Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Dunne's Relationship With The Exclusive Brethren

9 September 2005

Peter Dunne's Relationship With The Exclusive Brethren


By Kevin List

United Future's Peter Dunne and the Green Party's Jeanette Fitzsimons.

**********

Although the Exclusive Brethren keep away from the secular world for much of the time, last year they lobbied MP's on two separate pieces of legislation - the Employment Relations Law Reform Bill and the Civil Union Bill.

United Future leader Peter Dunne confirmed to Scoop today that Mr Timothy Lough, one of the men behind the anti-Labour and anti-Green Party smear pamphlets, had sought his assistance regarding last years Employment Relations Law Reform Bill.

"There is a very strong Exclusive Brethren community in my electorate – they came to see me and lobbied me on [conscientious objection from unions]. I thought that made perfect sense. I've supported amendments in that regard over the years. That was the last time I spoke to them," explained Mr Dunne.

Mr Lough explained to Scoop the changes the Exclusive Brethren wanted to the Employment Relations Bill regarded extending, 'the conscience provision in the law that was already there for exemption from union access – to apply to companies.'

Mr Lough, who lives in Johnsonville went to see Peter Dunne because he was the local MP and, "a nice chap too."

The amendment to the legislation, which was moved by Mr Dunne, was ultimately unsuccessful when the Green Party joined Labour, the Progressives and the Maori Party in voting against it. The Greens had supported a similar amendment to the Employment Relations Act in 2000 regarding the Exclusive Brethren.

Progressive Party leader Jim Anderton told Scoop how he had also been lobbied by the Exclusive Brethren - this time in 2000 - regarding the Employment Relations Act.

"I was approached by the Exclusive Brethren to agree to an exemption allowing them to discriminate against non-christians in the workplace and I said that would be impossible in New Zealand," he said.

Mr Anderton was scathing regarding parties that would support the Exclusive Brethren getting special exemptions in employment legislation.

"When I pointed out [to the Exclusive Brethren in 2000] that you had to have fair industrial relations and you can't discriminate against people on the grounds of race creed or colour I didn't get half a million dollars thrown at me assisting my election campaign," he said in reference to the Exclusive Brethren pamphlet campaign supporting the National Party, launched a week ago.

When asked if the same group of Brethren that lobbied him on the Employment Relations Bill, lobbied him later in 2004 regarding the Civil Union Bill , Mr Dunne told Scoop.

"I think they probably did but I really can't remember."

Mr Dunne explained that because he had moved the amendment proposing the Exclusive Brethren's workplaces and schools be exempt from unions it was easier to recall.

Mr Dunne also denied introducing either Mr Lough, or any of the Exclusive Brethren that he had assisted with the Employment Relations Bill, to any National Party MP's.

For his part Mr Lough explained that he had only met National's leader Dr Brash twice in his life, once a year ago and once last week in Masterton.

Mr Lough was adamant that when he met Dr Brash in Masterton last weekend he had not mentioned the anti-Green Party pamphlet drop that was occurring throughout the country that day, funded by the Exclusive Brethren.

"I shook his hand and said 'we are praying for you, Don'", said Mr Lough.

Mr Lough told Scoop that he had not attended the 20 minute meeting attended by other Exclusive Brethren with Dr Brash where the plan for delivering pamphlets attacking the current Government was discussed.

The media scrutiny that Mr Lough and his fellow Exclusive Brethren members had been under was affecting family life according to Mr Lough.

"I'm just one of these chaps that tries to do all [I] can for the country," he said.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Binoy Kampmark: A Looting Matter: Cambodia’s Stolen Antiquities

Cambodia has often featured in the Western imagination as a place of plunder and pilfering. Temples and artefacts of exquisite beauty have exercised the interest of adventurers and buccaneers who looted with almost kleptocratic tendency. In 1924, the French novelist and future statesman André Malraux, proved himself one of Europe’s greatest adventurers in making off with a ton of sacred stones from Angkor Wat... More>>



Dunne Speaks: Labour Leadership Speculation Premature And Facile
Speculation that the Prime Minister’s leadership of the Labour Party may be at risk because of this week’s adverse poll results is as exaggerated as it is premature and facile. While her popularity has plummeted from the artificially stellar heights of a couple of years ago and is probably set to fall further to what would be a more realistic assessment... More>>




Ian Powell: Colossal ‘Porkies’ And Band-aids Don’t Make A Health Workforce Plan

On 1 August Minister of Health Andrew Little announced what he described as the start of a plan for the beleaguered workforce in Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system: Government’s 5 year late health workforce announcement. In October 2017, when Labour became government with its two coalition parties, it inherited a health workforce crisis from the previous National-led government... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: The Fuss About Monkeypox
The World Health Organization has been one of the easier bodies to abuse. For parochial types, populist moaners and critics of international institutions, the WHO bore the brunt of criticisms from Donald Trump to Jair Bolsonaro. Being a key institution in identifying public health risks, it took time assessing the threat posed by SARS-CoV-2 and its disease, COVID-19... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Time For MPs To Think For Themselves
One of the more frequently quoted statements of the Irish statesman and philosopher, Edmund Burke, was his observation that “Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgement, and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion.”... More>>