Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Fraser High School compensation claim assessed


29 September 2004

Fraser High School compensation claim assessed

The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) has informed Hamilton’s Fraser High School that its compensation claim for the cost of relief teachers to cover staff absences during the 2003 Asian Gypsy Moth eradication operation has not been accepted, Director of Forest Biosecurity Peter Thomson said today.

Claims for compensation can be lodged with MAF in accordance with section 162A of the Biosecurity Act 1993 by parties who consider they have suffered loss as a result of actions MAF has taken to manage or eradicate any unwanted organism.

“Fraser High School made a claim to be compensated for what they believed to be the extra cost of relief teachers used to cover staff who took leave during the aerial operations to eradication the Asian Gypsy moth late in 2003,” Peter Thomson said.

“An independent investigation conducted by Sundial Group into the claim, determined there was ample opportunity for the school to make use of resources provided by the Ministry of Education to alleviate any cost impact on staffing resources caused by teachers taking leave because of the aerial operation. Education officials worked intensively with Fraser High School and identified $25,000 of staff funding management efficiency gains. The value of these gains was twice that of the Fraser High School claim.

“Ministry of Education records show that at the time of the aerial operations in Hamilton, Fraser High had considerable credits for sick leave available – 512 days in total.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

“The report concluded that it was not plausible to consider that the taxpayer, having provided funding support through the Ministry of Education, should be asked to pay again through a compensation claim with MAF. As the relief funding rests with the Ministry not with the school, at no time was the school out of pocket. If any payment had been made to Fraser High by the MAF it would have effectively been regarded as “double-dipping,” Peter Thomson said

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.