Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Global mode and the big wah

Global mode and the big wah

This is a blog post that has appeared on InternetNZ's website at: https://internetnz.nz/blog/global-mode-and-big-wah. If you would like to be removed from the list that receives blog posts, please email david@internetnz.net.nz.

By David Cormack

Last week Sky TV, Spark, MediaWorks and TVNZ announced they were threatening to take legal action against those companies who sell or promote technology to let people more easily access (and pay for) offshore TV and movie services.

Put simply, the four named companies all had a big wah about Global Mode because it's eating into their forecast profits.

Over the last few months we've been really praiseworthy of the efforts Sky and Spark have been making with online broadcasting (Round of Applause for Sky and Free Lightbox part of future TV watching) but this latest move has caused us to lift our eyebrows.

I'm not going to get into the ins-and-outs of legality or the technical aspects, I just want to talk about the things that I know a bit about: communications.

First off, the legal action was announced on Thursday afternoon. Traditionally if you wanted to release something that could possibly be construed as a negative you'd do so on a Friday evening when journalists were hitting deadline for the day and tomorrow's paper was set out. So kudos to them.

Oh except the Thursday they released their statement was the Thursday before Good Friday. One of only two days of any year that a newspaper isn't published. So I retract that kudos, because it's actually *more* cynical than a Friday afternoon info-dump.

Secondly TVNZ covered the story for its Saturday evening news bulletin (link to story). Good on them for having a crack at the story even though their head-office has skin in the game.

CEOs of Sky and Spark were asked to appear in the bulletin. Both chose not to. This despite the fact that we've heard on good authority that Sky is leading the charge on this issue. John Fellet and Simon Moutter decided to stay well-away from fronting the news item about it; leaving it to TVNZ CEO Kevin Kenrick to literally phone the interview in.

And finally, from a communications perspective, the messaging that Sky, Spark et al have been using has been interesting. They've been very quick to try and make this a Business to Business problem. You consumers don't have to worry, this is just us boring suits fighting it out in the board-room-playground. You guys can keep having it sweet.

This quote was from their statement: "This is not about taking action against consumers; this is a business to business issue and is about creating a fair playing field".

A lot is said in that sentence that may not be picked up on at first glance.

First off, as noted: business to business, not consumer; secondly the use of "fair playing field" is fascinating. "Fair" is probably the word that New Zealanders hold most dear. That's how we want to be viewed. As fair. No-one gets an advantage, we're all the same, pull yer head in mate etc.

So in their attempts to sell their sow's ear of a message they've attempted to tap into the NZ psyche and convince you that you should be on their side.

The big four know that if they can either a) convince you that it's not in the interests of consumers or b) convince you that it's about making things fair; then they'll win the hearts and minds of New Zealanders (or rather, not cede the hearts and minds to those who peddle global mode).

Except it does affect consumers. Because if Sky and Spark etc are successful then the consumer will have less choice than they currently do.

Like we said in our release on the issue last week, Kiwis still have the choice to go with Sky, Spark and others' online services, those companies should just focus on making their offering as attractive as possible. Not trying to shut down the competitors.

The only silver lining to this particular cloud is that, if the question ends up in court, we'll know what today's law says about this once and for all.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Binoy Kampmark: A Looting Matter: Cambodia’s Stolen Antiquities

Cambodia has often featured in the Western imagination as a place of plunder and pilfering. Temples and artefacts of exquisite beauty have exercised the interest of adventurers and buccaneers who looted with almost kleptocratic tendency. In 1924, the French novelist and future statesman André Malraux, proved himself one of Europe’s greatest adventurers in making off with a ton of sacred stones from Angkor Wat... More>>



Dunne Speaks: Labour Leadership Speculation Premature And Facile
Speculation that the Prime Minister’s leadership of the Labour Party may be at risk because of this week’s adverse poll results is as exaggerated as it is premature and facile. While her popularity has plummeted from the artificially stellar heights of a couple of years ago and is probably set to fall further to what would be a more realistic assessment... More>>




Ian Powell: Colossal ‘Porkies’ And Band-aids Don’t Make A Health Workforce Plan

On 1 August Minister of Health Andrew Little announced what he described as the start of a plan for the beleaguered workforce in Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system: Government’s 5 year late health workforce announcement. In October 2017, when Labour became government with its two coalition parties, it inherited a health workforce crisis from the previous National-led government... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: The Fuss About Monkeypox
The World Health Organization has been one of the easier bodies to abuse. For parochial types, populist moaners and critics of international institutions, the WHO bore the brunt of criticisms from Donald Trump to Jair Bolsonaro. Being a key institution in identifying public health risks, it took time assessing the threat posed by SARS-CoV-2 and its disease, COVID-19... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Time For MPs To Think For Themselves
One of the more frequently quoted statements of the Irish statesman and philosopher, Edmund Burke, was his observation that “Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgement, and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion.”... More>>