Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Controversy over National tax cuts: clarification

Controversy over National's tax cuts: a clarification

by Keith Rankin, 12 December 2008

In my Scoop article Controversy over National's tax cuts (http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0812/S00214.htm) I inadvertently suggested that the fiscal cost of extending the Independent Earner Tax Credit (IETC) in 2011 into the $14,000 to $24,000 income bracket would be only $5 million.

The correct estimate is $100 million. If the IETC is incorporated into the independent earner tax scale that I suggested, there will be about 250,000 persons affected. On average they would be about $400 per year better off. Multiplying these two numbers gives $100 million.

In Parliament on Wednesday, Michael Cullen suggested (and Bill English conceded in National admits tax package costs Kiwi workers) that it would cost $730 million to ensure that nobody was worse off in 2011 under National's Tax Cuts than they would have been under Labour's tax cuts. Only $100 million of that $730 million relates to persons defined as 'independent' who will earn less than $24,000. The remaining $630 million relates to persons not defined as independent and who will earn less than $50,000 in 2011.

There are ethical and semantic problems in trying to separate 'independent' persons from 'dependent' persons. However these problems are not nearly as great as the problems faced by the previous government in deciding who was 'in work' and who was 'not in work'.

Currently, as a result of Labour's Working for Families programme, people working 29 hours per week who live with a non-employed partner are defined as 'not in work'. People not employed at all but supported by a partner working 30 hours per week are defined as 'in work', but not if the supporting partner is providing that support via the Child Support scheme.

Ideal solutions will avoid separating citizens into distinct sub-categories of citizen (such as 'in-work' versus 'not in-work'; 'independent' or 'dependent'). In the meantime, National can easily and affordably correct its egregious error in denying an Independent Earner Tax Credit to independent earners who earn less than $24,000 per year.

********

krankin @ unitec.ac.nz

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Fatuous Defence: Australia’s Guided Missile Plans

Even in times of pandemic crises, some things never change. While Australia gurgles and bumbles slowly with its COVID-19 vaccine rollout, there are other priorities at stake. Threat inflators are receiving much interest in defence, and the media ... More>>

Richard S. Ehrlich: Cambodia's Hun Sen Feels Politically Vaccinated

BANGKOK, Thailand -- When Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen received his AstraZeneca vaccination shot, he suddenly felt invulnerable and vowed to rule indefinitely. Hun Sen is already one of the world's longest ruling prime ministers, confident his successor ... More>>

Reese Erlich: Foreign Correspondent: My Final Column?

I’m dying. It’s not easy to write these words. But it’s true. More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Brawling Over Vaccines: Export Bans And The EU’s Bungled Rollout
The European Union has been keeping up appearances in encouraging the equitable distribution of vaccines to combat SARS-CoV-2 and its disease, COVID-19. Numerous statements speak to the need to back the COVAX scheme, to ensure equity and that no one state misses out... More>>

Jennifer S. Hunt: Trump Evades Conviction Again As Republicans Opt For Self-Preservation

By Jennifer S. Hunt Lecturer in Security Studies, Australian National University Twice-impeached former US President Donald Trump has evaded conviction once more. On the fourth day of the impeachment trial, the Senate verdict is in . Voting guilty: ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Let The Investigation Begin: The International Criminal Court, Israel And The Palestinian Territories

International tribunals tend to be praised, in principle, by those they avoid investigating. Once interest shifts to those parties, such bodies become the subject of accusations: bias, politicisation, crude arbitrariness. The United States, whose legal and political ... More>>