doubt that TeenScreen’s widespread testing in schools will recruit hundreds of thousands if not millions of new customers for the drugs it promotes. Now that its got Bush’s permission, all TeenScreen has to do is refer the 52 million students to shrinks who will prescribe the most expensive drugs on the market, with much of the funding to cover the cost of the drugs coming from tax dollars funneled through Medicaid and other government funded programs.

It’s actually an amazing scheme when you think about it.


The original TMAP list of drugs for adults included Risperdal, Zyprexa, Seroqual, Geodone, Depakote, Paxil, Zoloft, Celexa, Wellbutron, Zyban, Remeron, Serzone, Effexor, Buspar, Adderall and Prozac.

The decision to adopt TMAP brought with it the mandate to use the recommended drugs on all patients in the state system. A doctor can not choose a generic drug until at least 2, often three, drugs on the list have failed. And even then the doctor must set down his or her rational in writing, and assume liability for deviating from the TMAP list.

With the support of Bush and the Texas Legislature, the drug guidelines were adopted and all Texas prisons and mental hospitals were made available for TMAP pilot projects. The pharmaceutical industry reaped a bonanza once those doors swung open but it wanted more. It wanted access to all the kids involved with state agencies.

So in 1997-98, with pharmaceutical industry funding, TMAP began working on the Texas Children’s Medication Algorithm Project. (TCMAP). A panel was assembled to determine which drugs would be best for the treatment of children and adolescents.

The panel soon decided a survey was unnecessary and said the same drugs being used on adults could be used on children. There were no studies or clinical trials reviewed whatsoever to support this consensus.

How could the drug companies pull this off? Because the members of the panel were on the take. For instance, one member of the panel was Graham Emslie, MD, Professor and Chair, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Texas Medical Center.

The website tracks drug company money to researchers and lists Emslie as: "Consultant to GlaxoSmithKline, Forest, and Pfizer. Receives research support from Eli Lilly, Organon, Religion, and Wyeth-Ayerst. Member of the speaker’s bureau for McNeil. ("Experience in the use of SSRIs and other antidepressants in children and teens")

The program that Bush pushed through in Texas that allows kids under the states care to be drugged, is still causing headaches for lawmakers today. According to an article by the Associated Press on February 09, 2005, “As lawmakers work to revamp Texas' foster care system, they also are reviewing the use of mind-altering drugs by foster children.”

In October, 2004, the Texas inspector general for the Health and Human Services Commission said his office interviewed staff at three state licensed wilderness camps, which provide care for some foster children, and found that the average child arrives on four or five psychotropic drugs.

In Texas, the costs of treating schizophrenia, bipolar conditions and depression have skyrocketed and surpassed the costs of drugs used to treat physical ailments, such as high blood pressure, respiratory problems and even chronic disorders like diabetes.

And tax payer are footing the bill. In addition to covering nearly 40% of the drugs for Medicaid recipients, Texas also spends about another $60 million a year on hundreds of thousands of prescription drugs for other state-funded programs at the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation and the Department of Criminal Justice, according to the Associated Press.

But more important then the money, some child advocates say that kids are being too heavily medicated once they get in the Texas foster care system. The children go into the system neurologically normal but leave neurologically damaged, Austin psychologist John Breeding said. He and other advocates are calling for strict rules on use of the drugs.

Breeding has authored several books on attention deficit disorders. He wants a ban on the use of any drug on kids if the FDA has not approved it for children, unless a doctor who is not a psychiatrist authorizes it. He also wants a doctor who is not a psychiatrist to review each case if a child is taking two or more prescriptions for a non-FDA approved psychotropic drugs.

"Children are not just placed on one drug. Typically, they're placed on two or three or we've seen literally up to 17 different drugs for the same child in foster care," Breeding said. "These drugs are used as a chemical restraint."

In an April, 2004 report, Texas Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn said the state exercises little meaningful oversight of the psychotropic medications. She recommended the state create a foster care medical review team to develop best practices for the appropriate use of the medication. She also said that foster care caseworkers, foster parents and parents should be required to sign authorizations for psychotropic medications to be given to foster children.

