Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Health minister fudges family figures

14 June 2012

Health minister fudges family figures

Social change and diversity advocate Philip Patston says Hon Tony Ryall, speaking on Radio New Zealand on 13 June, clearly omitted to tell the other side of the fiscal impact of the government's decision not to appeal the Court of Appeal decision in the Ministry of Health v Atkinson & Others Family Carers case.

In his blog, Patston argued, "Ryall said the cost of paying families will rise as more family members opt to be supported by their relatives. However if, as he said, these people were assessed as eligible for funding, the money would need to be allocated anyway. What he didn't say was that the money would either go to a non-family member or a residential home instead.

"He also didn't say that, if a person eligible for funded support chose to leave a residential home in favour of family support, the money would go from the residential home to the family. Nor did he mention that it is ministry of health policy to encourage community over residential living and that, over time, the fiscal implications of losing the critical mass of demand for residential homes will save significant amounts spent on the administration of such homes."

Patston believes the government's continued appeals against the discrimination decisions has had nothing to do with reducing the cost of support. Rather, he says, "it has been to prevent losing the savings it has made, discriminating by not paying family members."

Patston observed Ryall then went on to express concern about the State interfering in family relationships by monitoring the quality of service provision. "This is clearly nonsense," said Patston. "Any family member agreeing to be paid would implicitly agree to be monitored, just as a family business would expect a family employee to be subject to performance reviews.

"The opposite is actually true — currently unpaid family support goes entirely unscrutinised by the disability support system and leaves disabled people potentially open to abuse and neglect."

www.diversitynz.com

ENDS

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.