Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More
Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

ACT Would Remove Cultural Background Reports For Sentencing

“ACT is proposing to remove Section 26(2)(a) and Section 27 of the Sentencing Act 2002, which allows criminals to gain shortened sentences by undergoing cultural background reports,” says ACT Leader David Seymour.

“These reports are leading to massively reduced sentences for some of our most hardened criminals, by focussing on the background of the offender our justice system is failing to properly acknowledge the victim.

“Section 26(2)(a) of the Sentencing Act says ‘A pre-sentence report may include — information regarding the personal, family, whanau, community, and cultural background, and social circumstances of the offender.’

“Section 27(1)(a) entitles criminals to have the Court hear witnesses about their background including their cultural background. There is no culture in New Zealand where violence is acceptable. There is no crime that is justified by being alienated by culture. These sections should go.

"They’ve also created a cottage industry within our justice system. Stuff reports that the cost commissioning cultural reports has almost doubled in the last financial year. Between July 1 2021 and June 30 2022, 2,328 cultural reports were commissioned at a cost of $5.91m paid by the state.

“A few months ago, a man who punched a pregnant woman unconscious was let out on home detention, because a cultural background report found he hadn’t been properly introduced to his whakapapa. This man was being charged for punching the woman pregnant with his seventeenth child. I wonder how many of them will be connected with their whakapapa by knowing their father, and whether that would be a good thing?

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

“In 2021 a man who had beaten, strangled and threatened to kill his former partner for several months received a 10 per cent reduction in his sentence, despite the Judge describing the cultural report as being of “limited value as it consisted mainly of observations by others and little from Huata himself.”

“Then just yesterday a pair of Mongrel Mob members running a major meth operation received up to 30 per cent discounts on their sentence because of reports into their upbringing. What about the countless lives that have been ruined by the methamphetamine they produced and distributed?

“They say justice is blind, but in New Zealand we appear to hand out massively reduced sentences for criminals who have had troubled upbringings. ACT says we need to focus on the victims. 

“We also need to ask ourselves if this money is best spent going to consultants, or being used to help with rehabilitation and supporting victims. 

“Only in New Zealand. We have a Government that thinks reducing the prison population is more important than keeping people safe. By removing this part of the Sentencing Act 2002 we can make our country safer and ensure that sentencing is appropriate to the crime.”

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.