Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

PCE Simon Upton Argues NZU Free Allocation Is A Sham

First published in Energy and Environment on January 30, 2020.

Parliament’s Environment Committee resumed sitting this week hearing submissions on the Resource Management Amendment Bill and the Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Reform) Amendment Bill.

On the ETS reforms debate centred around the inclusion of bringing agricultural biological emissions in a backstop arrangements and treatment of ‘emissions-intensive trade-exposed eligible industrial activities’

The treatment of EITE activities is being intensified because of Climate Change Minister James Shaw desire to rethink the electricity allocation factor and in the longer term the baseline allocation.

This is outside the consideration of the committee, but is hearing submissions on the planned phase down of the free allocation of NZ units for EITE. The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Simon Upton told MPs the Bill should be changed so free allocation is only provided to EITE activities where there is a demonstrable risk of relocation of the activity overseas, and the relocation would result in an increase in global emissions.

He also took issue with the free allocation provided for agricultural activities of 95% saying instead it should be based on a clear rationale that is consistent with the 2050 target and NZ’s obligations under the Paris Agreement, and is reviewed as necessary.

The submission also recommends the Government explore alternative ways of mitigating risks of emission leakage, such as the use of a border emissions adjustment. Upton said “Notably, that mechanism is being actively considered by the European Union and could be more effective and efficient than the provision of free allocation going forward”. This EU proposal is receiving considerable push back, particularly from the US, which argues it is just a tariff by another name and threatened reprisals if enacted.

Upton said the free allocation was an overused subsidy with a “particularly lax” regime, which provides subsidies to activities that have no demonstrable risk of emissions leakage.

It both failed to incentivise the adoption of less emissions intensive production methods and potentially awards windfall gains to those who did reduce emissions.

“Unfortunately, the proposals in this Bill do not adequately address these defects and would not ensure that EITE activities undertake their fair share of the burden of meeting the 2050 target and NZ’s obligations under the Paris Agreement,” the submission said.

“If the free allocation regime is not tightened, agriculture and EITE activities will eventually consume most, if not all, of NZ’s entire emissions budget, placing considerable pressure on the rest of the economy. If the necessary emissions reductions cannot be achieved by the rest of the economy, the NZ government will need to address the shortfall through the purchase of international units”.

He said there was no analysis to establish there is a risk of emissions leakage, let alone that the leakage could result in an increase in global emissions.

“A cynic might well conclude that the regime is partly driven by unacknowledged considerations, such as the employment opportunities EITE activities create. It is, of course, open to Parliament to decide that such considerations should be taken into account. In that case, their inclusion should be transparently provided for. In my view, such an approach would amount to being blatantly protectionist at the expense of the world’s environment which NZ professes to be concerned about. As such it is not an amendment I could support.”

Upton said while the Bill does not specifically deal with allocative baselines, the Minister will be able to increase the phase out rates of the level of assistance for specific EITE activities in a range of circumstances, including a situation in which there is a ‘risk that the value of the allocation for the activity will exceed the cost of meeting the emissions trading scheme obligations in relation to the activity’.

However, the Minister should be required, rather than being merely permitted, to make appropriate adjustments, particularly given that we are being overly generous already,” Upton said.

In order to do this the Bill recommends the minister being given more powers to require information from those receiving a free allocation.

Upton said it has been originally intended to phase out the free allocation altogether by 2025.

“With just five years to go, no progress has been made. The Bill’s default phase out rates will not be sufficient to reduce free allocation to zero by 2050, despite the 2050 target in the same piece of legislation envisaging a level of emissions equivalent to net zero long-lived gases in that year.”

In regard to biological emissions, Upton said his preference was for them to be priced via a levy, rather than the ETS. However, if the Government pursues the option of having these emissions enter the ETS then it should explain the rationale for 95% free allocation as it would create little incentive to reduce emissions and the current proposed rate of phase out would continue free allocation for 95 years once it was triggered.

First published in Energy and Environment on January 30, 2020.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On Why The Supreme Court Is A Bigger Threat Than Trump To US Democracy

If you need a chilling reminder of how weirdly different the United States is to New Zealand…then abortion rights is the place to start. Last Friday, in a case called Hopkins vs Jegley , the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the right of the ... More>>


The Conversation: Rogue Poll Or Not, All The Signs Point To A Tectonic Shift In New Zealand Politics

Richard Shaw AAP(various)/NZ Greens (CC-BY-SA)/The Conversation Strong team. More jobs. Better economy. So say the National Party’s campaign hoardings. Only thing is, last Sunday’s Newshub-Reid Research poll – which had support for the Labour ... More>>

Dunne Speaks: It's Time For Matariki Day

The period of Matariki, the celebration of the Māori New Year, which began earlier this week, is being celebrated increasingly as an important national event. While many other countries have their own form of New Year celebrations, Matariki is uniquely ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Why We Shouldn’t Be Pushed Into Re-Opening Our Borders

I believe in yesterday as much as Paul McCartney, but it was bemusing to see the amount of media attention lavished last week on the pandemic-related musings by former government science adviser Sir Peter Gluckman, former Prime Minister Helen Clark ... More>>

The Coronavirus Republic: Three Million Infections And Rising

The United States is famed for doing things, not to scale, but off it. Size is the be-all and end-all, and the coronavirus is now doing its bit to assure that the country remains unrivalled in the charts of infection . In time, other unfortunates may well ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Altars Of Hypocrisy: George Floyd, Protest And Black Face

Be wary what you protest about. The modern moral constabulary are out, and they are assisted by their Silicon Valley friends in the Social Media club. Should you dare take a stand on anything, especially in a dramatic way, you will be found out ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Welcome Deaths: Coronavirus And The Open Plan Office

For anybody familiar with that gruesome manifestation of the modern work place, namely the open plan office, the advent of coronavirus might be something of a relief. The prospects for infection in such spaces is simply too great. You are at risk from ... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Why Thinking Makes It So: Donald Trump’s Obamagate Fixation

The “gate” suffix has been wearing thin since the break-in scandal that gave it its birth. Since Watergate, virtually anything dubious and suggestive, and much more besides, is suffixed. Which brings us to the issue of President Donald Trump’s ... More>>