Celebrating 25 Years of Scoop
Special: Up To 25% Off Scoop Pro Learn More
Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Was the election spending furore necessary?

Friday, 27 October 2006

Copeland: Was the election spending furore necessary?

United Future MP Gordon Copeland is suggesting the recent prolonged row over use of Parliamentary funds for electioneering may never have happened, if the police had decided to prosecute the Labour Party over its pledge card spending.

"This arises," he says, "from an analysis of the timing of events surrounding the Auditor-General's controversial report on parties' advertising expenditure in the three months before the 2005 general election.

"On 9 February 2006 the Electoral Commission laid a complaint with the police concerning Labour's $418,000 breach of their election spending cap.

"On 17 March 2006 the acting Assistant Commissioner of Police, Roger Carson, reported that the police had decided not to prosecute the New Zealand Labour Party under section 214B of the Electoral Act.

"Police found a prima facie case to charge the Labour Party but decided to issue only a warning.

"On 22 March however the police advised the Chief Electoral Officer, David Henry (who had also expressed concern about Labour's pledge card expenditure), that they would contact the Auditor-General to discuss improvements to the rules governing government and parliamentary spending on publicity and advertising.

"Approximately one month later on 19 April the then-Solicitor General, responding to a request from the Auditor-General, issued the opinion which led to Mr Brady's finding that some advertising expenditure incurred by political parties in the three months before the 2005 general election was unlawful.

"This raises some interesting questions. Did the Auditor-General seek a legal opinion from the Solicitor-General only after the police raised their concerns with him?

"Would the Auditor-General have taken that action if the police had proceeded to prosecute Labour for their $418,000 breach of the spending cap?

"If not, then the events of recent weeks might never have happened."

ENDS

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.