Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Get It Straight: Repeal Section 59 And Cut Crime

Anne Else's Letter from Elsewhere

Get It Straight: Repeal Section 59 And Help To Cut Crime

Wilful stupidity is really hard to deal with, but I’m going to try. The Sensible Sentencing Trust has just managed to pull off a difficult feat. In a strong field of stupid statements, its latest one on Sue Bradford’s Bill stands out for its utter idiocy.

In a nutshell, the Trust is telling Ministers and the public “Ban-smacking today / Build Prisons tomorrow”. In other words, repealing section 59 and removing the “reasonable force” defence for assaulting children will produce more criminals.

This claim is not just wrong, it is the complete opposite of the facts. Maltreating children in general, and assaulting them in particular, is very strongly linked with later criminal behaviour. Go into any prison and ask how many of the inmates were not frequently hit as children. You won’t get many hands up.

But don’t take my word for it – look at the research. Please. The clearest recent evidence comes from an April 2006 study called “Does Child Abuse Cause Crime?”* It looked at all the available US evidence on whether maltreatment of children was linked with later committing of crimes. The authors say that to their knowledge, “this is the first study of the effect of child abuse on future criminality in the economics literature”. (Given the high cost of crime, that’s odd, isn’t it.)

Overall, they found that child maltreatment roughly doubles the probability that an individual will engage in many types of crime. Having a parent who ever struck, hit or kicked them clearly increases the probability that an individual will undertake criminal activity, although as you would expect, the effect tends to be greater if the parent struck them frequently.

In other words, it is precisely the kind of physical abuse of children which Sue Bradford’s Bill is designed to make indefensible that is most strongly linked with later criminal behaviour. The only kind of maltreatment that is more strongly linked with committing crimes later is childhood sexual abuse. Oh, and poverty makes it all worse. If you’re poor and hit often as a child, you have a very high chance of ending up in prison.

Assaulting children is an activity in which New Zealand can fairly be called world-beating. Repealing section 59 will not directly stop this. What it will do is prevent the assaulting parents who get caught from getting off by claiming that they were simply using “reasonable force”. Over time, it will help to change the way we treat our children – and so go a long way towards cutting crime and halting the growth in the prison roster.

* Janet Currie [Columbia University, UCLA and NBER Department of Economics] and Erdal Tekin [Georgia State University and NBER Department of Economics], “Does Child Abuse Cause Crime?” April 2006, http://aysps.gsu.edu/publications/2006/downloads/CurrieTekin_ChildAbuse.pdf

(accessed 26/3/07)

*************

- Anne Else is a Wellington writer and social commentator. Her occasional column will typically appear on a Monday. You can subscribe to receive Letter From Elsewhere by email when it appears via the Free My Scoop News-By-Email Service

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Julian Assange: A Thousand Days In Belmarsh
Julian Assange has now been in the maximum-security facilities of Belmarsh prison for over 1,000 days. On the occasion of his 1,000th day of imprisonment, campaigners, supporters and kindred spirits gathered to show their support, indignation and solidarity at this political detention most foul... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Mauling Of Novak Djokovic
Rarely can the treatment of a grand sporting figure by officialdom have caused such consternation. Novak Djokovic, the tennis World Number One, has always had a tendency to get under skin and constitution, creating a large following of admirers and detractors. But his current treatment by Australian authorities, and his subsequent detention as an unlawful arrival despite being granted a visa to participate in the Australian Open, had the hallmarks of oppression and incompetent vulgarity... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Voices Of Concern: Aussies For Assange’s Return

With Julian Assange now fighting the next stage of efforts to extradite him to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 of which are based on the brutal, archaic Espionage Act, some Australian politicians have found their voice. It might be said that a few have even found their conscience... More>>



Forbidden Parties: Boris Johnson’s Law On Illegal Covid Gatherings

It was meant to be time to reflect. The eager arms of a new pandemic were enfolding a society with asphyxiating, lethal effect. Public health authorities advocated various measures: social distancing, limited contact between family and friends, limited mobility. No grand booze-ups. No large parties. No bonking, except within dispensations of intimacy and various “bubble” arrangements. Certainly, no orgies... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Question Time Is Anything But
The focus placed on the first couple of Question Time exchanges between the new leader of the National Party and the Prime Minister will have seemed excessive to many but the most seasoned Parliamentary observers. Most people, especially those outside the Wellington beltway, imagine Question Time is exactly what it sounds... More>>



Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>