1999
The following are
paraphrases of today's questions for oral answer.
They
are not complete or official, the official record
of
Parliamentary proceedings is Hansard, which is not
finalised some days
after the event.
Question 1.
Rod Donald to the Minister of Internal Affairs Jack Elder:
Q: Will he be seeking the resignation of the
National Party members
on the Lotteries Commission in the
light of the Prime Minister's
criticism of the salary
package they approved for their chief
executive against
the advice of the State Services Commissioner; if
not,
why not?
A: (Wyatt Creech on behalf) The government's
investigation is still
underway. It would be premature to
move hastily. However the member
can rest assured that we
will move quickly once we know where the
responsibility
lies.
Q: (Rod Donald - Greens) When will Mr Thompson be sacked?
A: I am unaware of any advice that Geoff Thompson
will be sacked.
While a considerable amount is already
known about this issue more
information is still
required.
Q: (Annette King - Labour) Do the National
Party appointees have
special protection?
A: People
are appointed to boards because of their quality. If
you
look at boards overall most board members are not.
Secondly
membership of the National Party is not
protecting this board - it is
being investigated
properly.
Question 2.
Warren Kyd to the Minister for Enterprise and Commerce Max Bradford:
Q: Has
he received any reports on the growth of labour
productivity,
jobs and real incomes since 1991; if so,
what do those reports say?
A: A recent study found a
significant productivity surge after 1993
was likely to
be partly due to the ECA. Since June 1991 employment
has
grown by 277,000 jobs. This represents average
employment growth of
2.3%. And average earnings have
increased. Statistics show there has
been a 5% real
increase in wages, add on top of this the tax cuts
and
employees are clearly better off. A recent survey
found three out of
four employees are happy with their
employment relationships. The
Labour Party line would
result in disharmony. Why mess with success?
Q: (Pete
Hodgson - Labour) Can he confirm that the use of OECD
data
in this study is not standard practice and that the
report contains a
disclaimer from Treasury?
A: As hard
as the Labour Party will try to demolish an
authoritative
report of labour productivity they can't.
They know they are on the
wrong side of the argument on
the ECA. The simple fact is that since
the ECA we have
had far fewer strikes. Strikes cause reductions
in
productivity and that is what Labour Party policy
would achieve.
Question 3.
Rt Hon. Helen Clark to the Prime Minister Jenny Shipley:
Q: Does she
agree with Hon Chris Fletcher's statement that she
did
not make any specific requests in return for her vote
for the tax cut
legislation; if so, which of her own
members did make unacceptable
demands?
A: (Wyatt
Creech on behalf) Senior ministers and the
caucus
considered issues of timing. The government is
under no pressure to
proceed with this bill and so it has
decided not to proceed with it.
Q: (Helen Clark - Labour)
Asked question again. Why can't she answer
or did she
make it up again?
A: Helen Clark is making up her
questions top try and give legs to an
issue which has no
legs. The government is committed to tax cuts.
When we
are returned to office we will cut taxes. The
government's
commitment to social spending is clear. We
will match tax cuts with
increases to social spending. It
will not be done at the expense of
social
spending.
(Helen Clark - Labour - leave to table a letter
from Christine
Fletcher to Bill English making no
unacceptable demands - granted)
Question 4.
Hon. Brian Donnelly to the Minister of Corrections Clem Simich:
Q: When is he going to announce where and in what
location a prison
in Northland is to be built?
A: I
appreciate that this issue is of considerable interest.
However
it is my intention that the decision be the right
one based on the
full facts. I have been briefed on this
and have requested further
information. There has been no
duck-shoving around we are following
proper process. When
a decision is made I will make an announcement. I
have
had representations from all Northland members particularly
from
John Carter on this issue. They are concerned for
their constituents
in the area. As soon as a decision is
made everybody will be notified.
Q: (Tau Henare - Mauri
Pacific) Is the minister aware of a resolution
by Nga
Puhi that they do not want a prison in their area unless
they
own and operate it.
A: Resolutions passed by Nga
Puhi have been presented to me by Tau
Henare and I will
take them into consideration.
Question 5.
Hon. Annette King to the Prime Minister Jenny Shipley:
Q: Is
National Party membership a consideration for appointment
by
the Government to the New Zealand Lotteries
Commission; if not, which
of the current members is not
or has not been a National Party member
or office
holder?
A: (Wyatt Creech on behalf) Party political
membership is not a
consideration. The government has a
policy of appointing capable
people to government bodies.
Like for example David Caygill to the ACC
was that a
party political appointment?
Q: (Jerry Brownlee - National) Can we have a few more examples?
A: We
endeavour to appoint on a non-partisan basis. Stan Roger
was
appointed to a health position. Other examples
include Margaret
Shileds, Ann Hercus and Mike Moore have
all had their appointments to
high office supported by
the government
Q: (Grant Gillon - Alliance) What
qualifications does Jim Bolger's
former electorate
secretary have for her position on the
Lotteries
Commission.
A: I do not know the details but
I understand that she is a good
capable person capable of
doing a good job. I note also that we
appointed Gilbert
Myles an NZ First member to the TAB.
Question 6.
Rev. Ann Batten to the Minister for the Environment Simon Upton:
Q: When will the Government
announce its plans to make local
authorities culpable for
historically contaminated sites?
A: (Nick Smith on
behalf) The government is not considering making
local
authorities responsible for contamination. We are
considering
issues of responsibility and the minister
will address the matter on
his
return.