Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Evidence undermines insulation standards, $4000 penalty

Evidence provided to the Government undermines both current rental property insulation requirements and makes a mockery of a $4000 penalty for non-compliance, Tenancies War spokesman Mike Butler said today.

Owners are required to install both ceiling and underfloor insulation by July 1 or face a penalty of $4000 payable to the person who reports it[1], Mr Butler said.

The penalty applies to subfloor insulation which has little quantifiable benefit to tenants or owners, he said.

This is because the floor and air leakage account for only 9 percent heat loss in an uninsulated timber-framed house in which 30–35 percent of heat is lost through the roof, 21–31 percent through the windows, and 18–25 percent through the walls.[2]
The Residential Tenancies (Smoke Alarms and Insulation) Regulations 2016 currently requires R 2.9 insulation for ceilings and R 1.3 for underfloor in most of the North Island.[3]
These specs exceed advice to the Government that a 1978 requirement of R 1.9 in ceilings brought the biggest energy savings, Mr Butler said.[4]
Additional insulation over 1978 requirements is of decreasing benefit to tenants and a waste of money for owners, he said.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

In fact, every dollar spent on topping up insulation in 190,000 buildings to the standards proposed would only bring a 39-cent benefit according to a report by economist Ian Harrison, of Tailrisk Economics, released just before Christmas.[5]
Besides the waste of a poorly focused policy, the $4000 penalty payable to a complainant has created an incentive for the unscrupulous few to remove insulation for financial gain, Mr Butler said.

This means that owners will gave to carry out regular checks to ensure that their insulation is still there, Mr Butler said.

At least there should be a $3000 penalty for tampering with or removing insulation since there is a $3000 penalty for tampering with or removing smoke sensors, he said.

The Government has lost sight of the fact that insulation merely improves energy efficiency. Insulation in itself does not save lives. It is the increase in temperature achieved by turning on a heater that generates health benefits, Mr Butler said.

Stop the War on Tenancies aims to fill an information gap in the face of blunders by successive governments on rental property policy.
info@tenancieswar.nz


________________________________________
[1] Schedule 1A Amounts for unlawful acts, Residential Tenancies Act 1986, at http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/whole.html?search=qs_act%40bill%40regulation%40deemedreg_residential+tenancies+act_resel_25_h&p=1#DLM3285790

[2] How Insulation Works, Level. http://www.level.org.nz/passive-design/insulation/how-insulation-works/
[3] Qualifying ceiling insulation. See http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2016/0128/16.0/DLM6856254.html
[4] Healthy Homes Standards: Options for the discussion, May 18, 2018. P8
[5] The proposed healthy homes regulations, Tailrisk Economics, December 2018, p18. See http://www.tailrisk.co.nz/documentlist

ends

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.