Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Anne Tolley admits 'outburst' in Peters super case

Anne Tolley admits 'outburst' in Winston Peters superannuation case
Craig McCulloch, Deputy Political Editor

Former National minister Anne Tolley has admitted telling her sister about Winston Peters' pension overpayment while she was "tired" and "cross" in a conversation she regretted.

Anne Tolley was called to give evidence at day four of Winston Peters' privacy case over his superannuation overpayments. Photo: RNZ / Patrice Allen

She said her "outburst" was after media had already been leaked the information.

The Opposition MP was in the witness box at the High Court in Auckland on Thursday morning to defend herself against claims she breached Mr Peters' privacy in 2017.

The High Court action relates to a leak in 2017 revealing Mr Peters was overpaid his superannuation by nearly $18,000 over seven years, and had paid it back.

Ms Tolley - as Minister for Social Development - had been briefed by the ministry's then-chief Brendan Boyle and was questioned in court about who she had then told.

Read more:
The Winston Peters case and the politicisation of the public service
Peters 'indignant and defensive' in call to ministry over error, court told
Winston Peters says MSD staff 'mistaken' in privacy lawsuit

She admitted that several weeks after that briefing she mentioned the overpayment to her sister, remarking that Mr Peters was "not as great as she thought".

Ms Tolley said the comment was in passing and she did not provide much detail.

"I sincerely regret my outburst with my sister. I was tired and I was cross," she told the court.

Mr Peters' lawyer Brian Henry asked: "So you're saying you're not trustworthy?"

"I wasn't in that circumstance. I regret it," Ms Tolley replied.

Ms Tolley pointed out that reporters at two newsrooms had already been tipped off by an anonymous source at that time.

She said she did not make the anonymous calls and did not arrange for them to be made.

"I have no knowledge of who did make those phone calls."

The MP revealed she also told her husband, her senior adviser and the prime minister's chief of staff, and trusted them all to keep the information secret.

She said she was "disappointed" her adviser - whose name is suppressed - then told other people in her office against her express instructions not to do so.

Ms Tolley said, however, she was "absolutely confident" none of the people told were responsible for the leak as they did not know details such as how much Mr Peters was overpaid.

Under questioning from Mr Henry, Ms Tolley said she wished MSD had never informed her of the matter in the first place.

"I wish they hadn't, because then I wouldn't be sitting here."

She said she relied on Mr Boyle to decide whether a briefing under the "no surprises" convention was appropriate.

Asked what she could do with the information she was told, Ms Tolley replied: "Nothing."

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Julie Webb-Pullman: Jacinda, THAT Tweet, And Gaza

The MFAT tweet condemning rocket fire from Gaza while failing to condemn the Israeli extrajudicial assassinations and civilian killings that generated Islamic Jihad’s rocket-fire in defensive response, reveals the hypocrisy at the heart of New Zealand’s so-called “even-handed” foreign policy and practice towards Palestine. More>>

Hope For Nature: A New Deal For The Commons

Joseph Cederwall on The Dig: To fully understand the biodiversity crisis and explore what comes next, it is necessary to address this mind-virus at the heart of our modern civilisation – the dominion worldview. More>>


Peace Plan: Ten Ways To Tackle Online Hate

A Helen Clark Foundation project to reduce online harm will be presented today in competition at the Paris Peace Forum... 'The Christchurch Principles' is the only Australasian initiative out of the 120 international projects chosen to be highlighted at the forum. More>>


Good Death: A Historical Perspective On Euthanasia

Some critics of the bill present religious and moral objections against euthanasia, while proponents have focused on the trauma and pain of terminally ill patients and their families. All these arguments have a long history. More>>

  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog