Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Scott Galindez: Shame on You, Ann Coulter II

Shame on You, Ann Coulter II

By Scott Galindez
t r u t h o u t | Managing Editor

Monday 05 March 2007

The most popular column I ever wrote for Truthout was a response to Ann Coulter's disgusting attacks against Max Cleland. We are now in another election cycle, and Ann Coulter again is making tasteless comments.

Speaking Friday at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington, D.C., Coulter closed her remarks with: "I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,' so I - so kind of an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards."

What was she thinking? Ann, it's 2007, and you are how old? This reminds me of a grade school attack by a bully who knows he can't win an intellectual argument, so he calls the kid with brains a "fag."

Ann, you can't attack Edwards on the issues: he has a health care plan, a plan to attack poverty, and wants to get us out of Iraq. When John Edwards speaks, he shows a grasp of the issues that we have not seen from our president over the last six and a half years. Is that what scares you? An articulate candidate who is ready to tackle big issues? Usually bullies resort to name-calling when they're afraid. What are you afraid of, Ann?

This is not the first time Coulter has called political adversaries "fags." On the July 27, 2006, edition of MSNBC's "Hardball," host Chris Matthews asked right-wing pundit Coulter, "How do you know that Bill Clinton is gay?" The question was in reference to her comment the night before on CNBC's "The Big Idea With Donny Deutsch" that Clinton shows "some level of latent homosexuality." Coulter responded, "I don't know if he's gay. But Al Gore - total fag.

OK, I hear you, Ann Coulter supporters, the few of you who can defend such statements. You are saying it was satire, she was joking.... Was she joking when she said: "If Cleland had dropped a grenade on himself at Fort Dix rather than in Vietnam, he would never have been a US senator in the first place. Maybe he'd be the best pharmacist in Atlanta," Coulter said in her column, published on February 11, 2004.

"He didn't 'give his limbs for his country' or leave them 'on the battlefield,'" Coulter said. "There was no bravery involved in dropping a grenade on himself with no enemy troops in sight."

Cleland in fact picked up a grenade that was dropped by another soldier, thinking it was his own.

Was she joking when she said, "These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis. I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much."

In the above statement, Coulter was referring to the Jersey Girls, a group of 9/11 widows who have been seeking answers and have been critical of the Bush administration's handling of 9/11.

She went on to ask why the "harpies" (she suggested they might have been divorced by their husbands had they lived) couldn't just "take the money and shut up about it." She wouldn't concede that they would rather have their husbands than a million dollars, and wondered, "Do I have to kill my mother so I can be a victim too?"

I can go on and on here ... she has the right to say whatever she wants, but at some point responsible media and political organizations should stop giving her the megaphone that ensures that the rest of us have to hear her hate. I'm sure that it's only a matter of time before I have to write. "Shame on You, Ann Coulter III."


Scott Galindez is the Managing Editor of Truthout.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Julian Assange: A Thousand Days In Belmarsh
Julian Assange has now been in the maximum-security facilities of Belmarsh prison for over 1,000 days. On the occasion of his 1,000th day of imprisonment, campaigners, supporters and kindred spirits gathered to show their support, indignation and solidarity at this political detention most foul... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Mauling Of Novak Djokovic
Rarely can the treatment of a grand sporting figure by officialdom have caused such consternation. Novak Djokovic, the tennis World Number One, has always had a tendency to get under skin and constitution, creating a large following of admirers and detractors. But his current treatment by Australian authorities, and his subsequent detention as an unlawful arrival despite being granted a visa to participate in the Australian Open, had the hallmarks of oppression and incompetent vulgarity... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Voices Of Concern: Aussies For Assange’s Return

With Julian Assange now fighting the next stage of efforts to extradite him to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 of which are based on the brutal, archaic Espionage Act, some Australian politicians have found their voice. It might be said that a few have even found their conscience... More>>

Forbidden Parties: Boris Johnson’s Law On Illegal Covid Gatherings

It was meant to be time to reflect. The eager arms of a new pandemic were enfolding a society with asphyxiating, lethal effect. Public health authorities advocated various measures: social distancing, limited contact between family and friends, limited mobility. No grand booze-ups. No large parties. No bonking, except within dispensations of intimacy and various “bubble” arrangements. Certainly, no orgies... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Question Time Is Anything But
The focus placed on the first couple of Question Time exchanges between the new leader of the National Party and the Prime Minister will have seemed excessive to many but the most seasoned Parliamentary observers. Most people, especially those outside the Wellington beltway, imagine Question Time is exactly what it sounds... More>>

Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>