Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Brash Sticks To 2005 Story Over Brethren Contacts

Brash Sticks To 2005 Story Over Brethren Contacts

National Leader Dr Don Brash surrounded by media following the revelation that the book he successfully legally suppressed last Friday was written by Nicky Hager – and titled 'The Hollow Men'

*********

Following the revelation's this morning that respected researcher/investigative journalist Nicky Hager had written a currently legally suppressed book detailing the ins and outs of National under the leadership of Dr Don Brash – the National Leader kindly agreed to take a few questions from the media this afternoon.

Last week Dr Brash obtained a High Court order restraining the publication or distribution of copies of email correspondence leaked from within the National Party – some of which allegedly went into the creation of Mr Hager's book 'The Hollow Men'.

As none of the journalists present at today's short media conference were legally able to read the book which has caused Dr Brash to seek such extreme measures to suppress its content the media were somewhat hampered in what questions to actually ask Dr Brash.

However at this morning's press conference given by Mr Hager copies of 'The Hollow Men's' table of contents were released. Chapter One – presumably the chapter that will be the most hard hitting and cause Dr Brash the most trouble evidently deals with Dr Brash's uneasy alliance with the ultra fundamentalist Christian sect – the Exclusive Brethren.

Scoop Media and TV3 asked Dr Brash a number of questions related to his dealings with the Exclusive Brethren. Out of these questions it was discovered that Dr Brash had no knowledge whatsoever of any plan the Exclusive Brethren may have had to attack the Green Party prior to last years election – this was despite the fact the Exclusive Brethren had attacked the Tasmanian Green Party in exactly the same way the year before (2004).

Dr Brash also pointed out to TV3's Duncan Garner that as far as he could recall "I don't think I have ever had an email from the Exclusive Brethren."

Part of Dr Brash's reasoning for seeking the High Court injuction suppressing the book was to do with the privacy of people who may wish to send him emails.

PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT:

**********

Duncan Garner (TV3): He says this book will prove that you knew about the Brethren and the dealings with the Brethren a long time before you came clean during the election campaign?

Dr Brash: Well I'll be very interested to hear what he has to say.

**********

Kevin List (Scoop Media): Dr Brash could you just clear up whether you knew that the Brethren were going to attack the Greens? Did you know about that?

Brash: I did not. What the Brethren told me in August 2005 - and I made that very clear several times - was that they were going to issue some pamphlets attacking the Government.

Kevin list: You knew nothing about Tasmania the year before?

Dr Brash: No! When Rod Donald showed me an anti-Green pamphlet two weeks before the election, he said did I put it out? I said no. He said, did I know who put it out? I said no.

Kevin List: So you knew nothing about the Exclusive Brethren and their attack on the Greens the year before?

Dr Brash: I did not.

**********

Duncan Garner (TV3): Do you know in 2005 when you first met the Brethren? When they first became interested in helping the National Party in the campaign, so look at when the election was and try to remember when your first meeting was, or a phone call, or an email. Do you remember?

Dr Brash: No I don't. I don't think I have ever had an email from the Exclusive Brethren.

Unknown Reporter: Can you say when you first became aware they were going to put out those pamphlets?

Dr Brash: To the best of my recollection it would have been August 2005.

Duncan Garner: And there was nothing earlier in the year?

Dr Brash: I met them earlier in the year but there was no discussion about issuing pamphlets. And certainly not anti-Green pamphlets.

Unknown: How about other senior members of your team?

Dr Brash: To my knowledge they had no particular meetings with….

Duncan Garner: And who set up those meetings? Do you remember?

Dr Brash: They did.

Garner: They rang you?

Dr Brash: Yeah. Well they may have rung my secretary.

Duncan Garner: And you agreed to meet them why?

Dr Brash: I agree to meet anyone from the community who has a legitimate interest in talking to politicians.

Duncan Garner: And did they offer you any financial support at the meeting?

Dr Brash: No. No they didn't. No financial support was offered from or received from the Exclusive Brethren.

….

Duncan Garner: Have you got anything to hide Dr Brash?

Dr Brash: Not to my knowledge.

Duncan Garner: So why don't you let this book be published?

Dr Brash: He has said that he is caught by the injunction. What we have said is that it is inappropriate to have stolen material published for the world to see. People have a right to expect their correspondence to MPs will be kept confidential.

Scoop Note: Dr Brash decided not to answer a question about whether or not he intended to read the book that he has successfully suppressed.

************

Listen to the full press conference

Scoop Audio.Scoop Streaming Audio: National Leader Dr Don Brash answers questions about the book he doesn't want NZ to read (and hasn't yet read himself)

Click here to download file
(mp3)

ENDS


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Keith Rankin: Science, Scientists, And Scientism
Science, in the not-so-recent-past, has often had a bad press. It's been personified, particularly by the political left, as Frankenstein, as agents of capitalism, classical liberalism, colonialism, sexism (yang over yin), eugenics, and god-like pretension. More recently though, in the zeitgeists of climate change awareness and covid, it's had an unusually good press; although we retain this persistent worry that viruses such as SARS-Cov2 may be the unwitting or witting result of the work of careless or evil scientists... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Can ACT's Dream Run Continue?

By most reckonings the ACT Party has had a very successful political year. Not only has its expanded Parliamentary team settled in well to its work, without controversy or scandal, but its leader has gained in community respect, and the party’s support, at least according to the public opinion polls, has increased sharply... More>>

Keith Rankin: Basic Universal Income And Economic Rights
"Broad growth is only going to come when you put money in the hands of people, and that's why we talk about a Universal Basic Income". [Ritu Dewan, Indian Society of Labour Economics]. (From How long before India's economy recovers, 'Context India', Al Jazeera, 31 Oct 2021.) India may be to the 'Revolution of the twenty-first century' that Russia was to the 'Revolution of the twentieth century'... More>>



Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>

Globetrotter: Why Julian Assange’s Inhumane Prosecution Imperils Justice For Us All

When I first saw Julian Assange in Belmarsh prison, in 2019, shortly after he had been dragged from his refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy, he said, “I think I am losing my mind.”
He was gaunt and emaciated, his eyes hollow and the thinness of his arms was emphasized by a yellow identifying cloth tied around his left arm... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Labour's High Water Mark
If I were still a member of the Labour Party I would be feeling a little concerned after this week’s Colmar Brunton public opinion poll. Not because the poll suggested Labour is going to lose office any time soon – it did not – nor because it showed other parties doing better – they are not... More>>