Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Will Australia's President be a Poodle?

The Australian Democrats yesterday backed down over the republic referendum question, leaving voters with the prospect of choosing between the present constitutional monarchy, or a republic that few voters favour - a politicians' republic.

The referendum wording agreed to by Cabinet on Monday stands - referring to a President appointed by a two-thirds majority of Federal Parliament.

The Democrats' backdown came after the government refused to change the referendum Bill in this respect, after the Bill was returned to the Lower House following rejection in the Upper House on Wednesday.

Changes to the Bill include provision for a further constitutional convention within three to five years.

The Democrat's "win" from challenging the Government relates to the preamble. Changes here include: removal of the reference to "mateship"; insertion of wording referring to the "kinship" of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders with the land; and a reference to protecting the environment.

The leader of the Democrats, Meg Lees, said she did not believe the Democrats should stop the referendum proceeding.

The Democrats had made it clear from the outset they would back down if Howard stood firm.

The Democrats seem to have taken the view they, not the Government, would have suffered the fallout from deferring a referendum.

But this is not an obvious conclusion, given most of the public appear opposed to the Howard question and the Keating-Turnbull, politicians' republic. More than half the electorate appears to prefer a directly elected presidency.

So there seems a reasonable prospect the Government, not the Democrats, might have suffered the fallout from a deferred referendum.

So the Democrats' position suggests they are either ineffectual (Keating's "fairies" thesis) or do not fundamentally disagree with the Keating-Turnbull republic model.

Certainly, the Democrats have been reluctant to address the real issues, suggesting the latter possibility might be a factor.

Independent Tasmanian Green Senator, Bob Brown, made scathing remarks over the Democrats' backdown.

"The Democrats are becoming political poodles, people who run round the room barking - then jump in the first lap available," he said.

Meanwhile the public debate on the matter has yet again been diverted to the preamble.

While the preamble is not completely trivial, it is insignificant compared with the real issue - which is addressing the "kingly powers" that at present reside with the monarchy under the Australian constitution.

At present the Head of State can defer or reject outright Bills passed by Parliament and is technically in charge of the armed forces.

The fact these powers are not used, or even widely known about, is NOT because of anything in the constitution itself. Rather, it is due to the declining legitimacy of the monarchy.

If the Head of State were elected, on the other hand, legitimacy would be restored, opening the possibility or even likelihood the Head of Sate would begin to exercise his or her constitutional powers.

Indeed, depending on the electoral system used for electing a President, the President might claim higher legitimacy than the PM and ruling party. Right now, for instance, the Government of the day received less electoral support than the Opposition, thanks to Australia's modified first past the past electoral system.

Clearly, the political establishment is horrified by the prospect of a US style Presidency. Yet an executive presidency is a distinctly possible outcome given the current constitution.

The Australian public has, however, shown no appetite for an executive style presidency.

So what the debate should be focusing on is limiting the "kingly powers" accorded to the Head of State under the constitution.

The objective would be a non-executive presidency, with limited powers.

This is the point the Anarchists made to the Marxists well before the Russian Revolution - it doesn't matter who's in power, it's how much power they have that matters.

Instead of limiting the powers of the Head of State, however, the Keating-Turnbull solution is to neuter the present kingly powers by making the Head of State beholden to the PM of the day.

So if the referendum is passed, Australia will get a President.

But always remember this: the Australian President will be like the so-called Democrats - a poodle.

Simon Orme made narrow escapes from both the New Zealand Treasury and Ministry of Foreign Affairs and now lives in Sydney, attempting to make the NSW electricity sector user friendly.


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Reese Erlich: Foreign Correspondent: Trump Plays Both Sides Against The Middle

Is he a hawk? Is he a peacenik? The President keeps us guessing . By Reese Erlich President Donald Trump has convinced Republican isolationists and hawks that he supports their views. That’s a neat trick, since the two groups hold opposing positions. ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Waiting For The Old Bailey: Julian Assange And Britain’s Judicial Establishment

On September 7, Julian Assange will be facing another round of gruelling extradition proceedings, in the Old Bailey, part of a process that has become a form of gradual state-sanctioned torture. The US Department of Justice hungers for their man. The More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Sorry Plight Of The International Education Sector

Tourism and international education have been two of the sectors hardest hit by the pandemic. They’re both key export industries. Yet the government response to them has been strikingly different. There has been nothing beyond a few words of ministerial condolence and a $51.6 million package (details below) to get the sector through the pandemic...

Binoy Kampmark: Google’s Open Letter: Fighting Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code

Tech giants tend to cast thin veils over threats regarding government regulations. They are also particularly concerned by those more public spirited ones, the sort supposedly made for the broader interest. Google has given us an example of this ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Trump’s Current Chances Of Re-Election

By now it seems clear that National have no fresh ideas to offer for how New Zealand could avoid the Covid-19 economic crisis. As in the past, National has set an arbitrary 30% ratio of government debt to GDP that it aims to achieve “in a decade or so,” ... More>>

The Conversation: Rogue Poll Or Not, All The Signs Point To A Tectonic Shift In New Zealand Politics

Richard Shaw AAP(various)/NZ Greens (CC-BY-SA)/The Conversation Strong team. More jobs. Better economy. So say the National Party’s campaign hoardings. Only thing is, last Sunday’s Newshub-Reid Research poll – which had support for the Labour ... More>>

The Coronavirus Republic: Three Million Infections And Rising

The United States is famed for doing things, not to scale, but off it. Size is the be-all and end-all, and the coronavirus is now doing its bit to assure that the country remains unrivalled in the charts of infection . In time, other unfortunates may well ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Altars Of Hypocrisy: George Floyd, Protest And Black Face

Be wary what you protest about. The modern moral constabulary are out, and they are assisted by their Silicon Valley friends in the Social Media club. Should you dare take a stand on anything, especially in a dramatic way, you will be found out ... More>>