Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Prescription changes costly and wasteful
Prescription changes costly and wasteful
Plans to go back to three-monthly prescriptions will mean a huge waste of drugs and big costs for patients, says National Health Spokesperson Dr Lynda Scott. "As a former geriatrician I remember removing shopping bags full of unused medications from old people's homes because the drugs had just been left to waste," Dr Scott said.
Drug funding agency Pharmac wants to change from one-monthly prescribing to drug allocations of three-months to save money.
"National changed to one month prescriptions in 1997 because there was so much waste. People were throwing away the drugs when they got side effects in the first week," Dr Scott said.
"What
we need is a compromise where first-time prescriptions are a
one month allocation, so that patients can work out if the
drug agrees with them, to prevent waste and additional cost.
"Rest homes tell me that either they or their residents will
be paying an extra $250 to $300 a year for drugs because
under three month allocations they'll lose a subsidy that
many pharmacists choose to give relating to the packaging of
drugs. Residential facilities will also have to keep a
massive stock of pills and this is unsafe," says Dr Scott.
Gordon Campbell: On unemployment, Winston Peters’ low boiling point and music criticism
NZ Government: Government Recommits To Equal Pay
Emily Ireland - Local Democracy Reporter: Deputy Mayor ‘disgusted’ By Response To Georgina Beyer Sculpture
Te Pāti Māori: Māori Unemployment Rate Increases By More Than Four-Times National Rates
Government: Streamlining Building Consent Changes
Koi Tu - The Centre for Informed Futures: If Not Journalists, Then Who?
FIRST Union: May Day, The Biggest Threat To NZ Workers In 2024 Is Our Government
