Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Relationship Between White House And Maoists

Relationship Between White House And Maoists

By Mohan Nepali

"We respect each other's sovereignty. We will never interfere in each other's internal affairs. Both of us will work towards eliminating ideological prejudices. Individual freedom will never be ignored. Both of us will adhere to the principles set in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights."

When will we have an opportunity to read such a piece of declaration issued by the two opposing sides? The above is just a piece of imagination regarding the relationship between the White House and Nepal's Maoists. At present they have hostility towards each other. The White House does not even want to hear 'c' for communists and Maoists don't want to pronounce 'a' for America. This is the ideologically isolated world we have been living in.

On March 29, 2007 the US Ambassador to Nepal James F. Moriarty repated that it would be dangerous to take Maoists to power while they possess arms. He has said this over quite a number of times.

Some vital implications of the US view regarding Nepal's peace process should not be neglected.

The US Administration is the only one governent in the world that has listed Nepal's Maoists as terrorists till today. All other countries have recognized the ongoing peace process in Nepal. They have never said that Nepal's Maoists need to be qualified by any nation to participate in the management of their nation. But the US Administration and Nepal's monarchy are the only two sides that have never accepted the existence of Maoists. Contrary to this, Nepal's Seven Party Allinace (SPA) have made Maoists an equal partner to end autocratic monarchy and commence the restructuring of the Nepali society. Why should the US Administration be ideologically so prejudiced?

Nepal's Maoists are under the UN monitoring. Although they have been accused of hiding more weapons, such weapons are automatically illegal because of thier peace accord wtih the government. The US government has repeated its stance against any possible involvement of Maoists in the government. This is not according to the peace aspirations of the Nepali people who gave their street verdict for republic. But the monarchy is indirectly defying this verdict and trying to get US role in preserving feudalism. So many things will be unfolded in the future. Take care Mr. White House.


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>

The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>