Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Whirlpool of Crazy: A Letter to European Friends

Whirlpool of Crazy: A Letter to European Friends

By Bernard Weiner
July 26, 2011

Dear Wolfgang and Jacqueline:

Always nice to hear from you and to get your queries about politics in the U.S. of A.

To make it easier, I'll copy-and-paste your five inquiries in italics, with my responses below that. My answers will be in the way of informed speculations, since many of us progressive Americans can't believe what we're seeing either. It's like we're caught in a Republican-created whirlpool of crazy: spinning around and around with no way the raging flow can be turned off in time to save the country -- or our battered minds.

Here we go:


So what the f--- is going on? American politics is always a bit weird, but these days it seems even more bi-polar and demented. It's more like a mad video game, points being given for especially ruthless, ignorant, and violent denunciations directed at your perceived opponents. No wonder so many of your citizens stay home on election day. What's the American saying?: "Why should I vote? It only encourages them.")

Indeed, the extreme right-wing of the GOP is dedicated to its Manichean, no-compromise ideology, one that could push the country's economy and social structures off a cliff. These HardRightists have gone so far the off the reasonable radar that more and more traditional, stalwart conservatives are coming to realize the likely electoral consequences in 2012: a second term for Obama, and a broken GOP and an intra-party civil war.

Among that growing Republican cohort worried about the ramifications of the party's intransigent positions: conservative NYTimes columnist David Brooks, Governor Hayley Barbour of Mississippi, conservative Senator Lindsay Graham of South Carolina, mostly conservative Senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, even HardRight leader Karl Rove, et al. (Rove agrees with the positions taken by the extremist GOP leaders but more important than that, he wants to return the Republicans to power in the White House in 2012 and behaving like tantrum-prone children, he suggests, ain't gonna make it).


We don't understand why the Republicans are risking your country's vaunted credit-rating. Do they really not understand the horrific ramifications of what they're doing, how their approach could lead to a worldwide Great Depression?

Of course they understand it. They (and their corporate masters) simply don't care. Their more important -- and only -- goal is to defeat Obama in 2012. Therefore, he must be denied any possible victory. If Obama were to introduce a bill saying that the sun rises in the east and sets in the West, the extremist GOP would work to defeat it, claiming it's a liberal plot to propagandize the citizenry and that Obama is the "SocialistNaziMuslimStalinistAnti-Christ."

In some ways, the Tea Partiers/extremist-Republicans seem to be afflicted with a kind of Tourette's Syndrome. When they hear the word "Obama" they begin twitching and jerking and saying dirty things. If they were to see him coming down the street carrying a legislative idea they originated, they would immediately disown their proposal, make a 180-degree turn and begin flinging clods of mud at him over their shoulders.

You're right: Anything can be said in the U.S. these days by noted public figures, no matter how crazy. Nearly 80 young Labour Party campers get slaughtered by a rightwing fanatic in Norway, and American rightwing pundit Glenn Beck compares those kids to "Hitler Youth," suggesting they got what they deserved since they were liberals.

No doubt much of this nonsensical, rabble-rousing behavior will subside in America at some point -- perhaps if the Republicans are badly defeated in the 2012 election -- but, as you well know, every country in times of great stress seems to go through periods of mass derangement, and afterwards reasonable leaders re-emerge and socially responsible democracy takes root once again. Right now, America is going through its loony, anti-democratic phase. In all likelihood, you Europeans will have to deal with your own outbursts of crazy in the near-future -- the anti-foreigner, anti-Muslim Norway tragedy may be just the tip of the iceberg: politicians and parties who agree with those sentiments are being elected to various countries' legislatures across Europe, from England to France to Denmark and beyond.


Does Obama really have to worry about being re-elected? The Republican candidates we see on TV over here look like little more than a bunch of uneducated, pandering clowns.

Obama is still popular in America, but his numbers are going down a bit as the economy remains stuck in the jobless doldrums and he's doing little or nothing to help create jobs. I don't think Obama ordinarily would have much to fear from any of those "clowns," as you call them. After all, only about one third of the U.S. population -- many from the fundamentalist, anti-science, anti-reality world -- share their extremist views. But Obama has thoroughly pissed off a good share of his own Democratic base by behaving more like a Republican than the centrist pragmatist he pretends to be.

Like Clinton before him, Obama, unwilling to fight for traditional Democratic principles, seems so hungry for any little reform he can call a "victory" that he compromises before any battle has been joined, or else offers some GOP-friendly compromise for free without using it for political leverage in negotiations. Necessarily, then, he constantly gets rolled by the Republicans, and then is hammered by liberals and progressives for his timidity and naivete. That base worked so hard and gave so much money to get Obama elected in 2008 only to see the policies of Cheney and Bush show up again in the White House (unwinnable imperialist wars abroad, civil liberties ignored, corporations favored over the middle class, jobs-creation forgotten, etc. etc.). He seems to suggest that he only backs down because of political pressures, but he's the one who initiates and pushes for the so-called "compromises."

It would seem that Obama's 2012 election stragegy rests on winning over moderate Republicans (those appalled by what their party has turned into) and independents in the middle. He knows he'll never win that third of the population dedicated to Republican Know-Nothingism, and he's willing to continue antagonizing his liberal base because he figures: 1) doing so gives him more only-adult-in-the-room street cred; and 2) because enough of his disgruntled base eventually will hold their nose and vote for him because the Republican candidate will be so off-puttingly awful that they'll have little choice. Of course, this strategy could be thrown off if the economy gets worse (which, as the GOP certainly realizes, it certainly would do if the debt-ceiling is not lifted), or if, say, Senator Bernie Sanders or someone else decides to challenge Obama for the Democratic nomination from the left.


The Right-created Great Recession has led to huge budget problems not only for you Americans, but also for those of us across the globe and for the policies of "austerity" being forced upon us because of those shrunken budgets. Those "austerity" policies come down hardest on the middle-class and poor and so there have been massive demonstrations against those policies -- and the wealthy and corporations who benefit -- all over Europe, most graphically in Greece, Spain, France and so on. Those same shock-doctrine "austerity" policies are being implemented in the various states in America, but we don't see massive protests against them. What's happening? Is there no real Left anymore in America? Do those being hurt by these policies just not care?

I share your sense of puzzlement. But I can offer a few speculations.

I think part of that seeming calm here is that Americans have been led to believe that we are not a class-based society. In short, if you're not doing well right now, that can change and you can become a millionaire someday. So the "system" is permitted to remain in place without major reforms. If you point out the fact that the middle-class has not moved up economically since the 1970s, and that the wealthy have only grown geometrically more wealthy and less interested in helping those below them, you are lambasted as preaching "class warfare," which is held to be a bad thing. (You're not supposed to notice that protecting the status quo is "class warfare" against the great majority of Americans.)

Your instinct is correct: There is not a viable, united, effective Left in the United States these days. The culture over the past few decades has been shifted ever rightward. Indeed, what used to be the Right is now the Center. Thanks to incitement by right-wing commentators and media outlets, it's risky to be a liberal -- or, God forbid! -- a progressive in many places in the U.S.

But there are some signs that the tectonic political plates may be shifting. What has led to this potential shift are the reckless, extremist policies of far-right Republicans. The 2010 election brought those types into power in so many states (and, of course, into the majority in the House of Representatives in D.C.), and the extremist governors and legislators decided to push the envelope way beyond the traditional political parameters. They are going after unions, workers (including firefighters, nurses, teachers, police), they openly are attacking the gains from the New Deal and Great Society (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid), even the government itself, cutting off all sorts of social services and benefits.

If the Republicans had continued to do this in increments over the years on the low-down, probably nobody would have been too riled up. But the extreme conservatives are so greedy for money and power, they felt this was their best chance in generations to go for it all, in the open. And this has led to a significant liberal backlash as ordinary citizens, openly attacked by the GOP, decided to fight back to protect their unions, their jobs, their rights -- in Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan and so on. Whether this fledgling movement will coalesce into an active, effective national Left is not clear, but at least the building blocks are there.


Who are the most popular, dangerous rightwing fear&hate-mongers in the U.S. today? Are their ranks growing or shrinking?

Three who are certifiable: Pamela Geller, MIchael Savage, and Glenn Beck -- unadulterated, frothing loons. Next tier: Rush Limbaugh, almost anyone on Fox "News," Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, et al.

