Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


Standards NZ Report Launch - Sutton Speech

Hon Jim Sutton Speech Notes
22 August 2001

Standards NZ Report Launch, Wellington

Ladies and Gentlemen: thank you for inviting me here today.

I welcome the release of this report. It was project managed by Standards NZ and funded by Trade NZ, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, and the Ministry for Economic Development.

It sets out clearly for us just how much of a burden non-tariff trade barriers are to our exporters and potential exporters.

The rise of non-tariff barriers as a trade issue is paradoxically a sign of how successful Governments over the years have been in reducing tariff barriers. As the tariff tide has gone out, it has left more clearly exposed than ever before all the other rocks and shoals that are an obstacle to international trade.

Non-tariff barriers encompass all the rules and regulations that stop us from doing or selling what we like when we like. These days, probably the most significant non-tariff barriers - certainly borne out by the AC Nielsen survey - are standards.

Standards regulate not what crosses a border but what can be legally sold inside it - but if importers can't sell your product in a market of interest, they will hardly want to buy it from you.

Although usually imposed for perfectly legitimate reasons such as health and safety or environmental protection, the mere fact that standards vary from country to country is a real nuisance to exporters and adds to their costs.

The last big round of comprehensive multilateral trade negotiations set out some important rules on standards. The standards, and the procedures for assessing the conformity of products against them, must not be more trade-restrictive than necessary to achieve their purpose.

If an international standard exists, you must follow it unless you have a good reason for departing from it. As well, standards must be transparent, that is, each member of the World Trade Organisation has to designate an "enquiry point" where prospective exporters can find out exactly what standards applying to their product in that country they must comply with. In New Zealand, that's Standards NZ.

Where standards and other non-tariff barriers remain, we need to know about them if we are to do anything about them. This is the value of this survey. It tells us whether we are concentrating our negotiating effort in the right areas - generally, we are.

Trade barriers are not the sort of thing on which the Government can promise instant results - getting rid of them needs to be seen as a long-term hard slog.

And often nations relinquishing their non-tariff trade barriers want a quid pro quo. That is why multilateral trade rounds,such as the one we hope will be launched at Doha later this year, are vital to keep the system functioning. They act as a supplement to negotiating one-on-one for the removal of a particular barrier. Instead, rounds can develop worldwide rules that deprive whole classes of barriers of legitimacy when used as cover for protectionism.

Of course, protectionist instincts remain strong. In the past, the trade game has been like the tax game: just as new avoidance schemes tend to emerge whenever governments shut existing ones down, so the efforts of traders to sweep away old barriers can be frustrated by the erection of new ones.

In fact we can see this happening now against our brand-new organic agriculture export industry.

On Monday, the Ministry for the Environment released a report about New Zealand's clean, green image. Based on the responses of two British importers, we were told that should there be field trials of GM plants, Britain would no longer want to import any of our food - organic or conventional.

This strikes me as extremely odd: I am told that Britain, the United States, and Europe have thriving organic industries. Yet all these places have GM food field trials, and in some cases, more than that. Despite that, it is still possible to produce GM food in Britain - so why not in New Zealand??

In Europe, the concept of "food miles" is gaining strength. So even if our food exports were all clean, green, and totally organic, they would still not be acceptable in Europe because they had to be flown or shipped 12,000 kilometres to market, using resources to get there.

That concept has the potential to become a serious non-tariff trade barrier.

Recently, I met a Green MEP - frequently quoted as an "authority" on the evils of international trade in food. It quickly became clear her calculations were based on the assumption that all New Zealand's food exports were air-freighted. I disabused her of this, but within the hour, she was repeating the same misinformation to others. Truly, protectionists are often reluctant to allow the facts to get in the way of a good story. According to the report we're launching today, it is clear that non-tariff trade barriers tend to be most prevalent and most significant in areas of traditional sensitivity - especially food. The most intractable barriers apply to foodstuffs, exported under quota to countries such as the European Union, the United States, and Japan.

This report indicates priorities for follow-up work by isolating barriers in terms of relative seriousness and country of application. For the first time we have clear and specific details of compliance cost problems.

As well, we have learned that non-tariff trade barriers are increasing in some areas (in spite of the Uruguay Round). And we have discovered a significant incidence of standards and conformance problems.

This report has given us in the Government much to think about, and will help us formulate our strategy in improving market access for our exporters. New and inexperienced exporters can learn from the strategies identified by successful established exporters.

I commend this report to you all.

Thank you.

Office of Hon Jim Sutton

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Fate Of Julian Assange

Has swapping Scott Morrison for Anthony Albanese made any discernible difference to Australia’s relations with the US, China, the Pacific and New Zealand? Not so far. For example: Albanese has asked for more time to “consider” his response to New Zealand’s long running complaints about the so called “501” deportations back to this country. Really? He needs more time to figure out a response? OK, but the clock is ticking.
The Julian Assange situation is a lot more urgent. Assange’s deportation to the United States has now been okayed by the British courts and also - crucially – by its government. At any moment, Assange could be on a plane and headed for a US prison. He is facing the prospect of 175 years in jail...


Parliament: Grounds Fully Reopened

Parliament’s grounds have been fully reopened today at a ceremony and community event with mana whenua, members of the public, and representatives of Parliament... More>>

Chris Hipkins: Statement On Charlotte Bellis

On 31 January I released a statement regarding Charlotte Bellis and her MIQ application. I stated that emergency allocation criteria includes a requirement to travel to New Zealand within the next 14 days... More>>

Government: Prime Minister To Travel To Europe And Australia

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern will leave this weekend to travel to Europe and Australia for a range of trade, tourism and foreign policy events... More>>


National: Goodfellow To Retire As Party President
Peter Goodfellow today announced he will not seek re-election as President of the National Party at its Annual Conference. Mr Goodfellow will remain as a director on the board for one final term to assist in the transition... More>>

Police: Parliament Occupation Investigators Seek Public Assistance
Police investigating criminal activity on the final day of the occupation at Parliament grounds earlier this year are appealing for the public’s help to identify 15 people... More>>

World Vision: New Zealand Urged To Meet Quota As New Report Finds Hunger, Violence, And Death Rates Increase For Refugees
World Vision is calling for New Zealand to work harder to meet its refugee quota in the wake of a new report which shows that life has deteriorated significantly in the past two years for refugees in 11 hard-hit countries... More>>




InfoPages News Channels