Court ruling fails to uphold equity and child wellbeing

The Court of Appeal ruling released yesterday that the discrimination inherent in the In-Work Tax Credit is justified, ignores the evidence that poverty is damaging children and government policy is a central cause, says Every Child Counts.

“The suggestion that governments are justified in introducing benefits that discriminate against children and that undermine the wellbeing of children is very concerning,” said Deborah Morris-Travers, manager of Every Child Counts.

“The court case was brought by the Child Poverty Action Group and centred on whether or not it was acceptable for the government to discriminate against the nation’s poorest children, in homes with no adult working, by preventing them access to a $60 tax credit.

“While the Court has acknowledged that the In-Work Tax Credit is discriminatory and causes harm, it has said that this is justified. It is very concerning that the Court would seek to justify the harms caused by discrimination and not uphold the principles of fairness and equity especially when government policy is a central cause of that harm. Our government has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and is therefore obliged to ensure that children’s right to an adequate standard of living are met in an equitable and not a discriminatory way.

“Sadly, today’s ruling means our nation’s poorest children lose. The evidence that poverty is making children sick, reducing their success in education and diminishing their long-term prospects for wellbeing is very clear. The court could have acted as a check on government policy that is discriminatory and creates hardship for children. Instead, it is justifying a policy that increases the vulnerability and hardship of families who most need our support.

“While we appreciate that there is always a need for governments to juggle priorities, decisions that discriminate against families with small children and leave them in poverty have to be questioned. The Child Poverty Action Group has done the right thing by questioning this policy and seeking a ruling on it in the court. It is a shame the outcome didn’t come out on the side of equity for all children,” concludes Ms Morris-Travers.
ends

© Scoop Media

Gordon Campbell: On The New Government’s Policies Of Yesteryear

Winston Peters is routinely described as the kingmaker who decides whether the centre right or the centre-left has a turn at running this country. He also plays a less heralded, but equally important role as the scapegoat who can be blamed for killing taxes that his senior partners never much wanted in the first place. Neither Ardern nor Robertson for example, really wanted a capital gains tax, for fear of Labour copping the “tax and spend“ label they ended up being saddled with anyway. Usefully though, they could tell the party faithful it was wicked old Winston who killed the CGT... More

Government: National, ACT, & NZ First To Deliver For All Kiwis

The National Party claims the new coalition government will be stable, effective, and will deliver for all Kiwis. "Despite the challenging economic environment, New Zealanders can look forward to a better future because of the changes the new Government will make ... We know that, with the right leadership, the right policies, and the right direction, together New Zealanders can make this an even better country," says Christopher Luxon... More

ALSO:

• ACT - Real Change Begins Today
• Green Party - A Strong Opposition To Divisive Government
• Te Pati Maori - Luxon’s Government Will Whitewash Aotearoa
• NZ College Of Midwives - College Supports Solution Focussed Approach For New Health Minister
• Federation of Primary Health - Yes Minister – The Federation Is Looking Forward To Working With You