Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Peer Review of Justice Eichelbaum report required


Peer Review of Justice Eichelbaum report into Peter Ellis case required


Justice Minister Judith Collins' announcement that justice knows no price tag is welcomed by both peterellis.org.nz and independent researcher Ross Francis. In 1993 Peter Ellis was convicted of sexual crimes against children. His case has long been considered New Zealand's most egregious miscarriage of justice.

In light of Judith Collins' decision to peer review Justice Binnie's report into David Bain's compensation claim, peterellis.org.nz calls upon the minister to also peer review Justice Eichelbaum's 2001 report into the Peter Ellis case.

Independent researcher Ross Francis published two articles in the New Zealand Law Journal in 2007, entitled New Evidence in the Peter Ellis Case. He identified significant errors in the Eichelbaum report.

Eichelbaum claimed that the Ellis case had had the "most thorough examination possible" and that Ellis' convictions were not unsafe.

However, Justice Eichelbaum could not consider new evidence, nor could he compel witnesses. The inquiry's narrow terms of reference excluded many important matters from being examined, and the process lacked transparency. Eichelbaum chose not to look at aspects of the investigation that had direct bearing on the probative value of the children's evidence.

His report and the reports of the two expert witnesses he chose have never been peer reviewed.

Eichelbaum's report is written on the basis that the children's testimony was credible and reliable. This is despite the fact that the children were subject to suggestive and leading questions, and some children made bizarre allegations, including allegations of satanic abuse. Graham Davies, one of the two selected experts, wrote that such allegations were "the stuff of children's fiction."

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Eichelbaum concluded that by present day standards the formal interviews were of a "good overall quality". Recent reviews of the children's interviews by Professor Harlene Hayne and Dr Michael Lamb suggest the interviewing was poor.

Now that Justice Minister Collins has peer reviewed Justice Binnie's report and has spared no expense in the process, it is time for her to be consistent and order a review of Justice Eichelbaum's seriously flawed report.
:
ends

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.