Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Indo-Pak: People Need Actions Not Promises

Indo-Pak: People Need Actions Not Promises

By Syed Atiq ul Hassan, Sydney

Carrying the passengers of divided families between India and Pakistan to Lahore from Delhi, the Samjhuta (means accord) Express train was attacked and turned into rubbles by the terrorists using fire and suitcase bombs. The conflagrated human bodies draped under wreckage were beyond recognition. The early morning of Monday the 19th of February (2007) was another dark day in the long disputed history of Indo-Pak relations.

According to the official figures, the incident left 66 passengers died and several brutally injured. Just after the incident, the leaders of both India and Pakistan strongly condemned the attack and again proclaimed not to derail the ongoing peace process between the two rival countries.

Principally, on should appreciate the assenting statements of Indian and Pakistani leaders. However, the statements of condolence and sympathy can not bring back the human losses and cannot deliver contentment to those who lost their love ones.

How long this peace process will continue? When will the governments of India and Pakistan resolve their differences? And, when will the governments of both the countries provide security to their people from the acts of terrorism seen over and over again? After every dreadful incident the leaders of India and Pakistan promise to punish the culprits and eliminate the terrorism. Yet, the leaders of both the countries failed to provide any timeframe except the hopes and inspirations.

This is not the recent time when Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf and former Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and now the current Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh and their respected governments are asserting to continue the peace negotiations and resolve their geo-political disputes despite the incidents of terrorism time and again.

It is the bitter reality that the game of peace and threat has been the part of the diplomacy process between the governments of India and Pakistan for the last half a century. From Ayub Khan, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Zia ul Haq to Nawaz Sharif of Pakistan to Shaistry, India Ghandi to Rajive Ghandi, the leaders of both Pakistan and India have been found vocalizing the needs of peace & harmony, signing accords, initiating peace proposals and affirming to resolve their geo-political disputes. Yet, as the situation of mistrust, threat and inflexibility still stand all their memorandums of understanding (MoU) have been found to be the manifestos of self interest and the interest of their parties in power.

It has been less than a year when, in July, 2006, series of bombs were blown in a crowded commuter train in Mumbai killed 174 and injured more than 400 people. Same kind of assurance of providing safety & security were made by the Indian government followed by Pakistan’s condemnation with declaration to work closely with Indian counterparts to find the culprits.

The recent exploded train was a border-crossing security-sealed train where the passengers and their baggage are supposed to be checked thoroughly. That means the terrorists must have been gone through the security and immigration checks successfully before boarded on the train. At one side the government of India and Pakistan are claiming that they are going through a critical time and making huge efforts to maintain peace process. On the other side, the responsible government agencies of India and Pakistan are failed to maintain adequate security at public and sensitive places to make sure that no one should try to sabotage their efforts of bringing the friendly relations.

The international community expects from India and Pakistan that both the countries should show confidence among themselves and each other to move forward, work together closely launch practical step to complete their process of resolving issues, as soon as possible. The proposals and plans can only be transformed into successful implementation when the leaders of both the countries think in the interest of the people of entire region, the stability of the entire region and work within a clear cut time frame. Now the question is; will this be possible.

How can the governments of India and Pakistan control the terrorism when almost in government agency there is high level of corruption in both the countries? Just paying small money to the person on duty anyone can cross the security checks successfully.

Maintaining security, Law and Order and safe environment for every citizen is a systemic process. While the population growth of the subcontinent is at its alarming stage, the people are still suffering of basic necessities of daily life. Law & Order, Health, Social Security and Justice Systems are below the standards. On the other hand, the funds that should be used to provide basic facilities to the people and eliminate corruption from the society are spent on developing nuclear weapons and long range missiles.

The international community and the people of Indo-Pak can not afford to see more innocent lives to be on the mercy of terrorists. Similarly, the process of reconciliation and negotiations should be now moved to the next phase of declaring and implementing resolutions.

Let’s take for instance, the core issue of Kashmir between India and Pakistan. Both the countries have been lingering the dispute for the last 50 years and fought three major wars. In the last few years Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf and Indian leadership from former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee to the current Prime Minster Dr. Manmohan Singh claimed their sincerity in resolving the dispute, yet both the parties failed to come out with any proposal to offer to the people of Kashmir.

The years long process of talks and negotiation must now deliver the accord. The leadership of both India and Pakistan should show courage and ability to put forward the plan on the basis of ‘give and take’ by the parties involved. Options like; (1) Declare both Indian and Pakistani controlled Kashmir as an independent state with no control of Pakistani and Indian administration but international monitoring forces until Kashmiri themselves able to establish their own security forces (2) Declare the Line of control as an official border of Pakistan and Kashmir with ban on all the freedom activities in Kashmir (3) Both Indian and Pakistani controlled parts of Kashmir should be provided real liberty to have their own governments with no interference of India and Pakistan. Both the parts of Kashmir would have soft border allowing people of Kashmir for easy transit and trade between two parts. The details on the settlement must be worked out by all three parties; Kashmiris, Pakistanis, and Indians. (4) Hand over both parts of the Kashmir to joint Indo-Pak administration and so on. These options or any other, one can only hope that the leaderships of both the countries should realize that the timing is running out and delay in finding the resolutions will only help to those elements who don’t want the people of both the nations live in peace and harmony.


(The Writer is a Sydney based journalist and an analyst).

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Globetrotter: The Geopolitics Behind Spiraling Gas And Electricity Prices In Europe
The current crisis of spiraling gas prices in Europe, coupled with a cold snap in the region, highlights the fact that the transition to green energy in any part of the world is not going to be easy. The high gas prices in Europe also bring to the forefront the complexity involved in transitioning to clean energy sources... More>>

Julian Assange: A Thousand Days In Belmarsh
Julian Assange has now been in the maximum-security facilities of Belmarsh prison for over 1,000 days. On the occasion of his 1,000th day of imprisonment, campaigners, supporters and kindred spirits gathered to show their support, indignation and solidarity at this political detention most foul... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Mauling Of Novak Djokovic
Rarely can the treatment of a grand sporting figure by officialdom have caused such consternation. Novak Djokovic, the tennis World Number One, has always had a tendency to get under skin and constitution, creating a large following of admirers and detractors. But his current treatment by Australian authorities, and his subsequent detention as an unlawful arrival despite being granted a visa to participate in the Australian Open, had the hallmarks of oppression and incompetent vulgarity... More>>

Off To The Supreme Court: Assange’s Appeal Continues

With December’s High Court decision to overturn the lower court ruling against the extradition of Julian Assange to the United States, lawyers of the WikiLeaks founder immediately got busy... More>>

Forbidden Parties: Boris Johnson’s Law On Illegal Covid Gatherings

It was meant to be time to reflect. The eager arms of a new pandemic were enfolding a society with asphyxiating, lethal effect. Public health authorities advocated various measures: social distancing, limited contact between family and friends, limited mobility. No grand booze-ups. No large parties. No bonking, except within dispensations of intimacy and various “bubble” arrangements. Certainly, no orgies... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Question Time Is Anything But
The focus placed on the first couple of Question Time exchanges between the new leader of the National Party and the Prime Minister will have seemed excessive to many but the most seasoned Parliamentary observers. Most people, especially those outside the Wellington beltway, imagine Question Time is exactly what it sounds... More>>