Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Big Game Fishing Council & Anor v Sanford & Ors

NZ BIG GAME FISHING COUNCIL INC AND ANOR v SANFORD LIMITED AND ORS SC 40/2008
[2 October 2008]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
SC 40/2008
[2008] NZSC 74

BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND BIG GAME FISHING COUNCIL INC
First Appellant

AND THE NEW ZEALAND RECREATIONAL FISHING COUNCIL INC
Second Appellant

AND SANFORD LIMITED, SEALORD GROUP LIMITED AND PELAGIC & TUNA NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
First Respondents

AND MINISTER OF FISHERIES
Second Respondent

AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF FISHERIES
Third Respondent

Court: Elias CJ and McGrath J
Counsel: A R Galbraith QC and S Ryan for Appellants
B A Scott and G T Carter for First Respondent
A E L Ivory and P A McCarthy for Second and Third Respondents

Judgment: 2 October 2008

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

A The application for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Sanford Ltd v The New Zealand Recreational Fishing Council Inc [2008] NZCA 160 is granted.

B The approved ground of appeal is:
Did the Minister of Fisheries, when setting the total allowable commercial catch for Kahawai under s 21 of the Fisheries Act 1996 in 2004 and 2005, act in accordance with statutory requirements?

C The appellants’ application for leave to respond to the submissions of the respondents on the leave application is consequentially dismissed.

REASONS

[1] The application for leave to appeal is granted on the basis of the first appellant’s submissions of 6 August 2008 in support of granting leave. Having considered those submissions, along with submissions from the respondents each dated 27 August 2008, it was not necessary for the Court to address the further “factual context” submissions made for the appellants dated 3 September 2008. The appellants’ application for leave to file the further submissions in reply to those of the respondents is accordingly dismissed.

Solicitors:
Hesketh Henry, Auckland for Appellants
Chapman Tripp , Wellington for First Respondents
Crown Law Office, Wellington for Second and Third Respondents


[SC_40_2008_NZ_Big_Game_Fishing_Council.pdf]

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.