Keeton also blasted the agency for giving children drugs to make them docile and so ``doctors and drug companies can make a buck."

Drugging In Other States

Over the past several years, Texas style drugging of kids has spread to other states as well.

An Los Angeles Times investigation found that thousands of children in California’s state foster or group homes were being administered psychiatric drugs, mostly for the purpose of making the kids easier to manage. In LA County alone, dependency court judges approved requests to medicate 4,500 children per year in 2001.

The Miami Herald reported that one in three Florida children in state care were prescribed psychotropic drugs. The kid's files contained pre-signed, blank documents that provided "consent" for children to receive both medical treatment and psychotropic drugs. The files also showed that child protective service caseworkers routinely were allowed to provide consent for treatment and psychotropic drug use for children in their care, which violates Florida state law.

Many advocates believe youths aren't being given options such as counseling. Medications only help control symptoms, said Yvette McGee Brown, president of the Center for Child and Family Advocacy at Children's Hospital. Counseling helps children control their behaviors, feelings and thoughts. You can't put kids on a bunch of drugs, then take them off thinking they'll know how to cope, she said.

McGee is probably right because antidepressant prescriptions for children in the US increased over 500% from 1999 to 2003, and with tragic results. Eg: Paxil was one of the wonder drugs recommended by the original TCMAP panel and was prescribed to children when the drug was new and relatively untested.

It has since been linked to numerous violent and deadly side effects in adolescents. Lawsuits have named Paxil as the culprit in cases of murder, suicide, debilitating disease and school shootings. In June of 2003, the FDA issued a warning that Paxil should not be prescribed to persons under 18 due to an alarming number of suicides by kids on this drug.

In Ohio, the Medication Algorithm Project is called OMAP and just like in other states, it contains all of the most expensive psychotropic medications, and they are selling like hot cakes to children.

After concerns were raised in other states about the high number of children being medicated in foster care, residential treatment and youth prisons, a reporter for the Columbus Dispatch investigated the matter in Ohio. He discovered that 31% of children ages 6 to 18 in foster and group homes, were on mental-health medications in July, 2004. And 22% of the children in detention were on psychiatric drugs as of January, 2005, with many on five or more. See April 25, 2005 Columbus Dispatch.

The investigation found that nearly 40,000 Ohio children on Medicaid were taking drugs for anxiety, depression, delusions, hyperactivity and violent behavior as of July 2004, and that Ohio spent over $65 million on mental-health drugs for kids in 2004.

And as if that’s not bad enough, it gets worse. The investigation revealed that doctors in Ohio prescribed sedatives and mood-altering medications for nearly 700 babies and toddlers who were on Medicaid last summer in 2004.

Dozens of advocates, child-welfare workers and psychiatrists interviewed by The Dispatch questioned the wisdom of prescribing potent medications for so many young, vulnerable children and warned that less than 25% of these drugs have been adequately tested on children.

“Research shows that 0 to 3 are the most critical years for the development of children and their success in the future," said Patricia Amos, a member of the Family Alliance to Stop Abuse and Neglect in New Jersey. “How do we know we're not messing that up by starting children on one medication, then adding on another and another, until their brains are hyperaroused, overstimulated and permanently altered?"

There are reports that people are also being overmedicated for profit in Pennsylvania as well. While Pennsylvania was implementing its PennMap program, Dr Stefan Kruszewski was a psychiatric consultant for the Department of Health and Human Services. While he was in charge of the mental health programs, Kruszewski said that some patients were on as many as five neuroleptic psychiatric drugs at the same time. This is known as polypharmacy and is extremely dangerous, he said.

Kruszewhski also discovered corrupt financial relationships between Pennsylvania politicians and pharmaceutical representatives related to PennMap.

He discovered fraudulent medication billings to the government, and alleges that four children and one adult died while under the state’s care, after all 5 were prescribed lethal combinations of anti-psychotic drugs under the PennMap model. After he made these charges, he was not only denied access to the autopsy records, he was fired.

