Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Lulling Americans Into False Sense of Security

Democrat’s New Spy Bill – Lulling Americans Into False Sense of Security

by William Lewis

The war on terror and the war on freedom are nonpartisan issues. Both Democrats and Republicans alike have consistently voted for legislation that, through the illusion of protecting our families and our homeland, have actually removed critical components of the U.S. Constitution. Will the Democrat’s new FISA Spy Bill be any different?

HR 3773, The FISA Amendments Act of 2008, recapitulates a series of executive checks, requiring the Executive Branch to apply to a secret court asking for a search warrant BEFORE conducting the necessary wiretap. This sounds perfectly reasonable at first glance. However, under an “Emergency Authorization” detailed in the bill, the White House is allowed to conduct warrant-less wiretaps within a seven-day window before seeking the approval from the FISA court. In other words, if the President believes that an emergency exists, he then has the authority, under the new law, to conduct surveillance on literally anyone and he doesn’t need a search warrant or probable cause to legally issue the orders.

Quoting noted constitutional attorney Jonathan Turley from the new docu-patriotic film, “Washington, You’re Fired,” he states, “The Constitution says that you need probable cause for a crime, and yet they routinely ignore it. Why? Because they want to.”

Along with 196 other votes against the bill, Rep. Ron Paul weighed in on HR 3773 by saying, “This bill will allow the federal government to engage in the bulk collection of American citizens’ communications. In effect, it means that any American may have his electronic communications monitored without a search warrant. As such, the bill clearly violates the Fourth Amendment.” Rep. Paul went on to point out that of the 50,000 National Security Letters issued around 30,000 were issued, NOT for suspected terrorists, but for Americans. He later added, “When we come to accept that the government can spy on us without a court order, we have come to accept tyranny.” [1]

These policies of spying go way beyond simply blanket data-mining every American. The current administration has shown a certain autocratic willingness to serve as judge, jury, and executioner and now with HR 3773 the President will have his seven day window to violate the one fundamental principal that binds, unites, and defines all Americans, everywhere – the right to privacy.

The President himself admitted to the existence of the NSA’s illegal wiretap program set into motion on his direct orders. This stunning admission coupled with whistleblower testimony from Mark Klein, dates these data-mining and eavesdropping programs back to mid-2000, well before any terrorist threat and well before the Bush Administration’s stated need to blanket data-mine every American citizen… Yet, they did it. Verizon and AT&T along with a handful of other telecommunications corporations, willfully violated U.S. laws at the request of the White House by data-mining the daily communications of millions of Americans.

We would eventually learn from a Defense Department document obtained by NBC News, that the Bush Administration was targeting and closely watching Quakers, peace activists, and anyone who disagreed with his key policies. This also corroborates a New York Times report released in December 2005, which states that President Bush had authorized domestic spying and had bypassed the Secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Will HR 3773 really fix FISA and protect American’s right to privacy? Don’t be lulled into a false sense of security by legislation that promises to fix OTHER pieces of broken legislation. FISA and a growing number of other spy bills CANNOT be fixed because they are fundamentally flawed with the notion that we must relinquish freedom in order to protect freedom.

We need to begin anew. The only way to do that is to completely remove laws from the books that violate our U.S. Constitution. Those laws being The Military Commissions Act, which ended Habeas Corpus; The John Warner Defense Act, which ended Posse Comitatus; The Detainee Treatment Act, which protects torture; The Real ID Act rider attached to HR 1268, which will give us a national ID card; and a half dozen others…

Our freedoms and liberties are not derived and assigned by men or by governments. They are yours by the very birthright of being born. Our founding documents refer to these rights as being “unalienable.” Put simply, this means that your rights cannot be transferred or removed – not by a man, not by a president, and not by a law.

“If we permit our constitutional rights to be watered down out of fear, we have given up our democracy. Congress must stand firm and defend the Constitution.” -- Dennis Kucinich [2]

The only question is, “Will they?”


1 Revolution Radio - Statement on H.R. 3773 FISA Amendments Act of 2008

2 Kucinich Opposes FISA Bill That Infringes on Fourth Amendment Rights


By: William Lewis, Writer /

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Philip Temple: Hang On A Minute, Mate
Peter Dunne quietly omits some salient facts when arguing for retention of MMP’s coat-tailing provision that allows a party to add list seats if it wins one electorate and achieves more than 1% or so of the party vote... More>>

Cheap Grace And Climate Change: Australia And COP26

It was not for everybody, but the shock advertising tactics of the Australian comedian Dan Ilic made an appropriate point. Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison, a famed coal hugger, has vacillated about whether to even go to the climate conference in Glasgow. Having himself turned the country’s prime ministerial office into an extended advertising agency, Ilic was speaking his language... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Funeral Rites For COVID Zero
It was such a noble public health dream, even if rather hazy to begin with. Run down SARS-CoV-2. Suppress it. Crush it. Or just “flatten the curve”, which could have meant versions of all the above. This created a climate of numerical sensitivity: a few case infections here, a few cases there, would warrant immediate, sharp lockdowns, stay-at-home orders, the closure of all non-vital service outlets... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Labour's High Water Mark
If I were still a member of the Labour Party I would be feeling a little concerned after this week’s Colmar Brunton public opinion poll. Not because the poll suggested Labour is going to lose office any time soon – it did not – nor because it showed other parties doing better – they are not... More>>

Our Man In Washington: Morrison’s Tour Of Deception

It was startling and even shocking. Away from the thrust and cut of domestic politics, not to mention noisy discord within his government’s ranks, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison could breathe a sign of relief. Perhaps no one would notice in Washington that Australia remains prehistoric in approaching climate change relative to its counterparts... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Melbourne Quake: Shaken, Not Stirred

It began just after a news interview. Time: a quarter past nine. Morning of September 22, and yet to take a sip from the brewed Turkish coffee, its light thin surface foam inviting. The Australian city of Melbourne in its sixth lockdown, its residents fatigued and ravaged by regulations. Rising COVID-19 numbers, seemingly inexorable... More>>