Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Peter Ellis granted leave to appeal to Supreme Court

31 July 2019

MEDIA RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE PUBLICATION

PETER HUGH McGREGOR ELLIS v THE QUEEN

(SC 49/2019) [2019] NZSC 83

PRESS SUMMARY

This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment and reasons can be found at Judicial Decisions of Public Interest www.courtsofnz.govt.nz

Suppression

Please note that the publication of the names or identifying particulars of the complainants and child witnesses under the age of 17 is prohibited by ss 139 and 139A of the Criminal Justice Act 1985.

Introduction

Mr Ellis was convicted on 16 charges of sexual offending against seven children in 1993. The complainants attended the Christchurch Civic Childcare Centre where Mr Ellis was employed.

Mr Ellis appealed twice to the Court of Appeal, the second time after a referral by the Governor-General. The first appeal quashed three of the convictions. The second appeal against the remaining 13 convictions was dismissed in 1999.

Mr Ellis applied to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal against his convictions in June 2019. Mr Ellis also applied for an extension of time to make the application for leave to appeal.

The Crown opposed both applications.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

The Court’s approach

In this case, before determining whether to grant leave to appeal, the Supreme Court had first to consider whether Mr Ellis should be permitted to bring the application given the length of time that has passed since his second appeal was dismissed.

In its judgment, the Court noted the touchstone in deciding whether to grant an extension will always be the interests of justice. Other factors the Court may have regard to include the seriousness of the charges, the strength of the proposed appeal, the impact on others and prejudice to the Crown. Also relevant is whether fresh evidence has come to light.

The Court’s decisions

Application for extension of time

The Supreme Court considered that, despite the delay, the interests of justice require that the application for an extension of time be granted so that the issues can be fully aired on appeal.

Leave application

The Supreme Court granted Mr Ellis’ application for leave to appeal. In accordance with its usual practice, the Court did not give reasons for granting leave to appeal. This is because leave is decided at a preliminary stage and full arguments are dealt with on appeal. There may also be further evidence called by the Crown at the appeal hearing.

The Court instructed the Registrar to arrange a telephone conference to canvass arrangements for the hearing of the appeal including:

(a) whether Mr Ellis will apply for leave to adduce further evidence (apart from the affidavits already filed);

(b) whether the Crown objects to the admission at the appeal hearing of the affidavits filed in support of the application for leave to appeal;

(c) the approximate timeframe for the Crown to file its evidence in reply;

(d) a timetable for filing submissions; and

(e) the likely duration and timing of the appeal hearing.

[Scoop copy of full decision: 2019NZSC83_EllisvR_Leave.pdf]

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines



Gordon Campbell: On The Newshub/Smokefree Twin Fiascos


Here’s a tale of two sunset industries. One has a track record of quality investigative reporting, and sound reportage of the 24/7 news cycle. The other sunset industry peddles a deadly substance that kills and injures tens of thousands of New Zealanders every year, while imposing significant annual costs on the public health system.

Which industry is this government rushing to assist..?
More


 
 


ACT: New Zealand Dodges Dopey Experiment In Prohibition

“Labour’s attempted crackdown on smokers would have delivered criminal groups a near-monopoly over the cigarette trade,” says ACT Health spokesman Todd Stephenson... More


Government: Backs Police To Crackdown On Gangs
The coalition Government is restoring law and order by providing police new tools to crack down on criminal gangs, says Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Police Minister Mark Mitchell. “Over the last five years gangs have recruited more than 3000 members, a 51 per cent increase... More


Government: Humanitarian Support For Gaza & West Bank

Winston Peters has announced NZ is providing a further $5M to respond to the extreme humanitarian need in Gaza and the West Bank. “The impact of the Israel-Hamas conflict on civilians is absolutely appalling," he said... More


Government: New High Court Judge Appointed

Judith Collins has announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister Jason Scott McHerron as a High Court Judge. Justice McHerron graduated from the University of Otago with a BA in English Literature in 1994 and an LLB in 1996... More

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.