SunSmart shame: alarming results of sunbed survey
> 16 November 2007
> SunSmart shame: alarming results of
sunbed survey
>
> A Green Party survey of sunbed
operations in the Wellington region has
> found that most
are flouting industry standards and many are exposing
>
young girls to serious health risks.
>
> Nearly
half of the clinics surveyed have no minimum age limit
for
> customers and allow under 15 year olds to use their
tanning
> facilities, despite industry guidelines
stipulating that under 15 year
> olds should never use
sunbeds, and under 18 year olds only with
> parental
approval.
>
> Studies by The International Agency for
Research on Cancer show that
> the risk of developing
melanoma increased by 75 percent among those
> who had
first used a solarium in their teens or twenties.
>
>
Green Party Health spokesperson Sue Kedgley said the results
were
> particularly concerning coming as they did at the
end of SunSmart
> week, and showed an urgent need for
industry regulation.
>
> "These results show the
urgent need for the new Minister of Health to
> regulate
the sunbed industry," Ms Kedgley says.
>
> "It is
completely unacceptable for professionals to expose children
to
> UV rays up to five times the strength of the midday
summer sun."
>
> Ms Kedgley said the survey also
revealed that in some instances
> clinics are using
safety information that the New Zealand Cancer
> Society
says is 'dangerous and misleading'.
>
> "The
information some of these outfits are basing their practice
on is
> completely incorrect, which raises more ethical
and legal issues," Ms
> Kedgley says.
>
> One
clinic gets its safety information from a website which
says:
> "There actually have been no statistically
significant connections
> found between moderate indoor
tanning and increased melanoma risk".
>
> "This sort
of information is simply wrong, and encourages the
>
perception many young girls have that sunbeds are a safe way
to get a
> tan. Many young girls are completely unaware
that they may be
> increasing their melanoma risk by 75
percent.
>
> "It's not just back-alley businesses who
are in question here. Some of
> the worst results came
from big name gyms."
>
ends
>
>