Allan Jones was an Investigator in the Pennsylvania Office of Inspector General (OIG), Bureau of Special Investigations, when the PennMap scheme was being implemented. He too provided the OIG with evidence that state employees were experimenting on mental health patients and reporting the results to drug companies. He also reported that state employees were accepting financial rewards from drug companies. Jones ended up being fired as well and has since filed a Whistleblower lawsuit.

Jones continues to aid investigators in their review of the policies related to state employees profiting from the pharmaceutical industry in several states around the country.

Drugging Kids - Extremely Profitable

This major marketing scheme has turned out to be very profitable. In 2002, drug companies made $12 billion in profits from antidepressants alone. Those numbers continue to grow, largely because of increasing use on children.

In 2004, the sale of Lilly's newest ADHD drug Strattera rose by 80% to $667 million.

Johnson & Johnson’s ADHD drug Concerta, an $11.8 billion purchase from Alza in 2001, also did well and even Novartis old stand-by Ritalin continues to make plenty of money.

But Adderall, is the most popular ADHD drug and its sales in 2004 rose 28%, capturing one-fourth of the US market. Its parent company, Shire, says it has plans to bring out four new drugs for treating the disorder in 2005.

The numbers are beginning to come in on TeenScreen’s success and rest assured its doing a great job recruiting new customers for the pharmaceutical companies all over the country.

But its not doing so good in Florida. Anti-Child Drugging Advocate, Ken Kramer has lead the fight to prevent TeenScreen from getting into schools in several counties in Florida. In Penellas Country he urged parents to send e-mails to School Board and voice their objections to the program and the Board received more than 700 e-mails.

Kramer won the battle in 2 large counties. According to the Jan 26, 2005 Tampa Tribune, Pinellas County School Board members refused to subject students to suicide screenings, quashing any hope of introducing a controversial mental health plan in two of Florida's largest school districts.

To protect its students from issues of privacy and wrongful labeling, Pinellas County's School Board voted 6-1 to bar TeenScreen's suicide questionnaire program, the PR Web reported on Jan 30, 2005. Administrators in the Hillsborough County school district also considered the program, and determined the survey was too invasive.

In addition to his efforts in Florida, Kramer is also working with other individuals to get TeenScreen banned from schools in other parts of the country.


Evelyn Pringle

(Evelyn Pringle is a columnist for Independent Media TV and an investigative journalist focused on exposing corruption)

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Fatuous Defence: Australia’s Guided Missile Plans

Even in times of pandemic crises, some things never change. While Australia gurgles and bumbles slowly with its COVID-19 vaccine rollout, there are other priorities at stake. Threat inflators are receiving much interest in defence, and the media ... More>>

Richard S. Ehrlich: Cambodia's Hun Sen Feels Politically Vaccinated

BANGKOK, Thailand -- When Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen received his AstraZeneca vaccination shot, he suddenly felt invulnerable and vowed to rule indefinitely. Hun Sen is already one of the world's longest ruling prime ministers, confident his successor ... More>>

Reese Erlich: Foreign Correspondent: My Final Column?

I’m dying. It’s not easy to write these words. But it’s true. More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Brawling Over Vaccines: Export Bans And The EU’s Bungled Rollout
The European Union has been keeping up appearances in encouraging the equitable distribution of vaccines to combat SARS-CoV-2 and its disease, COVID-19. Numerous statements speak to the need to back the COVAX scheme, to ensure equity and that no one state misses out... More>>

Jennifer S. Hunt: Trump Evades Conviction Again As Republicans Opt For Self-Preservation

By Jennifer S. Hunt Lecturer in Security Studies, Australian National University Twice-impeached former US President Donald Trump has evaded conviction once more. On the fourth day of the impeachment trial, the Senate verdict is in . Voting guilty: ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Let The Investigation Begin: The International Criminal Court, Israel And The Palestinian Territories

International tribunals tend to be praised, in principle, by those they avoid investigating. Once interest shifts to those parties, such bodies become the subject of accusations: bias, politicisation, crude arbitrariness. The United States, whose legal and political ... More>>