Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Publicly Funded Broadcasting Allocation Condemned

A combined release from:

Social Credit Party

Māori Party

New Conservative Party

NZ Outdoors Party

Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party

The just announced allocation of publicly funded money to parties for broadcasting for the election campaign is unjust, unfair, and an affront to voters

National and Labour have been given $2.5 million between them (even more than last election) with the remaining $1.65 million spread over 17 other parties.

Even the Labour party agree that it is unfair, complaining that it has been short changed by $82,915 – vastly more than most of the parties outside parliament have even been allocated.

The criteria used by the Electoral Commission are a joke. They blatantly cement in the two party system making it almost impossible for parties outside parliament to get their policies heard.

We’re calling on the Electoral Commission to cancel its determination and on the Government to urgently revisit the allocation criteria so that they are more in line with the needs of voters in a democracy to be able to find out what alternatives are available.

The committee of parliament that allocates public money to parties for election broadcasting is dominated by National and Labour and they allocate themselves the vast majority of the money.

At the launch of her book 'Promises Promises - 80 years of wooing New Zealand voters, Massey University professor of communication design Claire Robinson said "Not only do National and Labour gift themselves a war chest from public funds but they also have substantial sums donated by big business and wealthy individuals."

"This confers on them a massive advantage to be able to retain the dominant position they already have in New Zealand's political landscape."

Professor Robinson said she thinks the allocation of public broadcasting funds should be turned on its head so that the smaller parties got the funding they needed to provide people with the information on which to base an informed vote.

"New ideas don't come from the centre where National and Labour reside but from the margins which are the home of the smaller parties."

In her book she points out as an example that the change to proportional representation came about largely because of public mistrust in the 1978 and 1981 election outcomes in which Social Credit gained 16.1% in 1978 but only one seat, and 20.7% in 1981 but only two seats. It had campaigned on proportional representation for many years previously.

A radical reform of the rules is required, encompassing political donations, parliamentary services spending, and public funding for election broadcasting.

In addition to taxpayer money for broadcasting, the parties in parliament already use about $50 million each year of taxpayer funds for research and media staff, newsletters, focus groups, surveys, MPs and staff travel and accommodation and a plethora of other services – many of which are used by them to build their public profile.

If that’s not bad enough National and Labour leaders have refused to debate on television with other party leaders and this has been supported by the state media who have allowed the two bigger parties to dictate the terms of debate forums.

Elections should be about providing information so that voters can, in their view, make the best choice for them. To do that they need to know what is being offered.

National and Labour having a stranglehold on that process is not serving voters or democracy.

The broadcasting allocation should be shared equally across all parties that stood 7 or more candidates at the previous election, but with a small allocation for new parties that meet the registration qualifications.

We don’t condone the passing of legislation under urgency without proper public consultation, but if the government can pass urgent legislation on gun laws and the granting of extraordinary powers for officials and police relating to Corona virus health measures, then it can pass urgent legislation to give all established political parties equal public funding for election broadcasts for this and future elections.

There won’t be any public outcry at the passing of such legislation, in fact the public would welcome such a move which would confirm that the government is commitment to fairness and democracy.

For it not to do so, or find a reason why there is not enough time to do so, would confirm the exact opposite.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The America’s Cup, Critical Race Theory And A New, Weekly Music Playlist

So… Why don’t they just cut to the chase, and call it the Emirates Cup? As this column predicted several months ago, the next America’s Cup challenge is headed overseas. Here’s what Werewolf said back in March:
Emirates has made a major commitment to Portsmouth/Isle of Wight as a sailing centre of excellence – and voila, that’s where the next challenger of record is coming from, and where the next Cup contest could well be sailed. Such incredible luck for Emirates, right..? More>>


Marine: Wider Roll-out Of Cameras On Boats To Support Sustainability And Protect Marine Life

Up to 300 inshore commercial fishing vessels will be fitted with on-board cameras by 2024 as part of the Government’s commitment to protect the natural marine environment for future generations... More>>


Government: Plan For Vaccine Rollout For General Population Announced

New Zealanders over 60 will be offered a vaccination from July 28 and those over 55 from August 11, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced today... More>>


Jewish Council: New Zealand Not Immune From Rise In Antisemitism

The representative body of New Zealand Jewry, the NZ Jewish Council (NZJC), has expressed concern about the high number of antisemitic incidents in New Zealand recorded last month. Spokesperson for the NZJC, Juliet Moses, said... More>>

NZNO: Nurses Reject DHB Offer And Confirm Strike Action

The New Zealand Nurses Organisation says its 30,000 members who work in DHBs have voted overwhelmingly to reject a second offer in their current round of multi-employer collective agreement (MECA) negotiations... More>>





InfoPages News Channels