Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Iraq - Murder Land For Journalists?

Iraq - Murder Land For Journalists?

01 July 2007
Mohan Nepali, Kathmandu:

With the murder of Sahar al-Haideri and Zeena Zakir Mahmoud, two Iraqi women journalists, the number of slaughtered journalists so far in Iraq has reached 108. As a single journalist can represent millions of people, the murder of 106 journalists is similar to the murder of millions of people. Thus, Iraq has become a murder land instead of motherland for Iraqis themselves. It has become a slaughter house for journalists as well. This prevailing situation in the country raises a serious question about whether the Iraqi fighters under different stickers have a genuine intention of liberating their country from foreign occupation. They may give a logic that they are doing well by killing thousands of people who support foreign occupation. But generally ordinary citizens never support foreign occupation. Just because they could not join armed groups for their own causes does not mean they are traitors. Ironically, ordinary people have become the principal target of their attacks.

What is vitally worth considering in this context is the fact that the Iraqi fighters have been knowingly or unknowingly making their own occupiers stronger by indulging in the blind path of finishing one another off. No other people than the occupiers themselves can be happier with this situation. Especially American occupiers are to blame in the main because they have brought al-Quaeda to Iraq and fertilized the soil for them.

A genuine ideology of liberation unites people against occupation. Those fighting without a liberation ideology are more likely to end up with criminal activities that are not only dangerous to society as a whole but also highly self-destructive. The ongoing violence in Iraq appears oriented to the further destruction of Iraq. People are the greatest sources of power and wisdom. Should thousands of valuable people be misled like this, several generations of Iraq will have to live under occupation. It is the people who have to brainstorm and find a better way to their liberation. But the hot realities of the country have created so many psychological barriers even to communication of what is good and what is bad for them. Lack of listening culture will not but keep the Iraqis aloof from one another.

Millions of people in the world oppose the foreign occupation of Iraq. Independent and sovereign nations must not support any aggression or occupation. Even if slave-minded governments of many countries extend their support to the occupiers, their own peoples are against it. While the majority of people are against the violation of other nations’ sovereignty, have the Iraqi fighters sought support from such justice-loving people?

Justice-loving people cannot support a movement without considering its nature and practical consequences. Of paramount importance would be the nature of the Iraqi movement against occupation. If they base their political movement on a genuine liberation ideology and win the hearts and minds of millions of justice-loving peoples within and outside their country, their influence will definitely grow. But if killing unarmed civilians with heavy machine guns is misunderstood as unique bravery, it will lead the fighters snowhere.

As far as the Iraqi fighters’ bravery is concerned, it should be admitted that they have not made any substantial impact on the occupiers who have now got a pretext to penetrate deeper into Iraq. They say they cannot leave Iraq in chaos. In fact, they must quit Iraq immediately if they respect international treaties.

But guns are not enough to make them quit Iraq. An ideology is vital for the Iraqi fighters. Those equipped with an ideology have generally proved victorious in human history. Have the Iraqi fighters ever considered this? But religious fundamentalism must never be mistaken for an ideology. Religion is a matter of interpretation. The essence of any religion must be human wellbeing. Cruelties cannot be accepted as scientific prescriptions of religions.

Killing fellow citizens by purchasing the occupiers’ weapons is extremely ironical. As long as the Iraqis remain utterly divided among hundreds of armed groups hunting one another, their vital agenda of liberation becomes overshadowed.

Journalists are precious public communicators in general. Killing them creates losses to society. Communication is the blood circulatory system of society. Trying to disrupt the social process by killing journalists is against the movement itself. As journalists’ vital duty is to inform people on current happenings, they must not be killed because of their coverage of sectarian violence. Journalists base their work on humanity. Informing society about the abduction of fellow human beings is natural. Just because of their informing role, killing them is not justifiable. Will the Iraqi armed men stop to think over this for five minutes?


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>

The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>