Those are among the most obvious candidates -- easy targets for satire and criticism. The more dangerous are those in the Republican mainstream who enable these demagogues by encouraging them and often offering endorsements of their bigoted, hate-filled screeds, folks like Newt Gingrich, Pat Buchanan, Senator James Inhofe, Speaker John Boehner, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Governor Jan Brewer, Sharron Angle, Rep. Paul Ryan, Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, et al. They create the stew of "respectable" cultural parameters; the extremist wackos add the explosive spices.

As for popularity, these politicians and pundits become the media darlings of the right, and then, inevitably, they start to lose their luster and a new goofy hero appears to be fauned over. Glenn Beck is a good example: amazingly popular with the Know-Nothing crowd, and then he got wackier and wackier, and his star dimmed. Let it be so for the rest of them.

Hope all is well with you two and the kids. I miss hanging out with you all. Maybe next year. Thanks again for writing.

Warmly, Bernie


Bernard Weiner, Ph.D. in government & international relations, has taught at various universities, worked as a writer/editor for the San Francisco Chronicle for two decades, and currently serves as co-editor of The Crisis Papers (

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Binoy Kampmark: Budget Cockups In The Time Of Coronavirus: Reporting Errors And Australia’s JobKeeper Scheme

Hell has, in its raging fires, ringside seats for those who like their spreadsheets. The seating, already peopled by those from human resources, white collar criminals and accountants, becomes toastier for those who make errors with those spreadsheets. ... More>>

The Dig - COVID-19: Just Recovery

The COVID-19 crisis is compelling us to kick-start investment in a regenerative and zero-carbon future. We were bold enough to act quickly to stop the virus - can we now chart a course for a just recovery? More>>

The Conversation: Are New Zealand's New COVID-19 Laws And Powers Really A Step Towards A Police State?

Reaction to the New Zealand government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdown has ranged from high praise to criticism that its actions were illegal and its management chaotic. More>>

Keith Rankin: Universal Versus Targeted Assistance, A Muddled Dichotomy

The Commentariat There is a regular commentariat who appear on places such as 'The Panel' on Radio New Zealand (4pm on weekdays), and on panels on television shows such as Newshub Nation (TV3, weekends) and Q+A (TV1, Mondays). Generally, these panellists ... More>>

Jelena Gligorijevic: (Un)lawful Lockdown And Government Accountability

As the Government begins to ease the lockdown, serious questions remain about the lawfulness of these extraordinary measures. Parliament’s Epidemic Response Committee has indicated it will issue summonses for the production of legal advice about the ... More>>

Caitlin Johnstone: Do You Consent To The New Cold War?

The world's worst Putin puppet is escalating tensions with Russia even further, with the Trump administration looking at withdrawal from more nuclear treaties in the near future. In addition to planning on withdrawing from the Open Skies Treaty ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Why Thinking Makes It So: Donald Trump’s Obamagate Fixation

The “gate” suffix has been wearing thin since the break-in scandal that gave it its birth. Since Watergate, virtually anything dubious and suggestive, and much more besides, is suffixed. Which brings us to the issue of President Donald Trump’s ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Ethics (and Some Of The Economics) Of Lifting The Lockdown

As New Zealand passes the half-way mark towards moving out of Level Four lockdown, the trade-offs involved in life-after-lockdown are starting to come into view. All very well for National’s finance spokesperson Paul Goldsmith to claim that “The number one priority we have is to get out of the lockdown as soon as we can”…Yet as PM Jacinda Ardern pointed out a few days ago, any crude trade-off between public health and economic well-being would be a false choice... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Brutal Choices: Anders Tegnell And Sweden’s Herd Immunity Goal

If the title of epidemiological czar were to be created, its first occupant would have to be Sweden’s Anders Tegnell. He has held sway in the face of sceptics and concern that his “herd immunity” approach to COVID-19 is a dangerous, and breathtakingly ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Trans-Tasman Bubble, And The Future Of Airlines

As the epidemiologists keep on saying, a trans-Tasman bubble will require having in place beforehand a robust form of contact tracing, of tourists and locals alike - aided by some kind of phone app along the lines of Singapore’s TraceTogether ... More>>


  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog