Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

The politics of empathy: Cameron and Ivan’s Death

The politics of empathy: David Cameron and Ivan’s Death


by Binoy Kampmark

Politics, and modern politics at that, has as much to do with forged empathy (occasionally sympathy) as with anything else. Candidates lagging in the polls often dig around for which malady to feign, or what sentimental moment can be used to inspire a popular reaction. Cold, machine politics, suddenly becomes warm, basking in the sunlight of empathy. The leader ceases to become political automaton, transforming into the flesh and blood representative of the people.

The deployment of empathy and its oft related twin sympathy in political circles stands to reason, even if it often muddles it. Where ideas matter little, marred by tabloid effects and the twittered sound byte, the sentimental cast assumes relevance. Leaders may instil unjustified fears and stir the pot of prejudice; they may well do, as Abraham Lincoln urged, appeal to the better side of the human self. The British opposition leader and prime ministerial contender David Cameron should never be seen to have wished the sad end to his afflicted son. Six-year old Ivan had been suffering from the crippling effects of cerebral palsy and epilepsy. But his death on Wednesday cast a certain glow on the father aspirant, a feature that was unintended but not, at least for the public relations jackals, unwelcome.

The personal story does, of course, bathe the candidate in a certain holy water, a rinsing that often does away with imperfections and problems. The cynic might argue that death, preferably of the aspirant or the office holder (vide John F. Kennedy and Robert Kennedy), perfects the candidate, effacing bad memories and character records. The death of a personality can also be manipulated with spectacular political results – witness the role of Prime Minister Tony Blair and the delegation of Princess Diana, killed in a car accident in France, as the ‘People’s Princess’. She had, of course, been nothing of the sort, struggling for much of her life to even be her own Princess.

In a more recent example, Barack Obama treated the death of his grandmother during the US presidential race with ceremonial grace while playing to the stands. Obama, as with other American presidents of that same vein, touched, if every so gently, that personal nerve that makes the electorate take notice. A luckless John McCain could only watch. But other factors fed this political phenomenon, not least of all the man who made Obama more appealing in the first place: George W. Bush.

Cameron, in opening his private life to scrutiny after becoming leader of the Conservative Party, was treading that same path. A documentary for the BBC was made filming the entire family’s children, and featured Ivan prominently. Ivan became the softening touch – another twist in the tortured journey of that fiction called ‘compassionate conservatism’. Cameron, it was promised, would change the face of British Tory politics.

What is curious about Ivan’s death was the impact it had across the benches and the political landscape. Not in fifteen years had the House of Commons cancelled prime minister’s questions, a session otherwise considered a sacred cow in the bruising sessions of parliamentary politics. It became a national event, with covering leads in major papers and news outlets.

Ivan became, as John F. Burns of the New York Times suggested, a ‘prism’ through which the personal lives of David and his wife Samantha were evaluated. For Burns and other commentators, Ivan’s death had somehow jettisoned the image of the establishment ‘toff’, though how that did so was by no means clear. Presumably toffs are somehow humanised by the deaths of their young sons which, in England, is not the easiest case to make out. What of Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who has a child suffering from cystic fibrosis? That is hardly likely to make him more human and less the dour economic manager. But then again, Brown was never a toff.

Cameron’s glow may, in the end, dim and he will be left, along with his family, with the justified grief in losing a child. The fires of politics burn differently, and at different levels over time. Much of that heat favours Cameron, at least for the moment, but it will have to last at least into 2010. More factors, including a stumbling, bumbling government now battling economic turmoil, will be needed to see him to victory. Whether Cameron continues to draw various precedents from the cupboard of empathy, surprises may well be in store for him. He still, in so many ways, reflects an upbringing, less of a deep, instrumental politician governed by instinct, than as a public relations man who cut his teeth in a government run by that least empathetic of all politicians: Margaret Thatcher.

*************

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, University of Cambridge. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Globetrotter: The Geopolitics Behind Spiraling Gas And Electricity Prices In Europe
The current crisis of spiraling gas prices in Europe, coupled with a cold snap in the region, highlights the fact that the transition to green energy in any part of the world is not going to be easy. The high gas prices in Europe also bring to the forefront the complexity involved in transitioning to clean energy sources... More>>

Julian Assange: A Thousand Days In Belmarsh
Julian Assange has now been in the maximum-security facilities of Belmarsh prison for over 1,000 days. On the occasion of his 1,000th day of imprisonment, campaigners, supporters and kindred spirits gathered to show their support, indignation and solidarity at this political detention most foul... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Mauling Of Novak Djokovic
Rarely can the treatment of a grand sporting figure by officialdom have caused such consternation. Novak Djokovic, the tennis World Number One, has always had a tendency to get under skin and constitution, creating a large following of admirers and detractors. But his current treatment by Australian authorities, and his subsequent detention as an unlawful arrival despite being granted a visa to participate in the Australian Open, had the hallmarks of oppression and incompetent vulgarity... More>>


Off To The Supreme Court: Assange’s Appeal Continues

With December’s High Court decision to overturn the lower court ruling against the extradition of Julian Assange to the United States, lawyers of the WikiLeaks founder immediately got busy... More>>


Forbidden Parties: Boris Johnson’s Law On Illegal Covid Gatherings

It was meant to be time to reflect. The eager arms of a new pandemic were enfolding a society with asphyxiating, lethal effect. Public health authorities advocated various measures: social distancing, limited contact between family and friends, limited mobility. No grand booze-ups. No large parties. No bonking, except within dispensations of intimacy and various “bubble” arrangements. Certainly, no orgies... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Question Time Is Anything But
The focus placed on the first couple of Question Time exchanges between the new leader of the National Party and the Prime Minister will have seemed excessive to many but the most seasoned Parliamentary observers. Most people, especially those outside the Wellington beltway, imagine Question Time is exactly what it sounds... More>>