Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Book Review: This Does Not Change Everything

Book Review: This Does Not Change Everything

by Catherine Austin Fitts
October 19, 2014

To say that Naomi Klein’s new book This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. Climate Change is disappointing is an understatement.

Klein’s best seller Shock Doctrine was a tour de force. For several years after its publication, it was a pleasure to see Naomi Klein fearlessly debating Alan Greenspan and putting him neatly in his place.

I am still waiting for the book on climate change that deals with reality, makes sense of the issues and frames the uncertainty for busy people with little or no scientific background.

For such a book to do so it would need to:
• Provide an overview of climate trends based on hard statistics from redundant sources;
• Explain trends in geophysical dynamics such as the deterioration in the magnetic fields:
• Provide an overview of space weather and explain trends related to current climate behavior;
• Address the relationship between the global spraying program that has been ongoing since the mid-1990’s and what has been happening with our climate – HAARP too;
• Address serious allegations regarding weather manipulation and weather warfare and how they relate to symptoms attributed to climate change;
• Frame the scientific debate between those who believe that climate trends are a function of man made behavior, including fossil fuel use, or trends related to space weather and geophysical conditions;
• Stop confusing the current central banking warfare model with capitalism and markets. There is a difference between organized crime and managed/manipulated economics and market economics. A coherent picture of the real economics we are dealing’ with is important to understand, as markets are potentially a very important part of real solutions; and
• Understand the relationship between fossil fuels and the current dollar reserve currency status. As Chris Powell once said, “fiat currency has done far more environmental damage, then all the mining companies have ever dreamt of doing.” This discussion would include an understanding of Jim Norman’s “Oil Card” and the national security management of global oil prices as an essential component of our current system.

In addition it would have to address the two most important issues to consider when addressing our climate and environmental issues.

First, we need to question why and how we have come to be dependent on fossil fuels which are managed on a centralized basis. Currently, 87% of our global energy use is provided by fossil fuels. Why? Numerous inventors from Tesla onwards have put forward inventions that would allow us to shift away from fossil fuels. We have a clear history of suppression of a robust selection of breakthrough energy technology. This history needs to be reviewed and addressed, as does the relative efficiencies of renewable energy alternatives available for a new robust energy model.

Second, we need to define the real problem. If climate change is happening and if it is a result of the use of fossil fuel, then it is not a primary problem. Rather it is a symptom of a problem, the real problem being our governance system.

We have a governance system that has systematically engaged in – at a minimum – significant and unnecessary environmental stress and – at a maximum- is ensuring that life on earth is unsuitable for most of the population.

So our real problem is not climate change, it is our governance system. Klein never addresses who and what constitutes our governance system. I presume it is because she, like the rest of us, does not know.

Why are we living on a planet where we are not allowed to understand who runs things and by what process? Why is resource allocation on Planet Earth a complete mystery?

Consequently, if we don’t know who is governing the key policy decisions on Planet Earth, it is fair to say that we do not have access to their intelligence and perspective on risk management of population and geophysical health.

How do you build alignment with people when you do not know who they are and you do not know what they are afraid of and what their goals are? No wonder life these days feels like playing bumper cars in the dark.

What we do know is that our leadership has been pouring infrastructure investment into underground facilities, the head of NASA is insisting we expand our space investment so that we not bet the ranch on one planet while governments appear to be using digital technology to implement police states. WHY? What is everyone so afraid of and why can we not talk about it?

Let me tell you what the most dangerous policy action in the world is. It is to decide that a phenomenon such as climate change is our #1 problem, that we need urgent action on it before understanding who is going to control the policy discussion and implement the solutions. Build a consensus that man made climate change is our #1 problem, and I assure you that our mystery governance system will use it to achieve a global taxation system and more centralized control.

Bottom line – Klein’s new book is a 466 page material omission. It is a breathless journey through many of the things that are wrong on Planet Earth. It wraps up those wrongs and enjoys a wild leap into explaining everything under one enveloping rubric of climate change on the assumption that we all know that climate change is real and a result of man-made factors. Finally, it draws on numerous heartstrings to ensure these folks are good, these other folks are bad, and that action is urgent. There is no more time to ascertain the facts.

Within Klein’s meanderings, there are some good nuggets:
• She tears apart cap and trade and various other schemes that simply put money and power in the wrong hands. Bravo!;
• She illuminates numerous stories that out more than a few dirty players. Bravo!;
• She does a good job of defining the issues of extractive economics vs. regenerative economics. Actually, I wish she had written the book about regenerative economics as that is where we all need to go – no matter what the truth is about climate change. Clearly the call for new economic and investment models that align living and financial wealth on Planet Earth is urgent;
• She underscores the need for decentralized, grassroots action and points to numerous inspiring examples, including the efforts in Germany to take action locally on decentralized renewable energy solutions;
• She underscores the importance of decentralizing energy production and with it decentralizing economic and political power;
• She describes the power of shifting our investments behind decentralized solutions; and
• She describes the importance of not giving up hope and the power of continuing to take action.
So, there is lots of good stuff – enough to remind us why we are all Klein fans. However, the good stuff is wrapped in an emotional enchilada that fails to address reality, let alone provide us with a framework to deal with the issues before us.

Naomi Klein has tried to define “problem-solution” within the official reality. It is fine to do so at cocktail parties. However, doing so in the world of serious policy debates simply creates a weapon that our secretive governance system -whoever they are -can use to institute – yet again – more central control.

That secretive central control is the problem – not climate change. Bring transparency to our governance system and watch breakthrough solutions start to emerge on hundreds of important issues – climate change among them.


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Binoy Kampmark: Foreseeable Risk: Omicron Makes Its Viral Debut
It has been written about more times than any care to remember. Pliny the Elder, that old cheek, told us that Africa always tended to bring forth something new: Semper aliquid novi Africam adferre. The suggestion was directed to hybrid animals, but in the weird pandemic wonderland that is COVID-19, all continents now find themselves bringing forth their types, making their contributions. It just so happens that it’s southern Africa’s turn... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Totalitarian Cyber-Creep: Mark Zuckerberg In The Metaverse

Never leave matters of maturity to the Peter Panners of Silicon Valley. At their most benign, they are easily dismissed as potty and keyboard mad. At their worst, their fantasies assume the noxious, demonic forms that reduce all users of their technology to units of information and flashes of data... More>>

Keith Rankin: 'Influenza' Pandemics In New Zealand's Past
On Tuesday (16 Nov) I was concerned to hear this story on RNZ's Checkpoint (National distances itself from ex-MP after video with discredited academic). My concern here is not particularly with the "discredited academic", although no academic should suffer this kind of casual public slur. (Should we go further and call Simon Thornley, the academic slurred, a 'trailing epidemiologist'? In contrast to the epithet 'leading epidemiologist', as applied to Rod Jackson in this story from Newshub.) Academics should parley through argument, not insult... More>>

Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>

Globetrotter: Why Julian Assange’s Inhumane Prosecution Imperils Justice For Us All

When I first saw Julian Assange in Belmarsh prison, in 2019, shortly after he had been dragged from his refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy, he said, “I think I am losing my mind.”
He was gaunt and emaciated, his eyes hollow and the thinness of his arms was emphasized by a yellow identifying cloth tied around his left arm... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Labour's High Water Mark
If I were still a member of the Labour Party I would be feeling a little concerned after this week’s Colmar Brunton public opinion poll. Not because the poll suggested Labour is going to lose office any time soon – it did not – nor because it showed other parties doing better – they are not... More>>