Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More
Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Quick guide to the new copyright bill

Quick guide to the new copyright bill

From Tech Liberty NZ - Defending civil liberties in the digital age

The Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Bill is a replacement for the abandoned section 92A of the Copyright Act. It provides provisions for media companies to accuse people of infringing copyright, and for those people to be fined by the Copyright Tribunal. It also includes the penalty of disconnecting their internet - but this provision will initially be suspended.

The Bill went through one round of submissions (see ours) but the second reading was done under parliamentary urgency on the 13th of April and it is expected to be passed, still under urgency, on the 14th of April.

Update: the bill has passed its third reading.


The Bill has some improvements over section 92A:

• It has replaced the overly wide definition of ISP (Internet Service Provider) with the idea of an IPAP (Internet Protocol Address Provider).

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

• The person accused of infringing copyright now has a chance to defend themselves against the accusations.

• It doesn't make ISPs responsible for making decisions about disconnection - they just have to pass messages between the accuser and the accused.

• It better respects the privacy of account holders.

Major problems

But overall it still has some major problems:

• It makes the person whose name is on the internet account liable for all actions done by any user of that connection. Flatmates will be responsible for the people they live with, businesses will be responsible for their staff, parents will be responsible for their kids. Sharing your internet connection will put you at legal risk.

• It includes the idea that the Copyright Tribunal should believe the accusation from the media companies unless the account holder can prove it to be wrong. This is even when these accusations have been proven time and time again to often be substantially inaccurate. There are no penalties for making false accusations.

• It still includes internet disconnection as a penalty. Initially this provision will be suspended but it can be reactivated at the whim of the government. We oppose disconnection.

Political support

National and Labour are both voting in favour of the Bill.

The Greens are voting against it.

Tech Liberty articles about the bill

Roundup of initial reactions to the bill

Why we shouldn't accept the media companies accusations as true

What is an IPAP and what are the differences between IPAPs and account holders?

Revised section 122MA is no comfort

Guest post - letter to Simon Power re copyright

Our submission to the Select Committee.

Flowcharts explaining some of the processes in the bill

Other articles of note

• David Farrar does an excellent summary of the process.

• The Creative Freedom Foundation's original s92A Blackout campaign.


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
Top Scoops Headlines


Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.